Recommended Posts

(Reuters) - A New Jersey woman said on Monday that she was dismissed from a temporary job at a New York lingerie warehouse because her male employers felt she was too busty and dressed too provocatively for the workplace.

Wearing a form-fitting sequined black dress and black leather, sequin-studded boots, Lauren Odes, 29, said her Orthodox Jewish employers at Native Intimates told her that outfit and others like it were "too hot" for the warehouse.

"We should not be judged by the size of our breasts or the shape of our body,"

Odes said.

Odes's attorney, celebrity lawyer Gloria Allred, said she filed a gender and religious discrimination complaint with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in New York.

Odes said she felt her wardrobe was appropriate for a business that sells "thongs with hearts placed in the female genital area and boy shorts for women that say 'hot' in the buttocks area." :huh:

Media photographers climbed on chairs and crashed into each other as Odes held a pose and Allred held up a series of purple, black and brown outfits she said also led to the woman's dismissal.

Odes said that on successive days during her week-long employment in late April she was warned that her attire was too alluring, that her breasts should be taped down to make them look smaller, and that she was asked to wear a red bathrobe to cover one outfit.

more

post-37120-0-62086000-1337649779.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1078785-fired-for-being-too-hot/
Share on other sites

Jews have this issue with decency, they require their employees to wear something that isn't showing off their bodies, not a bloody Burqa, but still.

Every work place can set its own regulations regarding clothing.

Plus she's SO not hot, she is borderline fugly, I wouldn't touch her with a laser dot.

If they really told her to tape down her boobs to make them look smaller, that's over the line and she may have a case. But the rest of it? Even if it is a lingerie store, they're allowed to set rules about what employees can wear, and it's still a business. I find it really hard to believe the media was falling all over themselves to take photos of her anyway O_o She's not famous, and not ugly, but not smoking hot either.

gloria was busy.... :rolleyes:

Debrahlee Lorenzana, buxom banker who sued Citibank, says Gloria Allred was playing to media

Published: Monday, May 21, 2012, 11:01 PM

When the cameras left, so did Gloria.

At least that?s what one of Gloria Allred?s former clients, too-hot-for-work banker Debrahlee Lorenzana, said of the high-profile celebrity litigator.

Lorenzana, a buxom beauty who was axed from her job at Citigroup in 2010, said she fought the bank by herself in arbitration after Allred dropped her as a client.

?If I could turn back time, I would have not chosen Gloria Allred as my lawyer,? she said.

The 35-year-old knockout sued her former employer for allegedly canning her over her killer curves.

http://www.nydailyne...8#ixzz1vbnsNYDe

image.jpg

gloria is busy.... :rolleyes:

Debrahlee Lorenzana, buxom banker who sued Citibank, says Gloria Allred was playing to media

Published: Monday, May 21, 2012, 11:01 PM

When the cameras left, so did Gloria.

At least that?s what one of Gloria Allred?s former clients, too-hot-for-work banker Debrahlee Lorenzana, said of the high-profile celebrity litigator.

Lorenzana, a buxom beauty who was axed from her job at Citigroup in 2010, said she fought the bank by herself in arbitration after Allred dropped her as a client.

?If I could turn back time, I would have not chosen Gloria Allred as my lawyer,? she said.

The 35-year-old knockout sued her former employer for allegedly canning her over her killer curves.

http://www.nydailyne...8#ixzz1vbnsNYDe

<snipped>

Oohft. No question about the killer curves on this one.

On topic, there is a difference between being fired for breaching dress code and being fired for being 'too hot'.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft's fast coding model MAI-Code-1-Flash comes to Copilot Business and Enterprise by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft’s recently announced MAI-Code-1-Flash model is now generally available to GitHub Copilot Business and Copilot Enterprise customers. With this support, organizations can have more centralized policy controls and billing while finally being able to use Microsoft’s lightweight, first-party coding model. According to GitHub’s announcement, Business and Enterprise plan administrators must enable the MAI-Code-1-Flash policy in Copilot settings before developers can access the model. Microsoft says that MAI-Code-1-Flash is for fast, iterative coding work rather than the most demanding architectural or debugging tasks. GitHub’s official model comparison page says that the model is great for "general-purpose coding and writing," while it excels at fast, accurate code completions and explanations Microsoft introduced MAI-Code-1-Flash on June 2 as part of a broader collection of internally developed MAI models. GitHub subsequently expanded support to Copilot CLI, the Copilot cloud agent, GitHub.com chat, GitHub Mobile, Visual Studio, JetBrains IDEs, Eclipse, and Xcode, but said support for managed Business and Enterprise customers was still on the way. In Microsoft’s own benchmark testing, MAI-Code-1-Flash scored 51.2% on SWE-Bench Pro, compared with 35.2% for Anthropic’s Claude Haiku 4.5. Microsoft also claimed that the model used up to 60% fewer tokens on SWE-Bench Verified. Do note that these are vendor-run results rather than independent measurements. The model is billed at provider list pricing under GitHub’s usage-based system. GitHub currently lists MAI-Code-1-Flash at $0.75 per million input tokens, $0.075 per million cached input tokens, and $4.50 per million output tokens. For organizations, the main incentive to use MAI-Code-1-Flash is likely to be efficiency rather than maximum capability. A smaller model that responds quickly and limits unnecessary output is quite useful for repetitive agent tasks at scale, especially after GitHub Copilot’s move toward usage-based billing. The "Flash" model is recommended for fast work and not necessarily for huge repositories with loads of context. It's better if teams compare their output with other larger models, especially if they're working on security-sensitive changes and complex, multi-file work.
    • yes AND no the "original" or plain/normal Optiplex 7010 won't be getting any more new firmware updates BUT the Optiplex SFF/SFF Plus {small form factor}, Micro/Micro Plus & Tower/Tower Plus 7010 editions DO get new updates such as this new one   and here are similar guides from the Dell web site for Dell systems: https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000390990/secure-boot-transition-faq https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000347876/microsoft-2011-secure-boot-certificate-expiration
    • AT&T has been spying on US citizens with the NSA for decades.. they just know how to keep it more under wraps.. the evil level is still there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      462
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      212
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!