Google Begins Practically Begging You to Use Your Real Name on YouTube


Recommended Posts

Google Begins Practically Begging You to Use Your Real Name on YouTube

Pretty please?

YouTube comments are a notorious cesspool of sexism, racism and vitriol, and the fact that the vast majority of users go by anonymous handles probably doesn?t help mitigate the problem. Google appears to know this all too well?its obsession with keeping Google+ free of pseudonyms is a good indication that the company isn?t a big fan of anonymity.

Now, the search giant is taking its distaste for anonymity to a whole new level, instituting a pop-up dialogue box urging YouTube users to employ their real names.

When you try to comment on a YouTube video, a box will pop up that displays your username as it?s currently seen, along with a side-by-side comparison to what it will look like if you let YouTube pull your name from Google+. You can choose ?I don?t want to use my real name,? but that will lead to another dialogue box that basically guilts you into agreeing. If you still insist on remaining anonymous, you have to tell Google why: ?My channel is for a show or character? or ?My channel name is well-known for other reasons? are two options. ?I want to remain anonymous,? is?unsurprisingly?not one.

Google+ integration is a step beyond Google?s move last year that requires all YouTube users to login with a Gmail account. The company is clearly not a fan of anonymous users like ?HugeDouche.?

As noble as it may be, this whole concept?first brought to our attention by designer Jim Younkin?kind of misses the point: If people wanted to use their real names on YouTube, they?d just make their names visible on their YouTube channel. Most people don?t do this, and it?s probably because they?d like to remain anonymous.

Of course, forcing people to own their identities can help to elevate the discourse on YouTube videos, which is definitely in dire need of a makeover. But can a community that has relied on anonymity for so long really be convinced otherwise?

We reached out to YouTube to ask when and why they implemented this measure. We?ll update when we hear back.

UPDATE: A YouTube representative got back to us and said they began adding that option to existing users on June 29th, adding, ?Note that it is not only for commenting ? YouTube users with existing Google+ profiles see this option when they comment or upload a video.?

Source: betabeat.com via Slashdot

I've also been getting an annoying box that pops up every time I like or comment on a video saying "HEY DID YOU KNOW YOU HAVE A YOUTUBE CHANNEL?"

YES I KNOW, THERE'S LIKE 30 VIDEOS UPLOADED TO IT

  • Like 3

Good thing my youtube account isn't linked to my google+ account. My youtube is a google apps domain name, and a while back they forced me to seperate my google+ account because it no longer supported business accounts. Heh Heh, joke's on you google :)

I don't want people to know who I am. I use youtube to upload videos of my gaming mods. I don't want random people on forums to know my real name, there are too many creepy trolls out there.

No kidding. There are some ugly people out there...

That's the dumbest idea ever. I don't want a ****ing G+ account.

Agreed a million percent!

If they force me to say my real name, don't worry my dear. I already prepared a fake name, anyway.

*makes a smartass smirk*

If this is their idea to clean up the comments they are failing miserably. Even if they somehow forced you to use your real name it wouldn't matter, people post idiotic and racist things on Twitter and Facebook under their real name all the time. The only way to fix it is to hire moderators and ban accounts that post stuff like that, or improve the ability for the community to remove them. Either that or just get rid of comments.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Google pitches Spanner as one database for all AI agents with these new featues by Karthik Mudaliar Google Cloud is introducing new features within Spanner, its distributed database, as a place where enterprises should keep their data, using which AI agents could make smarter and better decisions. In a detailed blog post, Google highlighted quite a few features coming to Spanner, including relational data, graph relationships, vector search, key-value access, full-text search, and operational analytics together in one database architecture. Google says that today's systems aren't well-made for AI agents. There could be data that is present in one system, search indexes in another, embeddings in a vector database, and relationship data in a graph database. This fragmentation isn't great for AI agents to do their jobs because they don't have access to all of this data in one place. This is where Google is positioning Spanner as a solution. Spanner is already a globally distributed relational database with strong consistency, and Google wants its customers to see it as a broader data layer for AI applications. The company introduced something called Spanner Graph, along with integrated vector search, full-text search, a Cassandra-compatible key-value endpoint, and a columnar engine for analytical queries on operational data. Google also added that its ScaNN-powered vector search can support indexes with more than 10 billion vectors, while the columnar engine can make some analytical scans up to 200 times faster. All of this isn't just exclusive to the Google Cloud Platform, and there's support for multi-cloud as well. This comes via Spanner Omni, which Google says is a downloadable, containerized version of Spanner that can run on Kubernetes and in environments outside Google Cloud, including Microsoft Azure and AWS, and even on-premises infrastructure as well as edge deployments. Google says that customers who are interested in the full-featured edition should contact the company, and there's no word on commercial availability or separate pricing. Those interested can read the full blog by Google Cloud, which details these features individually.
    • Kalmuri 4.2.5 by Razvan Serea Kalmuri is your all-in-one, portable screen capture and recording solution designed for speed, simplicity, and flexibility. Whether you need a full-screen snapshot, a custom area, a scrolling webpage, or smooth video recording, Kalmuri delivers with ease. Capture text instantly from images with built-in OCR, keep floating images on top for quick reference, and use the precise color picker for perfect design matching. Customize hotkeys to work your way and share results instantly with built-in upload options. Kalmuri runs without installation, making it ideal for USB use, and offers an intuitive interface that’s easy to learn. Kalmuri key features: Video recording support (designation of whole screen and area) Whole screen, active program, window control, area application Extract text from images using optical character recognition (OCR). Support for PNG, JPG, WEBP, BMP, GIF file formats MP4 video recording powered by FFmpeg for high-quality results Full web page capture Share the captured image on the web Color extraction function Printer output Hotkey settings Adjustable via keyboard for area capture (Arrow key, Ctrl+Arrow key, Shift+Arrow key) File name format (sequential, datetime) Free to use it at work, at home, in government offices, at school, etc. Using Kalmuri portable for video recording Kalmuri’s portable version doesn’t include FFmpeg, which is required for video recording. Without it, you’ll get an “error FFmpeg.exe not found” message. To fix this, download FFmpeg from the provided link, extract it, and place FFmpeg.exe in Kalmuri’s folder. Kalmuri will then recognize it automatically, allowing you to start recording in high quality instantly. Kalmuri 4.2.5 changelog: Fixed an intermittent crash when using Area Capture Improved stability for Area Capture and screen recording Resolved a capture issue that could occur right after startup Download: Kalmuri 4.2.5 | 24.2 MB (Freeware) Download: Kalmuri Portable 4.2.5 | 2.1 MB View: Kalmuri Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • They have lots of info on me, I have a facebook account and have done so for years, it was the thing to have then. My phone number is not on it. I don't have the Facebook app on my phone these days, just the messenger part, and only for a couple of people to contact me, most will text me via SMS or phone. I agree, Meta, like others, even without an account will know something about me. Just have to try and keep some things private Also, never saw the need for Whatsapp, people used to ask for me to join it, but as I said to them, I have SMS and a phone, use that, or email
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      Juan Dela earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Collagen Project earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      Wakeen1966 earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      271
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      145
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      54
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!