Welcome Guest! To access all forums & features, please register an account or sign-in. → Why register?



1,400 new Internet suffixes proposed


11 replies to this topic - - - - -

#1 Hum

    totally wAcKed

  • 54,471 posts
  • Joined: 05-October 03
  • Location: Odder Space
  • OS: Windows XP, 7

Posted 13 June 2012 - 19:29

Companies and organizations from North America and Europe dominated the bids for new Internet addresses as a key oversight agency prepares for the largest expansion yet in the online addressing system.

The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers received 1,930 proposals for 1,410 different Internet suffixes by the May 30 deadline. Suffixes are the ".com" part of an Internet address. Nearly half of the proposals -- 911 -- were from North America and another 675 came from Europe.

ICANN plans to release details about the proposals at a news conference in London on Wednesday. It disclosed general trends ahead of the announcement. The full list of proposed suffixes was not yet available, though bidders have disclosed some of them, including ".bank," ".baby" and ".YouTube."

If approved, the new suffixes would rival ".com" and about 300 others now in use. Companies would be able to create separate websites and separate addresses for each of their products and brands, for instance, even as they keep their existing ".com" name. Businesses that joined the Internet late, and found desirable ".com" names taken, would have alternatives.

From a technical standpoint, the names let Internet-connected computers know where to send email and locate websites. But they've come to mean much more. Amazon.com Inc., for instance, has built its brand around the domain name.

The expansion will allow suffixes that represent hobbies, ethnic groups, corporate brand names and more.

more


#2 +chAos972

    Neowinian Wise One

  • 4,000 posts
  • Joined: 30-December 03
  • Location: Seattle, WA

Posted 13 June 2012 - 19:30

This'll be both good and really confusing. :wacko: And I wonder how many applications will break because they don't expect long suffixes like ".windows".

#3 lunamonkey

    (Almost) Ten years old.

  • 8,887 posts
  • Joined: 28-May 03
  • Location: Swindon, England

Posted 13 June 2012 - 19:36

View PostchAos972, on 13 June 2012 - 19:30, said:

This'll be both good and really confusing. :wacko: And I wonder how many applications will break because they don't expect long suffixes like ".windows".

Who's fault is that? No one said that a TLD should be validated for the 2,3 or 4 characters that 99% of addresses are currently at.

Even the current .school .museum fail some validators, so it's time people updated their regular expressions.

#4 Colin-uk

    Neowinian Super Star

  • 22,181 posts
  • Joined: 25-February 04
  • Location: Wirral, UK

Posted 13 June 2012 - 19:38

brand names are getting their own suffix?



should be more fun for the scammers and spammers then :)

#5 lunamonkey

    (Almost) Ten years old.

  • 8,887 posts
  • Joined: 28-May 03
  • Location: Swindon, England

Posted 13 June 2012 - 20:16

View PostColin-uk, on 13 June 2012 - 19:38, said:

brand names are getting their own suffix?



should be more fun for the scammers and spammers then :)

Do you mean scammers and spammers will buy ~$200,000 domain names just for purposes of scamming when people are already stupid enough for fall for $5 .biz addresses with no relation to brand names or established organisations?

Or do you mean the opposite? As in, they (scammers) won't be able to buy brand names?

ICANN should not allow generic names to have a TLD (.bank, .shop) as people will resell these. Only brands/trademarks should be allowed.

#6 +chAos972

    Neowinian Wise One

  • 4,000 posts
  • Joined: 30-December 03
  • Location: Seattle, WA

Posted 13 June 2012 - 20:35

View Postlunamonkey, on 13 June 2012 - 19:36, said:

Who's fault is that? No one said that a TLD should be validated for the 2,3 or 4 characters that 99% of addresses are currently at. Even the current .school .museum fail some validators, so it's time people updated their regular expressions.

I never said otherwise - more just a thought.

#7 OP Hum

    totally wAcKed

  • 54,471 posts
  • Joined: 05-October 03
  • Location: Odder Space
  • OS: Windows XP, 7

Posted 13 June 2012 - 20:55

I'm claiming .nigeria :shiftyninja:

#8 +Crisp

    To Infinity and Beyond!

  • 3,655 posts
  • Joined: 06-May 10
  • Location: 127.0.0.1

Posted 13 June 2012 - 20:57

blow.me :p

#9 Aethec

    Neowinian Senior

  • 2,214 posts
  • Joined: 02-May 10

Posted 13 June 2012 - 21:07

If some of the "generic" TLDs were propertly maintained and regulated by a single entity, it'd be awesome. The .bank TLD could be reserved to businesses who can prove they are banks; you could then click on any .bank link you see because it couldn't possibly be a forgery.

#10 SongHyeonDeok

    Lightning in a bottle.

  • 352 posts
  • Joined: 17-October 11

Posted 13 June 2012 - 21:13

Wonder how many people would fall for, your.bank or something like secure.amazon.

#11 +exotoxic

    Neowinian Senior

  • 1,751 posts
  • Joined: 04-April 04
  • Location: England

Posted 13 June 2012 - 21:28

It is just another money making scheme. they know businesses are going to want to protect the names they own.

Quote

The .bank TLD could be reserved to businesses who can prove they are banks; you could then click on any .bank link you see because it couldn't possibly be a forgery.

This could and should have been implemented a long time ago.

#12 vetGrowled

    Resident Rockstar

  • 36,098 posts
  • Joined: 17-December 08
  • Location: USA

Posted 13 June 2012 - 23:54

Sounds like it's going to be a big mess before everything is said and done.