The direction Microsoft took with Windows 8  

855 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you like the direction Microsoft took with Windows 8?

    • Yes I love it, i'll be upgrading
    • No I hate it, i'll stick with Windows 7
    • It doesn't bother me
    • I will use Windows 8 with a start menu hack program


Recommended Posts

I have some doubts about Windows 8. There are some things done poorly or just broke imo. However, I just want to say that I own three android tablets, all capable of running Windows 8, so please Microsoft, let me buy WinRT for them!

I don't think they can do that since ARM OSs are custom fit to the hardware.

It is interesting to note that many of the RTM reviews are rather positive. Everyone acknowledges that it is definitely an incomplete 1.0 product, but taken as two disparate elements - general direction of Metro is being applauded as are the improvements to Desktop. It is no doubt that the Desktop in itself is a much greater leap forward from Windows 7 than Windows 7 was from Vista SP1. Some of the performance increases, particularly in multimedia areas, are sensational. I feel Microsoft has spent a lot of time obsessively fine tuning visual responsiveness, everything feels much faster in general usage as well, to the point of perfection. Others will surely increase further with time and drivers, such as gaming.

Perhaps the most positive review (not exactly a review) is by The Verge, arguably the most pro-Apple site on the internet. David Pierce, a long time Apple user, has decided to toss his iPad and MacBook Air out of the window and switch to a Windows 8 device. If you have read this guy's previous articles, that was pretty shocking to see. His thoughts are much more relevant to the general user as well.

Like every new ecosystem, it would probably be a few years before things start shaping up, but I have no doubt this is a great new direction that will change my computing experience, provided I am up for the change.

The Verge, arguably the most pro-Apple site on the internet.

That actually made me really sad. I used to read WinRumors as my #1 news source before Neowin, but then Tom moved over to The Verge trying to breathe some life into their Microsoft-loving side :)

To hear that they're still pro-apple is a little disappointing.

but yeah, I do think a lot of people are going to be amazed with the new UI

It doesn't work that way. It's not like we show them a finished product and say "do you like that?" In fact, the opinions expressed are only part of the equation. The more interesting thing is how easy or hard it is for them to accomplish tasks without help.

Fair enough.

BTW, can you answer a question that's really bugging me?

WHY can't we specify an installation path for apps from the store? This is massively annoying. I do NOT want to clog my windows partition up with apps, and for people using an SSD (which aren't likely to be too huge), this is going to cause problems.

I have a few complaints about Windows 8. I got the start screen looking pretty good with all my programs listed that I want. But when I log in as a new user, not a single program is listed on the start screen. Are users using the computer suppose to just know what is installed? Or are they suppose to go to the all apps screen and get flooded with 100+ programs all on one screen. Also noticed there is no log off button, only sleep, restart and shutdown. Maybe all this stuff can be set in group policy but these are huge problems in an enterprise environment. Also would be nice if there was list of recently used programs/documents on the start screen. Again maybe this can be turned on some how?

Also noticed there is no log off button, only sleep, restart and shutdown.

Win + I, Power for shutdown options, click your name in the upper right hand corner of the Start Screen for log off & lock options.

Maybe all this stuff can be set in group policy but these are huge problems in an enterprise environment.

you do realize that the whole point (AFAIK) of group policy is to make it easy for an enterprise environment to customize windows? IT admins would have no problem changing group policy settings ;D

Also would be nice if there was list of recently used programs/documents on the start screen. Again maybe this can be turned on some how?

not that I know of although you can always open up explorer and then click "Recent Places" (or you could pin the link to your start screen by right-clicking it under "Favorites" in the left-hand column of an Explorer window and clicking "Pin to Start")

you do realize that the whole point (AFAIK) of group policy is to make it easy for an enterprise environment to customize windows? IT admins would have no problem changing group policy settings ;D

I kinda mistype that, I meant Maybe all this stuff can be set in group policy but if not these are huge problems in an enterprise environment.

Like every new ecosystem, it would probably be a few years before things start shaping up, but I have no doubt this is a great new direction that will change my computing experience, provided I am up for the change.

Better not take years. 7 wasn't broken and competition is too fierce. MS better have this locomotive running full steam ahead in the first 180-days.

It is no doubt that the Desktop in itself is a much greater leap forward from Windows 7 than Windows 7 was from Vista SP1.

Perhaps the most positive review (not exactly a review) is by The Verge, arguably the most pro-Apple site on the internet. David Pierce, a long time Apple user,

How is the Desktop a much greater leap forward again? Win7 added several functional changes, Win8 removed many of the ones from 7 and gave us what back in their stead? (Don't say 'performance') You'll have to forgive me if the stamp of approval from a Mac guy is supposed to reassure me. :x

I think win8 would be great on tablets and touch screens... And I mean, it's doable on a desktop/laptop... It's just kind of dinky. The start screen is kind of a novelty. Yes, you pretty much have to use it, unless you get start8 or whatever classic start menu apps there are out there, but you can do the majority of your day to day computing activities without leaving the "desktop app". Its a minor annoyance for us non-touch users, but its tolerable.

So, I went back to WIN7 over the weekend...

The issues that bugged me the most in WIN8:

- having to always enable/disable the ethernet card or renew ipconfig to get the Internet access after logging in initially;

- experienced certain conflicts with the parallel environments and XONAR HDAV1.3 Deluxe;

- occasional jittery audio when listening to music and playing SC2.

The Start Screen didn't bother me and I didn't miss the Start Menu as I quickly learned the new shortcuts (I loved win+i, win+w, win+d)...which I'm going to miss, by the way, although there's no need for them at all in WIN7 as I can just click, click, click the old way).

Overall, I just didn't feel like waiting for the moment when WIN8 gets ironed out when there's already WIN7 that suits me wonderfully and comes free of the bloatware (the second parallel environment and integrated live ID services).

I wasn't convinced with the start menu, metro apps and some UI choices. And I decided to give it a shot on the last few days and... Well, it's great! I still use desktop most of the time and the OS is really fast. I still think that metro apps should have a windowed option, but besides that, Windows 8 has been great for me. Surprised!

I've used Windows 8 CP from Day 1 on 02/29, was at first impressed, but as time has gone by, I'm less impressed. Had to add Classic Shell to have a Start Menu, as well as my desktop isn't the best choice for it.

My normal OS is Windows 7 SP1, of which I have over $180 tied up in Anytime Upgrade Keys (from Home Premium to Pro) in those. It's a great OS, stable, & has served me well. I'm not going to give that up to get a $40 upgrade, speaking of which, there's a common misconception in regards to that. Many users feels that they're getting a dual boot for that price, & will be in for a rude awakening when they try to attempt to reinstall Win 7 from a backup, recovery partition or recovery disks.

The reason that this will happen? The SLP keys in the BIOS, the heart & soul of your OEM OS, will be permanently deactivated & removed, preventing any further attempts at reinstalling. Then, if one decides that they still need Win 7, an OEM one can be bought at Newegg for as little as $109 on promo.

In other words, if one likes Windows 7 & wants to keep it (even for later use), buy the System Builder edition of Windows 8 Pro, it'll also come with the Media Center.

As for me, I'll get my next version of Windows when I buy a new desktop, probably in 2015, after Windows 9 is released. I don't "hate" Windows 8, as I don't prefer to use that word, but I'm beginning not to like it. Plus, during this same time frame with Windows 7 RC, there was plenty of forum activity over the upcoming OS, I don't see as much enthuiasm with Windows 8 Pro + Media Center, even for $40. In the meantime, I'll buy an OEM copy of Windows 7 Pro SP1 myself, while available, as I may not like that version (Windows 9, assuming that's the name of it).

Is it really that bad, to have to virtually give it away? No recent version of Windows Pro has gone for less than $200, not even XP.

Cat

Is it really that bad, to have to virtually give it away? No recent version of Windows Pro has gone for less than $200, not even XP.

I think it's a combination of Microsoft wanting to top Windows 7's deal, ($50 pre-order for Home Premium) wanting to reduce version confusion, (make it easy for everyone to get the pro version) and wanting to quickly create a large user base for the new app platform.

i am for the most part happy with windows 8 however the start screen is a bit clumsy with mouse and keyboard and lack of a start menu is an a annoyance but its not to bad once set up your start screen how you like. The performance boost is nice and the desktop changes are nice aside from the removal of the start menu. I think things will go ok when windows 8 launches with programs like start8 and classic shell for power users and most OEMs likely will follow Samsungs route and include a start menu of their own or licence start8 to reduce confusion and frustration on non touch devices.

Hello from a newbie (71 years old though)

I have been using each version of W8 since M/S first offered us the ability to download, and am presently using the RTM, waiting on Oct 26... I am almost forced into the upgrade, as my new PC has the AMD FX-8150 CPU, and W8 is a much more tuned to the CPU's architecture... I did install the latest "Classic Start Menu", which does give me a start button, and I chose to have my boot go directly to the desktop, showing the Metro Start for abouot 1 second... I am slowly getting used to the Metro (or Start) as M/S calls it...

Ray (the Old Marine)

Semper Fi

Only in the legacy enterprise / OEM installer which hasn't changed at all for Win8. The installer that 99% of people see (i.e. people doing upgrades, or cleaning installing from an existing installation) is totally new for Win8.

I think he's talking about the UI for the Windows 8 installer uses Windows UI from 7, with the same chrome as 7. The only difference is that the background is purple.

I've never had a problem with Windows 8 itself, though some apps don't work properly. That's to be expected though, and it's not Microsoft's fault. I don't see why people whine and cry so much about something as simple as a start menu. I myself have never used the start menu by clicking it and clicking on programs, and selecting the program I want. I press the Windows key, type the name of the app, and press enter. I can still do that in Windows 8, and it's much faster.

To all you whiners out there, please, PLEASE try to adapt to change, and not be so resistant to it. Just because you're used to a certain way of doing things doesn't mean it's necessarily the best way.

Cheers.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
    • Did you see their FAQ, its quite good. Have a look in the Advanced section. https://delta.chat/en/help
    • Just install Linux Mint that is a real blessing and many times cheaper because you can continue using your old Windows computer/laptop with the latest Linux updates.
    • Interesting share -- however it does not make sense: Email messages get stored somewhere, so how is Delta Chat "based on email" and decentralized without actually storing anything? By Web3 standard practices, the various Relays would require dedicated storage to make messages available to the recipients (like a large series of message queue channels, akin to racks of traditional post office boxes)... and Contacts must be two-way confirmed in order for encryption keys to be exchanged (ostensibly every key-pair is uniquely bound between sender and recipient) and the Relays would preserve the public keys in order to facilitate message carriage... or every device stores all sorts of keys and contact info. All of this to say, decentralized messaging is like running Bluesky nodes except instead of discovering/browsing public feeds by various posters (at the given node) these Delta Chats would be relaying encrypted messages (via Relays) that only trusted recipients would have the appropriate decryption key (their own private key) to read it. But this doesn't solve the "it's like email" sales pitch. The only way it's like email is that there's encrypted binary stuff being transported from your app into the federated ether of Delta Chat Relays for others to decrypt (hopefully only the intended recipient)... but outside of this federated relays framework, it is absolutely nothing like email.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      502
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!