Recommended Posts

Hi guys

Have a bit of mistery issue that has cropped up and I'm trying to assit to look into it, but want to seek advice as so far nothing has stuck out.

The setup is a Windows 7 clients, mixture of 32 and 64bit SP1. Domain controller is Windows 2008 R2 SP1.

Domain controller is hosted on a VPS, no local DC on site. There is a S2S vpn between the office to the VPS server with a good up/down link between the two.

PC's are joined to the domain and functioning, its only this 1 niggly thing that has cropped up now when a user changes the password via CTRL + ALT + DELETE and it takes over 2 minutes from hitting the arrow to submit the change to getting a confirmation to say the password was changed. If you hit CTRL + ALT + DELETE whilst the screen is stuck on "Changing Password" with the wheel spinning then you get the confirmation that the password was changed and password definitely gets updated.

Anybody have any ideas on why the password change has a delay if you leave it to complete by itself?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1090377-slow-password-change-on-domain/
Share on other sites

I would start by checking the following:

  • DNS: Can it resolve the domain and all domain controllers? Are the IP addresses correct?
  • Run a diagnostic check for active directory. I can't remember how exactly but dcdiag sounds right.
  • Check event viewer on the domain controller and clients for any clues on related errors.
  • What domain functional level is the forest and domain? May want to raise them to Server 2008 R2 if not already.
  • How is the latency and bandwidth between the DC and client site?

I would start by checking the following:

  • DNS: Can it resolve the domain and all domain controllers? Are the IP addresses correct?
  • Run a diagnostic check for active directory. I can't remember how exactly but dcdiag sounds right.
  • Check event viewer on the domain controller and clients for any clues on related errors.
  • What domain functional level is the forest and domain? May want to raise them to Server 2008 R2 if not already.
  • How is the latency and bandwidth between the DC and client site?

Thanks for the response.

Latency between DC and client is around the 10ms mark average.

PC's can resolve the domain and DNS is correct with the settings being picked up from the server.

No issues found with DCDiag and event logs on server and client are clean with no obvious errors to highlight the cause of the delay.

At the moment my suggestion has been to put a local DC onsite which can then replicate to the VPS DC.

We had similar problems in our remote office. about 200 pc.s there XP SP3 and Windows 7 32/64-bits.

First we tried Slowlink mode and that helped much, but final solution was that we added RODC, now everything works nicly there.

  • 5 months later...

Can I bump this for a revisit for your thoughts please

I'm basically still experiencing the same issues as what I've already highlighted in my previous posts and what this user has posted here -> http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/itprovistanetworking/thread/06dce842-c6dc-4e1f-9f86-7fd7a0a55191

We have implemented a DC locally and there is a DC in a remote site linked via S2S, I've checked the PC logon server and it is the local server, not the remote server. But yet when I try and do a password change. IT JUST TAKES an age...

If there's a firewall between the computers and the DC, I would look at that... Typically dynamic RPC ports allocation. Try to restrict the ports used for RPC by the domain controllers and make sure the now fixed tcp port range is open on the firewall.

Have a look at these KBs

http://bensjibberjabber.wordpress.com/2011/07/26/configuring-domain-controllers-to-use-fixed-rpc-ports-behind-firewalls/

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/832017

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/154596

Something doesn't sound right withy the network setup. Could be active directory, could be Dns, could be replication..... Any event logs on the servers (system, application, security, Dns, replication).

Well AD replication tests out fine, No critical errors in my dcdiag and also dcdiag /test:dns and repadmin /showrepl * /errorsonly comes back clean. I can PM or post the outputs if it will help.

With regars to event logs, apart from some errors that may have been caused when I was changing some of the settings. There is nothing that stick out from the server end. Once again, I'm happy to get this posted if it will help. From the client (workstation) side, everything event wise is so clean, I wish something was erroring out.. :(

If there's a firewall between the computers and the DC, I would look at that... Typically dynamic RPC ports allocation. Try to restrict the ports used for RPC by the domain controllers and make sure the now fixed tcp port range is open on the firewall.

Have a look at these KBs

http://bensjibberjab...hind-firewalls/

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/832017

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/154596

Well the local DC and workstation are now all within the same network with obviously a firewall protecting that whole network. So don't think if the above will help, but will keep in mind.Windows firewall is disabled.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • This got me thinking, would you rather a self driving car prioritise protecting its passengers or everyone else? I'd choose the one that keeps me and my kids safest. At some point, these cars have to make those choices already, don't they? Wonder if we have a way to find out what way they lean.
    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      565
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!