Western Digital launches new Red branded Hard Disks


Recommended Posts

ttnVm.png

Western Digital has announced a new series of Hard Disks which join its current range of Green, Blue and Black Hard Disks. The new Red series are designed for Network Attached Storage appliances, Small Business Servers and Home Servers.

The new drives take the same energy considerations of the green series and combine that with enterprise level anti-vibration technology and time-limited error recovery (TLER) of the Black series.

These features make it the perfect citizen in any small to medium sized storage configuration. The TLER feature is especially important when the disk is used within a RAID Array as it allows the RAID Controller to handle disk-halting read errors which could otherwise cause the disk to stop communicating with the RAID controller resulting in array degradation and/or data loss.

The new Red series will arrive in three configurations, 1TB ($109), 2TB ($139) and 3TB ($189). All three disks feature 64MB of Cache and SATA 6Gb/s Interfaces.

Perhaps the most impressive part of these disks is their power consumption. All three drives are rated at no more than 4.6Watts during Read/Write operations and 0.6-Watt power consumption when in standby or sleep mode.

Read more @ Western Digital's Red Page

Original News Piece written by Vice

  • Like 1

PcPer has a detailled review of the drives here:

http://pcper.com/rev...ive-Full-Review

I so want to get these drives for my home server!

Thanks for posting that review & me too! - I think I'll probably end up buying a few of the 3TB models for my server.

Can someone explain to me what the difference would be in using this drive for a RAID arrange and using a "normal" 1TB oem drive?

If you read the article I wrote at the top it clearly explains that lol

To quote myself:

The TLER feature is especially important when the disk is used within a RAID Array as it allows the RAID Controller to handle disk-halting read errors which could otherwise cause the disk to stop communicating with the RAID controller resulting in array degradation and/or data loss.

Normal drives such as the Eco Green series by Western Digital do not support TLER and are not recommended for RAID use.

A "normal" drive can be many things, ranging from very suspect (Acer) to something quite solid (samsung).

This HDD, over a standard drive, will be more power efficient, more resistant to vibrations, and offer TLER (great, if you are actually running a raid... a non-issue otherwise). I think performance will be much of the same...but who really needs 100+ MBps from a network drive?

For an 'always on' solution, I think they're great - the good points of the Green AND improved life/durability! I wouldn't say go out and swap all your storage drives for these...but there is no reason to buy anything instead of these.

EDIT: If a raid gets stuck waiting on a member disk, it could all fall appart - but who really runs RAID-0 for a storage solution? If a member disk goes offline in any proper storage raid (1, 5, etc) then you reset the computer and it'll come back online if its jammed on a request)

yeah I got that from the OP :p but what would be the result in not using a disk with TLER? crash and burn?

Basically if one of the disks is unable to read something that the RAID controller has told it to, it can spend an exorbitant amount of time trying to locate that data. Hyperthetically lets say it spent 30-40 seconds trying to locate a 4KB sector. During this time the disk is not doing any other read/write for the RAID controller and its queue length is getting larger. The longer this goes on without the Hard Disk giving up and telling the RAID controller it simply can't find the data the higher the chance the RAID controller will think the Hard Disk has completely failed and drop it out of the array completely.

This is bad for a number of reasons. If you're using RAID0 you just lost all your data. If you're using RAID5 you just made your array vulnerable to a lengthy rebuild process which could cause another disk in your array to fail and then you've lost all your data.

Basically if one of the disks is unable to read something that the RAID controller has told it to, it can spend an exorbitant amount of time trying to locate that data. Hyperthetically lets say it spent 30-40 seconds trying to locate a 4KB sector. During this time the disk is not doing any other read/write for the RAID controller and its queue length is getting larger. The longer this goes on without the Hard Disk giving up and telling the RAID controller it simply can't find the data the higher the chance the RAID controller will think the Hard Disk has completely failed and drop it out of the array completely.

This is bad for a number of reasons. If you're using RAID0 you just lost all your data. If you're using RAID5 you just made your array vulnerable to a lengthy rebuild process which could cause another disk in your array to fail and then you've lost all your data.

Interesting! Thanks

I'm asking because in the next couple of months i'm thinking of upgrading my 6 yeard old build and was thinking of more reliable solutions than just plugging in an external hard drive for back up and I don't know much about RAID and what types of HDD's to use and whatnot, anyhow, thanks :)

Depending on the size of your storage, simply plugging in an extra hdd(internal or external) is a great and simple way to go about backups =) RAIDs are complex beasts, and are prone to going wonky (other people will tell you otherwise =P). For a simple storage solution you very rarely need the performance improvement that RAID1 offers.

If you have 8TB of storage, duplicating this volume is expensive...so going for something like RAID5 would be your best, albeit complex, bet.

Depending on the size of your storage, simply plugging in an extra hdd(internal or external) is a great and simple way to go about backups =) RAIDs are complex beasts, and are prone to going wonky (other people will tell you otherwise =P). For a simple storage solution you very rarely need the performance improvement that RAID1 offers.

If you have 8TB of storage, duplicating this volume is expensive...so going for something like RAID5 would be your best, albeit complex, bet.

naw I barely have around 300gb or more of photos and music, the thing is, I've already had an external WD fail, I sent it back for RMA ( still under warranty) Luckily I had the in computer back up, but it was that disk failure that got me thinkin, i've got 10+ years of photos in my PC that are worth saving and not losing. Yeah I keep reading RAID is too much of a hassle for backup, I really don't care about performance but, just being safe, anyho, no more thread hijacking :p

So I guess with the launching of new products ... factories in Asia must be caught up with production and now they can lower prices .... :crazy:

BLASPHEMY!!!

NEVER! :o

Glassed Silver:mac

i wonder if it will be handicapped like a green drive ?

also can't the tLR tool be used ? (WDTLER)

i know the Wdidle.exe tool worked great for my Green drive.

I used it as soon as i took it out of the static bag to improve head parking

i'm suspicious when they claim low power consumption.. there must be a reason for that ;)

[...]

i'm suspicious when they claim low power consumption.. there must be a reason for that ;)

Probably it's got to do with higher data density = less rpm needed for the same speed.

Glassed Silver:mac

Haha damn! I just got 2 Greens -.- Then again, being in Australia, we probably wont be able to get our mits on these for a few years yet =P

They're already available at a lot of Aussie computer stores - PCCaseGear and CentreCom just to name a couple ;)

i wonder if it will be handicapped like a green drive ?

also can't the tLR tool be used ? (WDTLER)

i know the Wdidle.exe tool worked great for my Green drive.

I used it as soon as i took it out of the static bag to improve head parking

i'm suspicious when they claim low power consumption.. there must be a reason for that ;)

In their newer green drives the TLER tool doesn't work. They have gone out of their way to cripple their own products so that they don't compete with their other products.

In their newer green drives the TLER tool doesn't work. They have gone out of their way to cripple their own products so that they don't compete with their other products.

Indeed, I was lucky enough to get four green drives before this policy was implemented, one failed, got a replacement under warranty but it wouldn't allow me to change the TLER :(

PcPer has a detailled review of the drives here:

http://pcper.com/rev...ive-Full-Review

I so want to get these drives for my home server!

Meh. You don't need TLER/RED/BLACK/ENTERPRISE drives for a home server. I'm using 8 Samsung HD204UI 2TB drives with a dell PERC 6/I controller in a case at home. The box has been going for over a year and a half 24x7, only going down for windows updates, or cleaning dust out. I have not had one single problem with any of the drives yet. These are commercial "Green" samsung 5400 RPM drives, and I got them for 69$ each. RAID5 reads/Writes 500MB/sec +, 0 errors, serving as a Web/Exchange/Hyper-V/fileserver/torrent box

This is overkill.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!