Welcome Guest! To access all forums & features, please register an account or sign-in. → Why register?



Apollo Moon flags still standing, images show


26 replies to this topic - - - - -

#16 what

    Neowinian UNSTOPPABLE

  • 7,387 posts
  • Joined: 04-December 06
  • Location: Kent, England

Posted 30 July 2012 - 21:32

View Postperochan, on 30 July 2012 - 21:09, said:

NASA took very nice pic of far away galaxy and they couldnt take a very nice pic of the... moon???
Ah right, you don't have a clue what you're talking about. I thought you just had a minor brain fart in your original comment.


#17 mudslag

    I live in your head

  • 7,239 posts
  • Joined: 16-September 06
  • Location: Northwest Chicago burbs

Posted 31 July 2012 - 03:47

View PostHum, on 30 July 2012 - 20:50, said:

Yeah, that blob convinces me. :laugh:

And that bigger blob looks like a fully intact L.E.M. -- wonder how NASA explains that. :shiftyninja: Astronauts musta climbed up a rope ...


For someone who is always pulling pictures out of your rear end and claiming UFOs, it's funny how quickly you turn a 180 on something that has even more evidence then just a photo.

View PostBajiRav, on 30 July 2012 - 20:47, said:

I don't have any doubt about moon landing but those pixelated photos are hardly any proof to satisfy those conspiracy nutters.


This has nothing to do with proving anything to the tin foilers out there.

View Postn_K, on 30 July 2012 - 21:03, said:

'mostly' still standing? There's no air on the moon so the only thing that'd move it is the gravity exhurted on it by Earth and other planets, and the Sun... So I'm still skeptical.



skeptical of what exactly?

#18 *RedBull*

    skippy de do da

  • 4,640 posts
  • Joined: 30-March 06
  • Location: Everywhere and No where
  • OS: Windows 8 professional
  • Phone: Android

Posted 02 August 2012 - 14:28

Take note world, the moon belongs to the USA. Just accept it.

#19 Draconian Guppy

    Neowinian DOMINATING

  • 8,756 posts
  • Joined: 22-August 04
  • Location: Neowin

Posted 02 August 2012 - 14:44

Hmmm like hum states... Blobs...

I will say this: Calculating angles and distance of shadow cast, with a better resolution image (which i'm %100 NASA CAN get) math + physics, this could be proven to a 99.99 leaving 0.01 for skeptics. But, until then, pixelated blobs are meh at best.

#20 Hum

    totally wAcKed

  • 54,273 posts
  • Joined: 05-October 03
  • Location: Odder Space
  • OS: Windows XP, 7

Posted 03 August 2012 - 03:40

View PostTurion, on 02 August 2012 - 14:28, said:

Take note world, the moon belongs to the USA. Just accept it.

Patent Pending :ninja:

#21 Tha Bloo Monkee

    This is my member title.

  • 3,260 posts
  • Joined: 03-July 04
  • Location: Ontario, Canada

Posted 03 August 2012 - 03:56

I'm not disputing the moon landing, but these pictures don't prove anything...
:/

#22 mudslag

    I live in your head

  • 7,239 posts
  • Joined: 16-September 06
  • Location: Northwest Chicago burbs

Posted 05 August 2012 - 23:46

View PostTha Bloo Monkee, on 03 August 2012 - 03:56, said:

I'm not disputing the moon landing, but these pictures don't prove anything...
:/


Again these pictures are not meant to prove or disprove anything, just showing a detailed shot that just happens to show what appears to be a standing flag still.

#23 compl3x

    Saved By The Buoyancy Of Citrus

  • 3,750 posts
  • Joined: 06-December 09
  • Location: Melbourne
  • OS: W7-HP

Posted 05 August 2012 - 23:57

View PostMephistopheles, on 30 July 2012 - 20:43, said:


Can we put the 'moon landing was a hoax' conspiracy theories to rest now, please?

We should have been able to put it to rest years ago.

View Postperochan, on 30 July 2012 - 21:09, said:

NASA took very nice pic of far away galaxy and they couldnt take a very nice pic of the... moon???

I think they use different types of equipment to take images of galaxies. Radio telescopes or something.

#24 Detection

    Detecting stuff...

  • 8,369 posts
  • Joined: 30-October 10
  • Location: UK
  • OS: 7 SP1 x64

Posted 06 August 2012 - 00:31

I thought the moon was bombarded with meteors and asteroids (whatever the difference is) all the time, and not one has obliterated a couple of measly flags ?

#25 Hum

    totally wAcKed

  • 54,273 posts
  • Joined: 05-October 03
  • Location: Odder Space
  • OS: Windows XP, 7

Posted 06 August 2012 - 00:35

^ More likely the Moon was 'bombarded' on its way to our Earth orbit. ;)

#26 Dan~

    Neowinian Senior

  • 2,508 posts
  • Joined: 21-May 03
  • Location: Southampton, UK

Posted 06 August 2012 - 13:27

Looks like someones face with acne, that's all...

#27 mudslag

    I live in your head

  • 7,239 posts
  • Joined: 16-September 06
  • Location: Northwest Chicago burbs

Posted 06 August 2012 - 21:22

View PostDetection, on 06 August 2012 - 00:31, said:

I thought the moon was bombarded with meteors and asteroids (whatever the difference is) all the time, and not one has obliterated a couple of measly flags ?

Yes and no, it is still bombarded but not in the same way that made the face of the moon what it looks like today. It's usually much smaller and less damaging based on the size of the meteors. Asteroids are the large rocks floating around in space. Meteors are the ones that strike an object like a planet. Meteorites are the ones that survive and hit the ground without vaporizing. I also believe it's the back side of the moon that gets bombarded more then the side that faces us.