Bible study group no longer welcome at McDonald's

By Hum
in Real World News

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

Hum

Posted
Posted

A Christian ministry leader was reportedly told she could no longer hold Bible studies in a New Jersey McDonald's, despite having the sessions there for the past two years.

The Christian Post reports that Dawn Martinez, 33, began the ministry to transients and drug addicts in 2010, but was told last Wednesday by a McDonald?s manager that she could no longer hold the two-weekly events.

"She didn't tell me what happened, but she said there was a complaint and that we cannot have our Bible studies there anymore," Martinez said.

After pressing for an explanation, she was told that "people are getting offended," Martinez said.

Martinez, who could not be reached for comment, believes someone of Islamic faith was at the restaurant and may have been offended enough to make a complaint. Martinez said the religion had been a brief topic of discussion last week.

Ed Baim, the McDonald's franchise owner, told FoxNews.com in an email that the content of the group's meetings had "absolutely nothing to do with their being asked to move."

Baim pointed out that the restaurant has a small seating area with signs that inform customers about its no-loitering policy.

"While we're not able to accommodate groups, these folks are always welcome to visit the restaurant as customers," he said.

Fast-food restaurants are common destinations for informal meeting groups like Alcoholic Anonymous and other counseling organizations.

Starbucks, for example, told FoxNews.com in a statement that its stores are "designed" to be gathering places.

"We take great pride in being an environment where our customers and members of the community can come to relax, visit with each other and discuss things that are meaningful to them," a statement from Starbucks on Tuesday read.

source

Grand Master

Noir Angel

Posted
Posted

All it takes is one complaint to ruin everything. We can't offend even one person.

Oh wait, so when an airline does it to an Atheist they're just exercising their right as a business to exclude people from using their services, but the moment it's done to a Christian it's discrimination. I love how people's opinions on things like this flip flop depending on what the group being targeted by the business believes.

  • ahhell, temple_treefrog and +hedleigh
  • Like 3
Grand Master

Gone

Posted
Posted

Oh wait, so when an airline does it to an Atheist they're just exercising their right as a business to exclude people from using their services, but the moment it's done to a Christian it's discrimination. I love how people's opinions on things like this flip flop depending on what the group being targeted by the business believes.

I've been waiting for you. :|

It goes both ways, and discrimination should not occur for any reason whatsoever. I thought that tolerance would be in the United States in such a late era when I was little, however I learned that humans do not like ANYTHING different than them, unless they themselves are a unique individual.

Same thing happened back in the days with the Jim Crow laws. Religion, race, and sexual preference do not make somebody bad.

Edit: Also, really, McDonalds! Gah Taco Bell is much better!

  • dead.cell, Glassed Silver and DConnell
  • Like 3
Grand Master

Noir Angel

Posted
Posted

Precisely, it shouldn't be allowed for any reasons. So why is it that people are seemingly only up in arms about it when it involves Christians? For the record I don't support discrimination against Christians.

  • Glassed Silver and ahhell
  • Like 2
Grand Master

Noir Angel

Posted
Posted

Fox News always defends Churchism

Quite so. I'm sure we'll be having Uncle Rush or Glenn Beck telling us that this is just another liberal outrage or another step towards mass persecution of Christians within a few days. Fox seem to love creating social unrest.

Grand Master

Gone

Posted
Posted

Quite so. I'm sure we'll be having Uncle Rush or Glenn Beck telling us that this is just another liberal outrage or another step towards mass persecution of Christians within a few days. Fox seem to love creating social unrest.

Hey there, I enjoy watching Glenn Beck's board of mystery. The connections just can't be missed.

The media is biased all around. ALL AROUND! The left has their media, which makes a lot of money, and the right also has their media, which probably makes more money? Either way, lets agree that the reason news is reported how it is, is to make profit and to control the population. The better (more controversial) the story, the better ratings and thus more profit.

Also, social unrest divides the country allowing easy control of the masses.

Grand Master

Noir Angel

Posted
Posted

I'm not sure the leftist media is quite as crazy as Glenn, but just as biased? you have a point there, they are. I tend not to read newspapers or watch commercial news stations for that very reason in fact.

Veteran

moloko

Posted
Posted

All it takes is one complaint to ruin everything. We can't offend even one person.

I would complain too. I think it rude to do that there. go to a community center or a park. If the manager does not want you in the restaurant doing that, it is his/her right.

Grand Master

Charisma Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

I would complain too. I think it rude to do that there. go to a community center or a park. If the manager does not want you in the restaurant doing that, it is his/her right.

I don't know, I consider McDonald's a "public place", don't you? If someone got offended, it means they were basically eavesdropping on what another table was talking about. Can I get people kicked out of a restaurant because I overheard them saying I'm ugly and was offended by it? Honestly, this is no different. People need to mind their own damn business.

  • Sir Topham Hatt, Glassed Silver, Praetor and 5 others
  • Like 8
Grand Master

The Laughing Man

Posted
Posted

I don't know, I consider McDonald's a "public place", don't you? If someone got offended, it means they were basically eavesdropping on what another table was talking about. Can I get people kicked out of a restaurant because I overheard them saying I'm ugly and was offended by it? Honestly, this is no different. People need to mind their own damn business.

Mcdonalds of all places? Thats just weird, Isnt gluttony a sin. lol

Grand Master

Nick H. Supervisor

Posted
  • Supervisor
Posted

I'm not saying that McDonalds were right or wrong in their decision. However, if the Christians don't want to be singled out then I suggest they go hold their meetings somewhere else, somewhere dedicated to their beliefs where they have the right to preach whatever they want. Now if only there were buildings specifically designed for Christians...

Grand Master

jnelsoninjax

Posted
Posted

I don't know, I consider McDonald's a "public place", don't you? If someone got offended, it means they were basically eavesdropping on what another table was talking about. Can I get people kicked out of a restaurant because I overheard them saying I'm ugly and was offended by it? Honestly, this is no different. People need to mind their own damn business.

Exactly! Whereas McDonald's may not be the best place to hold bible study, as long as they were not being loud and/or obnoxious about the whole thing, why should McDonald's give a damn? These people obviously were paying customers...

Grand Master

WelshBluebird

Posted
Posted

Tbh I doubt this has anything to do with the religious aspect of it anyway, and is probably more to do with the reasoning given by the McDonalds franchise.

Simply, it is a store that is there to serve customers. If people are hanging around and are not buying things, then I fail to see why McDonalds should have to accommodate them. And I also fail to see what the point of mentioning Starbucks is, since McDonalds are not starbucks and are free to have their own rules.

Grand Master

WelshBluebird

Posted
Posted

Exactly! Whereas McDonald's may not be the best place to hold bible study, as long as they were not being loud and/or obnoxious about the whole thing, why should McDonald's give a damn? These people obviously were paying customers...

Because I doubt they were paying customers for the entire time of the class?

Perhaps they were taking the biscuit and buying small things that take 5 minutes to eat and then hanging around for 2 hours?

Can I get people kicked out of a restaurant because I overheard them saying I'm ugly and was offended by it?

You can get kicked out if the owner decides they do not want you there, so yes you could get people kicked out for what you suggest. Not likely of course, but you could. Especially if you are say the owners friend or whatever.

Grand Master

theyarecomingforyou

Posted
Posted
The Christian Post reports that Dawn Martinez, 33, began the ministry to transients and drug addicts in 2010, but was told last Wednesday by a McDonald?s manager that she could no longer hold the two-weekly events.

This is an individual policy by an individual store. There was no mention in the article of whether this group was even buying food / drinks there. If they weren't then you're talking about a group of homeless people and drug addicts taking up seats, scaring away customers and not buying anything. It very likely had nothing to do with them being Christian, though that is obviously the spin that Fox News would put on it.

I had to deal with similar things when I was manager of a busy Subway store a while back. It's not a problem allowing such meetings if it's quiet, if it doesn't disturb other customers and when they may buy something - I'd often open the customer area after it had closed for town support meetings. But if such a meeting receives complaints and is an inconvenience to the store it's simply not practical to let it continue.

  • oliver182 and Ice_Blue
  • Like 2
Grand Master

whitebread

Posted
Posted
Fast-food restaurants are common destinations for informal meeting groups like Alcoholic Anonymous and other counseling organizations.
That's BS. I've gone to both NA and AA and meetings are NEVER held at restaurants :laugh: . They're almost always held in a church.

The only time we would ever go to a restaurant is after the meeting.

Grand Master

+Nik Louch Subscriber²

Posted
  • Subscriber²
Posted
Martinez, who could not be reached for comment, believes someone of Islamic faith was at the restaurant and may have been offended enough to make a complaint.

So, they ASSUME it was someone of Islamic faith who complained... Based upon?

Moreover, McD is a restaurant, not a meeting place. I have worked there, and not once was it used for group meetings - moreover if people were sat and not eating, they'd often be moved on.

Grand Master

neufuse Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

That's BS. I've gone to both NA and AA and meetings are NEVER held at restaurants :laugh: . They're almost always held in a church.

The only time we would ever go to a restaurant is after the meeting.

Which brings up the question, why isn't a bible study group meeting at a ummm welll church?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Posts

    • New PowerToys update fixes memory leaks and other issues

      By Dutchie64 · Posted

      Yup, that's a doozy right there 😄
    • New PowerToys update fixes memory leaks and other issues

      By Dutchie64 · Posted

      It's a bundle of tools created by a variety of people, so things can go wrong sometimes. It's a great addition to Windows, and I use a lot of the tools on a daily basis. Also, it's still a 0.**** release so quick updates are to be expected 😉
    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried

      By Nas · Posted

      Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG

      By zikalify · Posted

      You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Windows 11 is getting redesigned taskbar settings in new build

      By Captain_Eric · Posted

      Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?

  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!