Recommended Posts

I am considering getting an SSD drive to boot up my windows OS but I'm rather inexperienced when it comes to this, I already have my windows on my HDD will I need to completely reinstall windows on my SSD or is there a method of transferring it?

How much memory does windows OS actually take up, I also play my fair share of games but if possible could I chose to install them on my hardrive instead of the SSD.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1093161-thinking-of-getting-an-ssd/
Share on other sites

My advice is: absolute performance IS NOT everything, you should spare your money on a fundamentally broken and unreliable technology like NAND Flash-based SSDs and go for a high-performance HDD: plenty of space, faster on newer hardware and operating systems and if/when the disk dies it should give you the time to backup/recover your data. You know what happens when an SSD dies? Your data disappears, instantly, and forever.

I'll wait for ReRAM or FeRAM-based SSDs to consider the chance to spend my money on this kind of storage device....

My advice is: absolute performance IS NOT everything, you should spare your money on a fundamentally broken and unreliable technology like NAND Flash-based SSDs and go for a high-performance HDD: plenty of space, faster on newer hardware and operating systems and if/when the disk dies it should give you the time to backup/recover your data. You know what happens when an SSD dies? Your data disappears, instantly, and forever.

I'll wait for ReRAM or FeRAM-based SSDs to consider the chance to spend my money on this kind of storage device....

You seem to know very little about NAND memory. It's actually much much more reliable than mechanical HDDs, so I'm not sure where you get your information from.

You seem to know very little about NAND memory. It's actually much much more reliable than mechanical HDDs, so I'm not sure where you get your information from.

Sorry but the one who knows very little about NAND flash it's you: memory cells are a long-term nightmare for anyone caring for his or her data.

I just recently got the Intel 330 180GB SSD for my new computer. It is fantastic. Worth every dime!

There is a utility with the Intel drives to transfer everything, and supposedly it works very well, though I didn't try it. I think you could pull it off just fine if you're not very expierienced.

My advice is: absolute performance IS NOT everything, you should spare your money on a fundamentally broken and unreliable technology like NAND Flash-based SSDs and go for a high-performance HDD: plenty of space, faster on newer hardware and operating systems and if/when the disk dies it should give you the time to backup/recover your data. You know what happens when an SSD dies? Your data disappears, instantly, and forever.

I'll wait for ReRAM or FeRAM-based SSDs to consider the chance to spend my money on this kind of storage device....

mkay, well it's not broken and SSDs are the future so, it sounds like youve never actually owned or used an SSD...

also, SSDs are used in a wide variety of business applications. those in IT are using SSDs for their datacenters so there has to be a certain level of confidence in NAND technology. not only are companies like OCZ and Fusion-IO using them for massive storage solutions, but other companies are using them in SANs for long-term storage as well as caching.

if your hard drive suddenly dies, your data goes w/ it too... you dont always have time to backup your data. also, SMART works great on SSDs and can predict failures. i own 4 SSDs and none of them have died. Vertex 30GB, Vertex 2 60GB, Intel X-25M 160GB, Crucial M4 512GB.

DOOVD - pick up a 60GB SSD for Windows and essential applications. you'll want to do a fresh install, and as others have mentioned, enable AHCI in the BIOS before you install Windows. as for games, you'll still be able to get 1 or 2 sizable games on that SSD if you want; otherwise, just install them on your hard drive. Windows takes between 15-20GB, and a 60GB SSD should format around 54GB leaving you with about 34GB for games and applications.

Sorry but the one who knows very little about NAND flash it's you: memory cells are a long-term nightmare for anyone caring for his or her data.

That's terrible advice! Every drive is going to die, regardless if it's SSD based or a mechanical HDD. Bottom line, SSD's are completely worth it, and it turns your existing system into a new beast. Remember, your computer's slowest component is the mechanical HDD. Just make sure you backup your data, as always - you never know when your SSD or HDD is going to fail.

SSDs with each generation are becoming more and more reliable. The first generate SSDs and even certain products from the newer generations have had problems, but this has mostly been down to dodgy firmware. An SSD in my opinion is likely to die like a HDD. I've had many hard drives die over the years.

I just installed a SSD in my machine with a fresh install of Win7, and I LOVE it! The old drive is still in there for storage for most things, documents and images and whatnot, but having the OS and most-used programs on a SSD has made such a difference in performance. Boots, loads things, opens programs so quickly. I'll never go back :D

That's terrible advice! Every drive is going to die, regardless if it's SSD based or a mechanical HDD. Bottom line, SSD's are completely worth it, and it turns your existing system into a new beast. Remember, your computer's slowest component is the mechanical HDD. Just make sure you backup your data, as always - you never know when your SSD or HDD is going to fail.

Exactly. Backing up your data will always be the number one advice when it comes to storage. It's a pre-caution measure and you'll be glad that your data is safe after a crash, power outage or a drive failure.

Sorry but the one who knows very little about NAND flash it's you: memory cells are a long-term nightmare for anyone caring for his or her data.

Use some common sense...

Mechanical parts wear out. You can't overcome physics.

NAND has no moving parts and have decades worth of read/write cycles, which will only continue to get better.

What you are claiming has nothing to do with reliability. Yes when a SSD dies, your data is gone, but so what? The same usually happens when a HDD dies unless it shows symptoms beforehand. But again, that has nothing to do with reliability.

Please at least have some background knowledge of the subject before you ramble out nonsense...

Sorry but the one who knows very little about NAND flash it's you: memory cells are a long-term nightmare for anyone caring for his or her data.

Yeah, you're wrong. I'm particularly amused that no-one picked up on "faster on newer hardware" as that's just complete tosh.

Nand doesn't degrade when not in use where as magnetic mediums do; So for pure storage (i.e. plug in, copy, unplug), the only downside of SSDs is cost. Even on scratch disks the drives survive for longer than the lifetime of the computer and S.M.A.R.T. is more accurate in predicting its impending death.

For those of us that are interested in performance the SSDs are immeasurably better due to their extremely low latency. Whilst I agree that performance isn't everything, this is a worthwhile performance boost.

SSDs with each generation are becoming more and more reliable. The first generate SSDs and even certain products from the newer generations have had problems, but this has mostly been down to dodgy firmware. An SSD in my opinion is likely to die like a HDD. I've had many hard drives die over the years.

Technically untrue. As the SSDs shrink in die size, the NAND memory becomes less durable and slower.

I would however agree that the firmware is a million times better now than it was then.

Sorry but the one who knows very little about NAND flash it's you: memory cells are a long-term nightmare for anyone caring for his or her data.

Anyone who really care about his or her data will not store them on the same HD as the OS and will also back them outside of his or her computer .

And shockingly this is what this guy is about to do. He plan to buy a SSD and install windows on it and keep the HDD to store his data and games. OMG that's revolutionary nobody does this. I recommend him to back important data to a disc (dvd), tape or external HDD too here and there to be safe.

Anyone who doesn't back up his or her data (SSD or HDD it doesn't matter) deserves to lose them one day or another.

"When a SSD fails, the failure is likely to be catastrophic, with total data loss. HDDs can fail in this way too, but often give warning that they are failing, allowing much or all of their data to be recovered". Also: wear leveling, bugged controllers with subsequent loss of data and some other issues I don't have time to research right now.

https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/SSD#Comparison_of_SSD_with_hard_disk_drives

For me, right now SSDs are a no-go. Miniaturization will bring this very limited and controller-dependent storage technology to an halt. NAND Flash isn't for storing data, not for me.

When I upgraded my mid-2009 MBP from a 4200 RPM HDD to an Intel SSD 320 120GB the performance difference was like night and day. It was a huge performance boost. The whole OS is snappier! It isn't like upgrading your video card and games work better...or upgrading your memory and that one time a week when you use it all you notice. Going from HDD->SSD is a big upgrade that helps with performance across the board.

You would think it would just be load times, but the way modern software is written the disk is constantly polled for information. Nothing is 100% loaded into memory when you load a program. For instance, any dialog box that you open is going to hit the hard drive. Use to Office 2011 on my Mac would just llaaaaagggg.... since upgrading to the SSD everything is snappier. Highly recommend one.

As far as the discussion about data reliability on HDD vs SSD, I really don't get the argument at all. Anything can fail. HDD or SSD can fail and you can end up in a position where NOTHING is recoverable. That's why all users need to be relentless at backing their data up. This arguing about HDD only failing 2% of the time while SSD will fail 3% of the time, therefore don't get an SSD is complete hogwash (numbers made up for dramatic effect).

'Thinking of getting an SSD.'

Yeah don't do that, just buy it. You won't regret it, I promise. ;)

"When a SSD fails, the failure is likely to be catastrophic, with total data loss. HDDs can fail in this way too, but often give warning that they are failing, allowing much or all of their data to be recovered". Also: wear leveling, bugged controllers with subsequent loss of data and some other issues I don't have time to research right now.

https://secure.wikim...ard_disk_drives

For me, right now SSDs are a no-go. Miniaturization will bring this very limited and controller-dependent storage technology to an halt. NAND Flash isn't for storing data, not for me.

I have a friend who has been using SSDs for YEARS. He works for a retailer and therefore gets to play about with them all the time (also to note is he has 8x SSDs on his personal machine). After all of these years he's had ONE SSD fail him. Now try and compare that to the amount of HDD fails he's had and you suddenly realize SSDs are less likely to fail.

you'd have to push many many terabytes of data through the SSD. i'm still using my 30GB Vertex from 2009...

It's also worth noting that in theory he's correct, since each block of the memory can only be written/erased a certain number of times. The controllers manage that though and therefore heavily prolong the life of them.

Saying you're not going to buy an SSD because you're worried about data loss is silly imo. You're missing out on a SIGNIFICANT performance increase and for what? Potential data loss? Lets say 4 years down the line it dies quite frankly if you don't have a backup of that drive, you've failed at computing 101.

  • Like 3
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Amazon may use OpenAI and Nova models after Anthropic reportedly raises costs by Karthik Mudaliar Amazon is reportedly considering to use OpenAI models and even its own Nova family of AI models after Anthropic raised the cost of using Claude inside Amazon services. According to a report from The Information, Amazon is weighing its options to reduce costs under a new arrangement with Anthropic. But back in April, Amazon said it would invest $5 billion more in Anthropic, with the possibility of adding up to another $20 billion if certain commercial milestones are met. That investment actually came on top of another $8 billion Amazon had already put into the Claude maker. Anthropic, meanwhile, committed to spend more than $100 billion over 10 years on AWS technologies, including Amazon’s Trainium chips. Amazon isn't just a customer of Anthropic but also one of the most important backers and cloud partners. This is why it makes it interesting that Amazon is considering other alternatives to handle its internal workloads. Although Amazon has been building its own options for a while now. Its Nova family of AI models was announced in late 2024 for Amazon Bedrock, with models aimed at text, image, and video tasks. Amazon pitched the model around cost and latency at that time. With that said, OpenAI has also become a more realistic option recently for AWS customers as well as for Amazon itself. Earlier this year, OpenAI brought its latest models and Codex coding agent to Amazon Bedrock, after changes to its previously more restrictive Microsoft cloud arrangement. This allowed AWS to serve even those customers who wanted other alternatives from Claude, without having to move workloads out of Amazon's cloud. Evaluating alternatives could also be due to commercial pressure and not necessarily a sign of a damaged partnership between Amazon and Anthropic. Whether or not Amazon is actually considering switching entirely to OpenAI's models or its own Nova models remains unknown at this moment.
    • Samsung introduces new AI classroom tools and interactive displays at ISTELive 2026 by Fiza Ali Samsung has announced several new education-focused software features and interactive displays for schools during ISTELive 2026, taking place in Orlando, Florida, from 28 June to 1 July. The focus of these updates is on making shared classroom displays easier to use for teachers while giving IT administrators more control over managing devices. One of the key additions is the Samsung Account Management Solution (AMS). In many schools, multiple teachers share the same interactive display throughout the day, which means signing in and setting everything up can become repetitive. With AMS, teachers can log in by scanning a QR code or tapping an NFC-enabled ID card. Once signed in, their personalised workspace, including wallpapers, bookmarks, app shortcuts, and files, can be instantly accessed through Home Personalisation. Samsung has also included a screen lock feature, allowing teachers to lock the display if they need to step away briefly. Furthermore, the company is also updating its Education Portal with new tools designed for school IT administrators. The portal will allow IT administrators to register teachers, enrol devices, and manage user access from a central dashboard. Administrators can also link NFC cards to teacher accounts, making sign-ins quicker across shared displays. Another addition is a Tags feature that lets schools organise displays by building or classroom. Those tags can also be used to send emergency notifications to selected Samsung Interactive Displays through compatible platforms such as InformaCast and Raptor. Moreover, the tech giant's AI Assistant is gaining several new features aimed at supporting everyday classroom tasks such as lesson planning and classroom engagement. One of the features is Circle to Search, which lets teachers circle text or images on the display to quickly find related information, videos, or web results without interrupting the lesson. The content can then be brought into Samsung Whiteboard. Another feature, Live Transcript, converts spoken lessons into real-time captions, which could be useful for students with hearing impairments or those in multilingual classrooms. The AI Assistant also introduces AI Summary and AI Quiz. The summary tool creates summaries of recorded lessons, while AI Quiz generates questions based on lesson content so teachers can quickly check how well students are following along. Teachers signed in through Samsung AMS can also return to their previous AI-generated lesson materials without logging in again. Alongside the software updates, Samsung has expanded its Android-based Interactive Display range with three new models: the WAF-S, WAFX-PS, and WAHX-M. The WAF-S and WAFX-PS ship with Android 16, bringing updates to security, accessibility, and overall usability while maintaining compatibility with Google's education services including Google Classroom and Google Drive through EDLA certification. Meanwhile, the new WAHX-M is the biggest addition to the lineup, introducing a 98-inch display for larger spaces such as lecture halls and conference rooms. It will also be available in 65-inch, 75-inch and 86-inch sizes. Samsung says the WAHX-M further includes on-device AI features such as voice commands, text-to-speech, and an AI calculator, alongside support for Samsung AMS and AI Assistant. Samsung AI Assistant has been available since April, while Samsung AMS and the updated Education Portal will begin rolling out in July.
    • It's been $24 (single) or $89 (4-pack) for many days on both Amazon and Walmart as far as I know. That isn't a big discount. If these end up like the 1st gen, the 4-pack will routinely get down around $80, give or take a dollar. I think they have even hit $69 at times.
    • Microsoft brings Claude to its own Azure infrastructure, powered by Nvidia GB300 Blackwell by Karthik Mudaliar Anthropic's Claude models are now generally available in Microsoft Foundry on Azure and are running on Nvidia's GB300 Blackwell Ultra systems. Nvidia wrote in its announcement that the models are hosted on Microsoft Azure and accelerated by GB300 Blackwell Ultra GPUs, with Quantum-X800 InfiniBand networking used to support larger agentic systems and specialized sub-agents that can operate across business domains. This is great for customers and enterprises that want to build autonomous and domain-specific AI agents using Claude without moving outside Microsoft’s cloud platform. Microsoft currently offers Claude models in Foundry in two forms: “Hosted on Azure,” which runs end-to-end on Azure infrastructure and is generally available, and “Hosted on Anthropic infrastructure,” which remains in preview. This separation is quite important for organizations that have procurement, compliance, data processing, or internal governance requirements tied to Azure. Anthropic currently has 11 Claude models listed in Microsoft Foundry, including Opus 4.8, Sonnet 4.6, and even the unavailable Mythos and Fable models. Billing is handled through Claude Consumption Units (CCUs). Microsoft says CCU is an invoicing unit for Claude models in Foundry, with token usage converted using Anthropic’s published per-model token rates. The usage is billed through Azure Marketplace just like models from other distributors and appears on the customer's Azure invoice, while eligible spend can count against a Microsoft Azure Consumption Commitment. For starters, GB300 NVL72 is a rack-scale, fully liquid-cooled system that combines 72 Blackwell Ultra GPUs and 36 Grace CPUs. Nvidia has listed 37TB of fast memory, 130TB/s of NVLink bandwidth, and FP4 Tensor Core performance of up to 1,440 petaflops with sparsity. The deal is also part of a three-way partnership between Microsoft, Nvidia, and Anthropic. Under the deal, Anthropic has committed to buying $30 billion in Azure compute capacity and contracting additional capacity up to one gigawatt. Nvidia and Microsoft also said they would invest up to $10 billion and $5 billion in Anthropic, respectively.
    • WhatsApp is getting usernames, and you can reserve your preferred one now by Fiza Ali Sharing your phone number isn't always something you want to do, especially with people you've just met. Whether it's someone from a class, a local community group, or a sports team chat, handing over your number can feel like giving away more personal information than necessary. That's exactly the problem WhatsApp is trying to solve with its upcoming usernames feature. The company has announced that users can now reserve a unique WhatsApp username ahead of the feature's wider rollout later this year. Once usernames become available, they'll let people connect without revealing their phone numbers. It's a change that makes a lot of sense for group chats. Right now, everyone in the group can see your phone number. With usernames enabled, that won't necessarily be the case when someone contacts you for the first time. WhatsApp says it's opening username reservations early because more than three billion people use the app, meaning plenty of people are likely to want the same usernames. Reserving one now gives users a better chance of securing the name they actually want before the feature launches more broadly. If your preferred username is already taken, WhatsApp will also offer a built-in username generator to suggest available alternatives. The feature isn't only aimed at individual users. Creators, businesses, and organisations will be able to claim the same username they already use on Instagram or Facebook, making it easier to keep a consistent identity across Meta's apps. Furthermore, privacy is a big part of how WhatsApp is introducing usernames. There won't be a public directory where people can browse or search for usernames. Instead, people will need to know your exact username before they can start a conversation with you. Additionally, users can also choose to enable a username key, which adds another layer of control by requiring people to enter that key before sending a message. Once the feature rolls out, people who choose to use a username will no longer have their phone number shown when messaging a person or business for the first time. If you want to reserve a username, make sure you're running the latest version of WhatsApp, then head to Settings > Account > Username. The tech giant says usernames will roll out gradually over the coming months, and users will receive an in-app notification when the feature becomes available in their country.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      536
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!