New, reliable, SSD; Intel 520 or Kingston HyperX?


Recommended Posts

Given this thread I am kinda looking for a more reliable SSD than my current OCZ as a boot disk for my main computer.

I have two in mind: Intel 520 120 GB or Kingston HyperX 120 GB

Which one do you guys recommend and why?

I can use the SATA III connection and speed, because my mobo supports it.

Personally I'd avoid SandForce based models...

Glassed Silver:mac

care to explain why? they've corrected pretty much all the original issues with sandforce controllers... and its one of the widest used controllers now that intel helps with its development

care to explain why? they've corrected pretty much all the original issues with sandforce controllers... and its one of the widest used controllers now that intel helps with its development

Hmm interesting...

I shall look into comparison tables then again sooner or later...

Still waiting for decent prices for 500GB models. Or ideally 1TB drives...

Glassed Silver:mac

Since I'm now officially a soon-to-be member of this still rather exclusive club of SSD owners, may I suggest, with my limited knowledge, the Vertex 4? I know you don't want an OCZ again, but since the V4 has a Marvell based controller instead of Sandforce (as with previous installments of the Vertex line), perhaps you will reconsider? But if not, and you're set on one of the two you mentioned, I'd probably go for the Intel 520. As far as specs go, they seem about the same. I haven't heard anything about Kingston SSD's, but Intel's are always mentioned in a favorable light.

  • Like 1

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820226236

I know it has the Sandforce controller, but I just built a rig for a friend and used the 60 gig model of this drive and it works great. No firmware updates were needed to fix any issues, which is more than I can say for my SSD, among others.

It's 120 gig for under 100 bucks. 90k IOPS, 550 meg/sec read 515 meg/sec write and comes with the adapter bracket. I'm thinking about picking up two for a disk stripe.

SandForce is definitely maturing with Intel at the helm. Of the two I'd recommend that one for reliability.

If you're taking suggestions and manage to find Shiven's thread about SSDs we came to the conclusion either the Vertex 4 or the Crucial M4 are the way to go. I've owned two Crucial drives already (and only upgraded for increased capacity) and they're rock solid and fast. The Vertex 4 shies away from SandForce and uses an Indilinx Everest 2 controller which is also a viable alternative, with an even faster write speed than the M4. Retailers tend to price the Vertex 4 a little higher than the M4, so it depends on whether the price difference is worth it if you take either into consideration.

Will the Vertex 4 give me the same issues as my other Vertex's 1 and 2?

Or are these controller-related and/or model/time related?

What issues have you had? I've used every version of OCZ SSD (except for the 4) and they are all still running strong.

I'm assuming you have the latest firmware running on them, correct?

Sorry to jump the thread but I have a question re: SSD. I'm doing a new build and am curious what kind of perfomance there is when Win7 is on SSD but games are on HDD? Is there a noticeable hit? Should I wait and get the biggest SSD I can afford?

Sorry to jump the thread but I have a question re: SSD. I'm doing a new build and am curious what kind of perfomance there is when Win7 is on SSD but games are on HDD? Is there a noticeable hit? Should I wait and get the biggest SSD I can afford?

You'll probably be able to read them at whatever speed your HDD is at. I assume it would be similar to plugging in an external HDD and running a game off of that. Someone correct me if I'm wrong here.

Personally I'd avoid SandForce based models...

+1. Sandforce does not equal reliability. I really wish Intel had not moved to Sandforce; bad move IMO. They may have fixed the issues in their firmware, but time will tell.

As for a recommendation, I have bought 50+ Samsung 830s, both in 128Gb and 256Gb models and they are excellent. Very fast, reliable and work as well in Macs as they do in PCs. You can't go wrong.

http://www.anandtech...-ssd-830-review

http://www.anandtech...-to-sandforce/9

Sorry to jump the thread but I have a question re: SSD. I'm doing a new build and am curious what kind of perfomance there is when Win7 is on SSD but games are on HDD? Is there a noticeable hit? Should I wait and get the biggest SSD I can afford?

Load times are really the only area you'll see an improvement. Is it nice? Yes, but not absolutely necessary.

I wouldn't get anything smaller than a 128GB drive considering they don't cost any more than $150 or so.

What issues have you had? I've used every version of OCZ SSD (except for the 4) and they are all still running strong.

I'm assuming you have the latest firmware running on them, correct?

Yes I have all latest firmware.

I have to plug out the powercable once in a while to get the SSD recognized again. Kinda annoying I must say.....

I had an OCZ Vertex 2 and recently swapped it out for a Kingston Hyper X 240GB, as I needed more space. Also got another Kingston for my laptop to replace the drive. I don't run any benchmarks, so I can't give y ou any numbers, but I have had no problems with either one.

snapback.pngsoLoredd, on 30 May 2012 - 23:35, said:

Sorry to jump the thread but I have a question re: SSD. I'm doing a new build and am curious what kind of perfomance there is when Win7 is on SSD but games are on HDD? Is there a noticeable hit? Should I wait and get the biggest SSD I can afford?

SSD's have much faster reads and writes, so whatever it is you want to have running faster, put it on the SSD. If you want games to run faster (less load times, better response - also widely depends on games), then it makes no sense in putting Windows on the SSD and the games on a regular HDD.

On the other hand, if you get an 128GB SSD, with almost every game now coming out having over 10GB in size, you'll run out of space fast.

Reliability? Samsung.

Speed? OCZ/Kingston.

Best of both worlds? Might be the Vertex 4 if the controller is really a custom Indilinx controller and not a re-branded Marvell like I've seen some people claim. Hasn't been long enough (and won't be for some time) for anyone to get reliability reports on the drives.

Reliability? Samsung.

Speed? OCZ/Kingston.

Best of both worlds? Might be the Vertex 4 if the controller is really a custom Indilinx controller and not a re-branded Marvell like I've seen some people claim. Hasn't been long enough (and won't be for some time) for anyone to get reliability reports on the drives.

Given OCZ's track record I would avoid them at all cost. Spending a few more bucks on Intel or Samsung is very much worth it IMO. Not sure which is cheaper though. In speed tests the Samsung 830 is on a par with the Intel 520 and I can vouch for the Intel 510 which is no longer on sale as being excellent too.

http://www.anandtech...-ssd-830-review

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Ummmm that is what is it supposed to do. Just turn if off in settings if you do not want it analyzing your open tabs. Chrome does the same thing with Gemini. Sarfari will do the samething after Apple's AI and even more so with the release of their 27 versions that is now powered by Googles LLM/ML models. Understanding why it is doing it and how it can help you vs jumping to some conspiracy theroy is a much better approach. As long as it can be turned off, all is good. Yes the default should be off but the a lot of people would never discover these features.
    • Just another reason (aside from many others) not to use Edge. Firefox 153.0b5 DEx64 has a similar feature added recently in prior builds that I will turn off at some point when I get around to it. It's the new "Something looks suspicious" page that pops up here and there. It cleverly hides itself between web pages that I've actually visited; as a result, you know, of selecting a web page and telling the browser where to go. The interesting thing is that it does not produce these warnings from pages that I, as the only intelligent user of the browser in my system, have ever directed the browser to open! What seems to be happening is that the browser looks at all the goofy ad links on a web page I do actually open and selects one that "looks suspicious" and then creates the "something looks suspicious" web page, which is neatly inserted, as mentioned, between web pages my RB ("real brain") has directed the browser to load in a session. The thing is, I usually look at links I am considering to follow before I ask the browser to load them, and in cases I have noticed where the link does indeed look suspicious, most of the time I will choose to not follow the link at all. Doesn't everyone do this or something similar? I am picky about what I voluntarily load... (I don't like links that start off fine, with a site designaiton that seems normal enough but then is followed by indecipherable alphanumeric strings many, many lines long, etc. I tend to reject those because they look suspicious. They may not be, but I don't care... I'll stay with Firefox, of course, if for no other reason than they usually let you turn off the junk you don't like. And because it isn't Edge... But at some point Microsoft will come to realize that putting your bookmarks on the left side is a Good Thing for a lot of people, just as Microsoft discovered when it had the bright idea of nailing the Windows taskbar to the bottom of the screen, when for decades Microsoft browsers had left that placement up to the user. They have finally reversed the obscenity of that decision. Finally.
    • Google was using the old CATPCHAs data to train their LLMs. What is the say they won't use this camera data of users to train their LLM? these companies need some strict regulations!
    • Depends on what you need. Might be a bit clearer on what you plan to do with it. Sort of a waste if you get the newest and greatest, but don't know how to use it.
    • NTLite 2026.06.11200 by Razvan Serea NTLite is a Windows configuration tool that allows you to modify your existing Windows install or an image yet to be deployed, remove Windows components, configure and integrate, speed up the Windows deployment process. Reduce Windows footprint on your RAM and storage drive memory. Remove components of your choice, guarded by compatibility safety mechanisms, which speed up finding that sweet spot. Windows Unattended feature support, providing many commonly used options on a single page for easy setup. Easily integrate a single or multiple drivers, update or language packages. Package integration features smart sorting, enabling you to seamlessly add packages for integration and the tool will apply them in the appropriate order, keeping hotfix compatibility in check. One of the important new features of NTLite (compared to its predecessors) is the ability to modify an already installed the operating system, by removing unnecessary components. Supports Windows 11, 10, 8.1 and 7, x86 and x64, live and image. Server editions of the same versions, excluding support for component removals and feature configuration. ARM64 image support in the alpha stage. Does not support Checked/Debug, Embedded, IoT editions, nor Vista or XP. NTLite 2026.06.11200 changelog: New Secure Boot Migration support: Verification, certificate staging, and boot-manager/sector update across the Image, Updates, Apply, and Create-ISO pages (2023 CA migration, optional 2011 revocation, Anti-rollback, Boot sector choice etc) Secure Boot Host Readiness: Live host Secure Boot migration monitor and Servicing-task control Option under Image page - C:\Windows row, or load the host as the target - Updates - Secure Boot Image: 'Sort mounted images first' option for the image list in Menu-Settings UI: Hover description card for Components and Unattended pages, selectable text and quick access to Compatibility options Command line: Relay commands into the already-running instance Enables controlling already running NTLite via ntlite.exe Use /NewInstance to launch an additional instance using CLI operations (premium) UI: 'New instance' option via main menu instead of a secondary ntlite.exe prompt Apply: Hide individual Apply-page notes with a per-note dismiss (X), critical excluded Settings: 'Unsigned RDP file launch warnings' tweak (RDP client), bypassing the April 2026 security-update prompt on RDP connections Upgrade Image: Live OS and deployed image editing now unlocked on free/test licenses, same licensing as images Image: 'Recompress' option in manual dialog Remove Editions to shrink the WIM in one session Image: SWM part size set inline on the Apply page and image dialogs, split-size popup retired Image: Relative 'Last change' dates; editions grouped by build time to reduce noise Image: 'Forget - Missing' on the Edit-cache menu to mass drop entries whose folder is gone Components: Root groups reorganized - user-facing groups first, system/critical last Components: Show filter options to view components by Template or App-type, since Apps are now merged into groups Presets: Delete confirmation now lists the multi-selected preset names UI: Design update propagated to the rest of the tool UI: Filter and search match words in any order and partially, better results filtering Components Unattended: Input-locale language derives from the user locale, with an independent keyboard picker, enables combinations previously unavailable Unattended: Input-locale now allows for a user value override Unattended: Localization OOBE WinPE now can be copied with the new WinPE Copy OOBE localization toggle, enter locale settings once for both stages Updates: Downloader greys and locks updates the image already carries (hotfix and MSIX) Updates: Resume interrupted update downloads Command line: Many upgrades, see /?, now prints help to the console or redirected output UI-Translation: Finnish language added, also thanks for Chinese Traditional (Matt), French (tistou77), Italian (clarensio), Russian (RDS), Swedish (1FF), Vietnamese (Vu Anh Vu) Fix Components: Containers removal breaking Apps deployment Components: Microsoft Account had leftovers when Easy Migrate is kept Image: Export to an existing WIM improvements, Append renamed to Merge Image: Improved 26H1 live removal support Image: No more 'X:\ not accessible' popup for certain drives during image scan Presets: Manual image refresh picks up presets added/removed outside the app Tweaks: Disabled visual-effect animations no longer return after first logon on a new profile Tweaks: Live Visual Effects toggles (animations, drag full windows, font smoothing) now apply correctly Download: NTLite 2026.06.11200 | 20.5 MB (Free, paid upgrade available) Link: NTLite Home Page | NTLite Features | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      510
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      258
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      94
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!