26 replies to this topic

[what]

perochan, on 30 July 2012 - 21:09, said:

NASA took very nice pic of far away galaxy and they couldnt take a very nice pic of the... moon???

Ah right, you don't have a clue what you're talking about. I thought you just had a minor brain fart in your original comment.

[mudslag]

Hum, on 30 July 2012 - 20:50, said:

Yeah, that blob convinces me.

And that bigger blob looks like a fully intact L.E.M. -- wonder how NASA explains that. Astronauts musta climbed up a rope ...

For someone who is always pulling pictures out of your rear end and claiming UFOs, it's funny how quickly you turn a 180 on something that has even more evidence then just a photo.

BajiRav, on 30 July 2012 - 20:47, said:

I don't have any doubt about moon landing but those pixelated photos are hardly any proof to satisfy those conspiracy nutters.

This has nothing to do with proving anything to the tin foilers out there.

n_K, on 30 July 2012 - 21:03, said:

'mostly' still standing? There's no air on the moon so the only thing that'd move it is the gravity exhurted on it by Earth and other planets, and the Sun... So I'm still skeptical.

skeptical of what exactly?

[*RedBull*]

Take note world, the moon belongs to the USA. Just accept it.

[Draconian Guppy]

Hmmm like hum states... Blobs...

I will say this: Calculating angles and distance of shadow cast, with a better resolution image (which i'm %100 NASA CAN get) math + physics, this could be proven to a 99.99 leaving 0.01 for skeptics. But, until then, pixelated blobs are meh at best.

[Hum]

Turion, on 02 August 2012 - 14:28, said:

Take note world, the moon belongs to the USA. Just accept it.

Patent Pending

[Tha Bloo Monkee]

I'm not disputing the moon landing, but these pictures don't prove anything...

[mudslag]

Tha Bloo Monkee, on 03 August 2012 - 03:56, said:

I'm not disputing the moon landing, but these pictures don't prove anything...

Again these pictures are not meant to prove or disprove anything, just showing a detailed shot that just happens to show what appears to be a standing flag still.

[compl3x]

Mephistopheles, on 30 July 2012 - 20:43, said:

Can we put the 'moon landing was a hoax' conspiracy theories to rest now, please?

We should have been able to put it to rest years ago.

perochan, on 30 July 2012 - 21:09, said:

NASA took very nice pic of far away galaxy and they couldnt take a very nice pic of the... moon???

I think they use different types of equipment to take images of galaxies. Radio telescopes or something.

[Detection]

I thought the moon was bombarded with meteors and asteroids (whatever the difference is) all the time, and not one has obliterated a couple of measly flags ?

[Hum]

^ More likely the Moon was 'bombarded' on its way to our Earth orbit.

[Dan~]

Looks like someones face with acne, that's all...

[mudslag]

Detection, on 06 August 2012 - 00:31, said:

I thought the moon was bombarded with meteors and asteroids (whatever the difference is) all the time, and not one has obliterated a couple of measly flags ?

Yes and no, it is still bombarded but not in the same way that made the face of the moon what it looks like today. It's usually much smaller and less damaging based on the size of the meteors. Asteroids are the large rocks floating around in space. Meteors are the ones that strike an object like a planet. Meteorites are the ones that survive and hit the ground without vaporizing. I also believe it's the back side of the moon that gets bombarded more then the side that faces us.