Recommended Posts

(Reuters) - A New Jersey woman said on Monday that she was dismissed from a temporary job at a New York lingerie warehouse because her male employers felt she was too busty and dressed too provocatively for the workplace.

Wearing a form-fitting sequined black dress and black leather, sequin-studded boots, Lauren Odes, 29, said her Orthodox Jewish employers at Native Intimates told her that outfit and others like it were "too hot" for the warehouse.

"We should not be judged by the size of our breasts or the shape of our body,"

Odes said.

Odes's attorney, celebrity lawyer Gloria Allred, said she filed a gender and religious discrimination complaint with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in New York.

Odes said she felt her wardrobe was appropriate for a business that sells "thongs with hearts placed in the female genital area and boy shorts for women that say 'hot' in the buttocks area." :huh:

Media photographers climbed on chairs and crashed into each other as Odes held a pose and Allred held up a series of purple, black and brown outfits she said also led to the woman's dismissal.

Odes said that on successive days during her week-long employment in late April she was warned that her attire was too alluring, that her breasts should be taped down to make them look smaller, and that she was asked to wear a red bathrobe to cover one outfit.

more

post-37120-0-62086000-1337649779.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1078785-fired-for-being-too-hot/
Share on other sites

Jews have this issue with decency, they require their employees to wear something that isn't showing off their bodies, not a bloody Burqa, but still.

Every work place can set its own regulations regarding clothing.

Plus she's SO not hot, she is borderline fugly, I wouldn't touch her with a laser dot.

If they really told her to tape down her boobs to make them look smaller, that's over the line and she may have a case. But the rest of it? Even if it is a lingerie store, they're allowed to set rules about what employees can wear, and it's still a business. I find it really hard to believe the media was falling all over themselves to take photos of her anyway O_o She's not famous, and not ugly, but not smoking hot either.

gloria was busy.... :rolleyes:

Debrahlee Lorenzana, buxom banker who sued Citibank, says Gloria Allred was playing to media

Published: Monday, May 21, 2012, 11:01 PM

When the cameras left, so did Gloria.

At least that?s what one of Gloria Allred?s former clients, too-hot-for-work banker Debrahlee Lorenzana, said of the high-profile celebrity litigator.

Lorenzana, a buxom beauty who was axed from her job at Citigroup in 2010, said she fought the bank by herself in arbitration after Allred dropped her as a client.

?If I could turn back time, I would have not chosen Gloria Allred as my lawyer,? she said.

The 35-year-old knockout sued her former employer for allegedly canning her over her killer curves.

http://www.nydailyne...8#ixzz1vbnsNYDe

image.jpg

gloria is busy.... :rolleyes:

Debrahlee Lorenzana, buxom banker who sued Citibank, says Gloria Allred was playing to media

Published: Monday, May 21, 2012, 11:01 PM

When the cameras left, so did Gloria.

At least that?s what one of Gloria Allred?s former clients, too-hot-for-work banker Debrahlee Lorenzana, said of the high-profile celebrity litigator.

Lorenzana, a buxom beauty who was axed from her job at Citigroup in 2010, said she fought the bank by herself in arbitration after Allred dropped her as a client.

?If I could turn back time, I would have not chosen Gloria Allred as my lawyer,? she said.

The 35-year-old knockout sued her former employer for allegedly canning her over her killer curves.

http://www.nydailyne...8#ixzz1vbnsNYDe

<snipped>

Oohft. No question about the killer curves on this one.

On topic, there is a difference between being fired for breaching dress code and being fired for being 'too hot'.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft confirms Recycle Bin bug across all versions of Windows by Usama Jawad A couple of days ago, we reported that the latest Patch Tuesday update has seemingly resulted in a lot of issues for many users, including OneDrive and Dropbox access problems, BitLocker recovery lockouts, and BSODs. Although Microsoft is yet to acknowledge these bugs, it has confirmed another, relatively smaller issue across all supported versions of Windows. In an update on its Windows Release Health Dashboard, Microsoft has confirmed that after installing June's Patch Tuesday update (KB5094126), you'll experience unexpected behavior when leveraging Recycle Bin. Basically, when you attempt to delete an item from the Recycle Bin, the confirm dialog will show you the internal file name of that content rather than the actual name. For example, the file may be named abc.png, but the confirm dialog will ask if you're sure that you want to permanently delete $Rxxxxx.png from the Recycle Bin. This is pretty much it for the scope of the bug itself; it just displays the wrong name in the confirm dialog. The correct name will be shown in the list view of the Recycle Bin and if you restore the file, it will return with the correct name as well. This issue affects pretty much all supported versions of Windows client and server, including: Client: Windows 11, version 26H1; Windows 11, version 25H2; Windows 11, version 24H2; Windows 11, version 23H2; Windows 10, version 22H2; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSC 2021; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSC 2019; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSB 2016 Server: Windows Server 2025; Windows Server 2022; Windows Server 2019; Windows Server 2016; Windows Server 2012 R2; Windows Server 2012 As things currently stand, Microsoft is working on a concrete solution that will be released in a "future" Windows update. It remains to be seen if the firm will wait till the next Patch Tuesday or roll out an out-of-band (OOB) fix. The good news is that commercial customers can deploy a workaround right now, but they will have to reach out to Microsoft Support for Business for additional details.
    • They said by this time everyone will have flying cars. WELL...
    • A study by physicist Henry Tye of Cornell University suggests that the universe may not expand forever. Instead, it could eventually stop expanding, begin contracting and end in a "Big Crunch" roughly 20 billion years from now. Maybe not as we now know that time can flow backwards.
    • Of course. Simply reverse the polarity.
    • It is clear from this aricle that "Time Is On My Side" no matter which direction it is flowing., https://noai.duckduckgo.com/?i...m%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DsEj8lUx0gwY
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      577
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      183
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      72
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!