Recommended Posts

I'm absolute rubbishing his statement of it being a spit in the face, I can live with his clarification though.

As previously noted, I am using the tool and loading the ads in a delayed "non-blocking" method in an invisible div. Thus I get speed and usability but waste bandwidth and a decent amount of CPU time; and you guys generate the revenue necessary to keep running.

Google's keynote on adblocking in the adsense network makes a good point. If ads don't annoy users, they don't install ad blocking. Thus if ads are too annoying, they ought be blocked to force the networks to provide less intrusive ads.

They are advocating a balance for their ad system. Personally I think you guys have it pretty well pinned down, guests get a bit of in your face, members get not so much and contributors get nada.

In particular, you are a tech site with a fairly tech savvy user base. Most of us are running these kind of tools. Those of us that are serious about the site are doing our part to help, but these tools are a reality of the modern internet.

Yeah, our ongoing issue is being able to sustain it all.. We aren't on a shared virtual server or crappy piggy backed line, and that costs money is all.. For the first three years we relied on hand outs, had zero ads, and if you remember thats when we went down frequently as well as having to swap hosts all the frigging time.

We've offered stability for the best part of 7 years now, and apart from water damage and a server breaking down (which was immediately ordered and replaced) I think people who remember us from 2000-2005 could agree we're in much better shape now due to the business side of the site, which is something I neglected for the first years, hoping to keep it all free from "pesky ads". It just didn't work, obviously.

I kept meaning to mention this as well. There has been a drastic increase in big adverts recently, not just on Neowin. Apart from Neowin, I instantly leave any website who places something on top of content to advertise registering and won't let me continue until I click "NO".

Adverts like this are ridiculous in general.

Damn it... I actually have an account already, seems my Facebook wasn't linked to my actual account...

There's a lot of space on the right side of the site that could be used for ads. How hard would it to remove the forum posts, polls, most popular tags and anything else that is not needed ( in guest view). You could make an ad just as big as the original one just have it going down the right side instead of the top

  • Like 1

I kept meaning to mention this as well. There has been a drastic increase in big adverts recently, not just on Neowin. Apart from Neowin, I instantly leave any website who places something on top of content to advertise registering and won't let me continue until I click "NO".

Adverts like this are ridiculous in general.

Damn it... I actually have an account already, seems my Facebook wasn't linked to my actual account...

I know what you mean, we've generally not required registration at all.. but maybe we need to do a better job of relaying the benefits of signing up, which is why I hoped for some feedback on that :p The Facebook/Twitter connect buttons is a good start though.

I also visit Cracked.com (and am not registered) and even though I love the site, the popup that randomly appears asking me to register really annoys me, so I wouldn't do it here.

To be honest this looks more like a faulty ad then an intentionally obtrusive advert. There's clearly some style information missing.

I've been seeing ads like that for at least 6 months, so if it is faulty, they sure are taking their time fixing it.

Yeah, our ongoing issue is being able to sustain it all.. We aren't on a shared virtual server or crappy piggy backed line, and that costs money is all.. For the first three years we relied on hand outs, had zero ads, and if you remember thats when we went down frequently as well as having to swap hosts all the frigging time.

We've offered stability for the best part of 7 years now, and apart from water damage and a server breaking down (which was immediately ordered and replaced) I think people who remember us from 2000-2005 could agree we're in much better shape now due to the business side of the site, which is something I neglected for the first years, hoping to keep it all free from "pesky ads". It just didn't work, obviously.

I had a post queued up earlier but didn't submit it because I didn't want to be spamming the thread, but honestly I think the advertising is pretty much dead on. (I browse on my tablet all the time without my lovely tools >.<)

You already know you will never make everyone happy. I think Neowin strikes a good balance of revenue raising and ad-i-ness (I don't know how to say that).

The idea of moving the add to the right edge is a pretty good one too. It also puts the nag right beside the ad to drive home the point >.<

If I gave the impression I was criticising at any point, that wasn't my intention. There is no answer that will make everyone happy, all you can do is try and balance what will keep most users happy and generate the most revenue.

All of which you already know.. These posts annoy me >.>

I know what you mean, we've generally not required registration at all.. but maybe we need to do a better job of relaying the benefits of signing up, which is why I hoped for some feedback on that :p The Facebook/Twitter connect buttons is a good start though.

I also visit Cracked.com (and am not registered) and even though I love the site, the popup that randomly appears asking me to register really annoys me, so I wouldn't do it here.

Good call.

  • Like 1

I had a post queued up earlier but didn't submit it because I didn't want to be spamming the thread, but honestly I think the advertising is pretty much dead on. (I browse on my tablet all the time without my lovely tools >.<)

You already know you will never make everyone happy. I think Neowin strikes a good balance of revenue raising and ad-i-ness (I don't know how to say that).

The idea of moving the add to the right edge is a pretty good one too. It also puts the nag right beside the ad to drive home the point >.<

If I gave the impression I was criticising at any point, that wasn't my intention. There is no answer that will make everyone happy, all you can do is try and balance what will keep most users happy and generate the most revenue.

All of which you already know.. These posts annoy me >.>

Good call.

Thanks (Y)

I'm also familiar with these huge adverts... as I'm seeing them when I'm "supposedly" logged in. When I refresh a page, or go back to the home page it turns out it's actually logged me out then the adverts are shown.

I can either log in, or completely close Safari, reopen it and I'm logged back in as usual. Cookie problem perhaps?

(Don't suffer this issue with Chrome, but I can't use Chrome on my new Macbook as it causes KPs).

Except we clearly state this at the top of the forums and the linked forum post. ;)

I think his point is that having the large intrusive ad will make people leave the site instead of signing up. You need to make the site as alluring as possible. People don't like advertisements so you need to put them in places that they aren't so obvious. This hurts revenue but as I suggested a few pages back there are other avenues you could exploit for money including partnering with a merchandiser that could sell cups, t-shirts and mouse pads with Neowins logo on them.

  • Like 3

I'm all for ads on sites unless they start becoming obnoxious or they default playing audio without user interaction than ad blocker goes up a. Yes, I'm paying for Tier II here; I think it puts more money in Neowin's pocket then ad revenue that comes from me.

  • Instead of slapping the large ad at the top of the site, how about like someone else said, overlay the ad in the center of the after a few seconds on the site?
  • Displaying an ad after clicking on news articles before displaying the content?
  • How about replacing the block of the three images right below the menus with the ad for a few seconds?

Ads are all fun and games until they become intrusive, and once they become intrusive, all bets are off. The last thing web admins want to do is annoy users and guests alike, because that hurts your bottom line just as much as "special" software does. :cool:

I'm not above white-listing, however, I see intrusive advertising as a breach of trust. Bandwidth is a commodity in some parts, and in others is quite expensive. I'm paying to connect to the web to see content, NOT so much ads. If they're going to get in my face, they're going to be blocked, but if they stay out of my way, I have no problems.

I think the point is not that users mind advertisements... but that they mind such a huge and ugly advertisement...

If it was smaller or fit into the style of the page, would be better but as it is atm it just looks out of place and excessive.

Can you get stats on how many people actually click that monstrosity?

EDIT: Above post appeared as I posted, maybe its time to find a better AD partner then?

Like i said earlier, we have certain terms for certain ads. Like required to be above the fold, etc. Top portion of the site, blah blah blah. If we could throw them in the footer, I think we would have :p

Definately need to find a new ad company. Ads need to fit the site not the site fitting around the ads.

There is nothing wrong giving feed back to these ad companies that you are receiving a lot feedback from the users complaining about your large ads and we are loosing unique visitors because of this and in turn you (ad company) are loosing impressions. So lets work on a compromise or we have to find a better fit for our site....

I'm all for ads on sites unless they start becoming obnoxious or they default playing audio without user interaction than ad blocker goes up a. Yes, I'm paying for Tier II here; I think it puts more money in Neowin's pocket then ad revenue that comes from me.

  • Instead of slapping the large ad at the top of the site, how about like someone else said, overlay the ad in the center of the after a few seconds on the site?
  • Displaying an ad after clicking on news articles before displaying the content?
  • How about replacing the block of the three images right below the menus with the ad for a few seconds?

This is just me, but I'd much rather have a big ad at the top of my screen than seeing something that covers my whole screen for a few seconds before I can get to a page. I'm perfectly comfortable with the current approach, but maybe I'm just biased.

further to my other post. This morning when I got on my computer neowin loaded up as normal(without being logged in) and after about 5 mins the full page was taken up by some tiny ad questionnaire?. This is on ie10 in windows 8, so it could have just been a bug in ie10 but not sure. I do not block ads but there must be a better way to use advertisers other than them taking up most of the screen space of the site. I do not want neowin to go back to the dark times of the server going down and problems with hosting etc., but the 1/3 page ad is just to much if your a new visitor and as already said the ad should fit to a site not the other way round and having those pop up full page or small ads are just plain wrong. I think the space on the right could be used more for adverts as this would not distract from the site or it contents as much.

When logged in the adverts are much better due to the size, less obtrusive on the eye and I think would make people who are interest in the product want to click more than the 1/3 of the page or full page ad's that some sites show but that's just my opinion.

You should take a look at ARS Tehnica. They make certain articles available only to subscribers for a certain amount of time, then they go to the public. Their ads are also much nicer. There's a small banner that's in the header of the page next to the logo. Then throughout their article listing, they have square ads. Having 4-5 ads on a page is a lot nicer than 1 giant one that pushes your content down. I for one nearly gave up on using Neowin because I was frequently getting those big ads, even when logged in.

It is great that the site admins and devs are paying attention to user feedback. It shows that they do care unlike other sites which are there just to generate revenue and a large user base.

Sure - as a visitor or non-paying member, you can go with the "beggars can't be chooser's" mentality. Seriously - if you don't like it, then don't use it. I know that ad revenue still works and obviously does quite well otherwise it wouldn't be all over the net so much.

I do have one issue with ads and it is the ads when you hover over certain words (in this case Vibrant). When I read text on pages sometimes I use my mouse to follow the words and ad providers know that behavior is common so this is why it is there, but to me - sometimes those ads get 'sticky' and won't clear the window when I move my mouse away. To me, that is very off-putting. But again, as a standard member, I have to live by the "Beggars can't be choosers' mentality. More often than not - the ads are truly tailored to this site and to be honest, I have learned about some new products and services as a result of some of them.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I am not a US citizen nor a Trump fan. Respect to both left and right. But I will, for the sake of fun, predict something for my own. There will come a day when the US and China will collide like titans ( over Taiwan or anything else ). Then, on that day, some people in this comment section will realize how good an idea it was to become independent in areas like that. ( Or atleast try )
    • Microsoft Edge gets tons of security features, including AI model that can see your screen by Usama Jawad Microsoft Edge may not be the most popular browser out there, but it does receive quite frequent updates that sometimes bring surprising new features and axe others that are not as popular. Now, Microsoft has detailed some of the new security enhancements that it has introduced in Edge for Business, typically used by commercial customers. Microsoft has emphasized that security features are baked into Edge for Business and offer native integration with security and governance tools like Defender and Purview. Browser sessions are governed by default on managed devices but can also be governed through dedicated work profiles on unmanaged devices. An important aspect in this area is controlling the use of shadow AI. We have talked about this before, but it essentially restricts employees from using unsanctioned AI apps through data loss prevention (DLP) policies, with Edge redirecting them to trusted AI services like Microsoft 365 Copilot. This feature, available as a pay-as-you-go (PAYG) license, ensures that confidential data never exits AI boundaries set by your organization in Purview. Additionally, Microsoft also has strong DLP policies for contractors. Contractors leveraging a Entra ID-joined work profile provisioned by their contracting company on a device managed by their actual employer can be restricted from downloading files locally. In such scenarios, the file is saved on the contracting firm's OneDrive rather than being downloaded locally. Another useful Edge security feature disallows copying and pasting from unmanaged locations and apps. Similarly, DLP policies can be configured at a granular level to restrict screenshots or downloading of files from certain locations. In the same vein, IT admins can block the installation of extensions, hosted apps, themes and scripts, and control if users can install extensions from external locations. They can also enable the installation of specific extensions and allow users to request access to certain extensions, so that they can be managed on a case-by-case basis. Finally, Edge for Business now has an on-device AI model that uses computer vision to see what's on your screen and block potentially malicious content immediately. This does not rely on site reputation, as it simply monitors what is being displayed on your screen, which means that it is effective against malicious content that takes over your screen and employs scareware tactics. Since this is an on-device AI model, it does use your system's resources, so it's enabled by default only on devices with at least 2GB of RAM and four CPU cores. You can find more details in the Microsoft Mechanics video here.
    • Could you come up with a slightly less depressing background for Tux instead of that gray gradient? Doesn't have to be cheerful, just less of a downer...
    • Linux 7.2's first release candidate gets off to a good start by Paul Hill Credit: Larry Ewing It has been a few weeks since the release of Linux 7.1, and in that time, the Linux 7.2 merge window has been open, where developers can submit their features and patches ready for the upcoming release. That window is now shut, and the release candidate phase has begun so that new features can be tested and further fixes applied. According to the founder of Linux, Linus Torvalds, this week’s release candidate looks “reasonably normal”. Although we are super early in the release candidates, this is a good sign as it makes it more likely that an eighth release candidate will not be needed. Torvalds even mentioned that the update’s stats are only larger than they really are because there was another AMD header drop with a third of the patch just being AMD GPU register definitions, which aren’t big changes but make the code contributed look larger overall. In addition to this, he noted that just over half the patch is drivers, even when excluding the AMD register dump. The rest of the changes are spread out over architecture updates, tooling, documentation, and core kernel updates. In the next week, Torvalds says that he will be chilling out, taking the week “mostly off”. Despite this, he will be reading emails and keeping up with things, so if he is slow responding, now you know why. He said he is hoping for a calm week, but we will just have to see if the second release candidate is actually like that. We should expect seven or eight release candidates before Linux 7.2 is released, so expect it around the end of August. If you missed it a few weeks ago, be sure to check out our coverage of Linux 7.1's release.
    • Ridiculous claim that the labor cost difference of $6000 annually would increase cost per phone by $200. The employees produce 3 phones per month or what?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Zeynel earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      JKR earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Dedicated
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      496
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      248
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      154
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      86
    5. 5
      macoman
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!