Recommended Posts

Apollo Moon flags still standing, images show

_61904330_61904329.jpg

John Young salutes the flag while jumping in this picture taken by Charles Duke on the Apollo 16 mission

Images taken by a Nasa spacecraft show that the American flags planted in the Moon's soil by Apollo astronauts are mostly still standing.

The photos from Lunar Reconaissance Orbiter (LRO) show the flags are still casting shadows - except the one planted during the Apollo 11 landing.

This matches Buzz Aldrin's account of the flag being knocked over by engine exhaust as Apollo 11 lifted off.

LRO was designed to produce the most detailed maps yet of the lunar surface.

Each of the Apollo missions planted an American flag in the soil at their landing sites.

Scientists had previously examined photos of the Apollo landing sites for the flags, and had seen what looked like shadows cast by them on the lunar surface. But this was not considered conclusive.

Now, researchers have studied photos of the landing sites taken at different points during the day (and under different illuminations) and have observed shadows circling the points where the flags are thought to be.

Prof Mark Robinson, the chief scientist for the spacecraft's camera instrument, LROC, said in a blog entry: "From the LROC images it is now certain that the American flags are still standing and casting shadows at all of the sites, except Apollo 11."

The Arizona State University scientist added: "The most convincing way to see that the flags are still there, is to view a time series of LROC images taken at different times of day, and watch the shadow circle the flag."

"Personally I was a bit surprised that the flags survived the harsh ultraviolet light and temperatures of the lunar surface, but they did. What they look like is another question (badly faded?)"

LRO began its mission in lunar orbit in September 2009, to identify mineral and other resources on the Moon as well as scout promising landing sites for future missions.

_61904332_61904331.jpg

This image from the LROC camera shows the Apollo 16 flag - and its shadow - today

Source: BBC News

Can we put the 'moon landing was a hoax' conspiracy theories to rest now, please?

why always the evidence images are always blurry? stupid. NASA has no HD quality camera.... geez...

It's a view of a 50m^2 area from 50km away.

'mostly' still standing? There's no air on the moon so the only thing that'd move it is the gravity exhurted on it by Earth and other planets, and the Sun... So I'm still skeptical.

You read the first line. Now read the third one down.

'mostly' still standing? There's no air on the moon so the only thing that'd move it is the gravity exhurted on it by Earth and other planets, and the Sun... So I'm still skeptical.

Missed this part, I guess:

The photos from Lunar Reconaissance Orbiter (LRO) show the flags are still casting shadows - except the one planted during the Apollo 11 landing.

This matches Buzz Aldrin's account of the flag being knocked over by engine exhaust as Apollo 11 lifted off.

NASA took very nice pic of far away galaxy and they couldnt take a very nice pic of the... moon???

You do realize how big a galaxy is, right?

'mostly' still standing? There's no air on the moon so the only thing that'd move it is the gravity exhurted on it by Earth and other planets, and the Sun... So I'm still skeptical.

Well tourists in the low-flying UFOs knocked a few over. :p

I don't have any doubt about moon landing but those pixelated photos are hardly any proof to satisfy those conspiracy nutters.

I know! I believe that it's up there, but how in the world can they say without a doubt that that pixel is the flag? LOL

Yeah, that blob convinces me. :laugh:

And that bigger blob looks like a fully intact L.E.M. -- wonder how NASA explains that. :shiftyninja: Astronauts musta climbed up a rope ...

For someone who is always pulling pictures out of your rear end and claiming UFOs, it's funny how quickly you turn a 180 on something that has even more evidence then just a photo.

I don't have any doubt about moon landing but those pixelated photos are hardly any proof to satisfy those conspiracy nutters.

This has nothing to do with proving anything to the tin foilers out there.

'mostly' still standing? There's no air on the moon so the only thing that'd move it is the gravity exhurted on it by Earth and other planets, and the Sun... So I'm still skeptical.

skeptical of what exactly?

Hmmm like hum states... Blobs...

I will say this: Calculating angles and distance of shadow cast, with a better resolution image (which i'm %100 NASA CAN get) math + physics, this could be proven to a 99.99 leaving 0.01 for skeptics. But, until then, pixelated blobs are meh at best.

I'm not disputing the moon landing, but these pictures don't prove anything...

:/

Again these pictures are not meant to prove or disprove anything, just showing a detailed shot that just happens to show what appears to be a standing flag still.

Can we put the 'moon landing was a hoax' conspiracy theories to rest now, please?

We should have been able to put it to rest years ago.

NASA took very nice pic of far away galaxy and they couldnt take a very nice pic of the... moon???

I think they use different types of equipment to take images of galaxies. Radio telescopes or something.

  • Like 1
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google's new hand-wave reCAPTCHA can be bypassed with a stock photo by Ivan Jenic Image: Screenshot Google is testing a new reCAPTCHA method that asks you to wave at your camera to prove you're human. So, besides solving puzzles and reading distorted text, you can now use your computer’s camera to pass the verification test. When the hand gesture verification is triggered, your browser asks for camera access and prompts you to perform a simple gesture, like a wave or an open palm. Google says it records a short video of the movement and uses AI to extract 21 hand-knuckle coordinates to complete the verification process. The video is then immediately deleted, and Google swears it doesn't keep it. The process alone can be uncomfortable for people who wouldn’t want their biometric data, which hand scans technically qualify as, recorded. But it gets even more nuanced, as early testers discovered that the new hand-waving reCAPTCHA can be passed with a simple stock image. A user on X tested the new challenge using a stock image of a hand fed through OBS Virtual Camera, and it passed. I wanted to verify it, so I tried the same thing. It took me a few tries and a few stock images, but in the end, I was also able to pass the test. I simply had to readjust the stock image of a generic person waving inside OBS, and Google’s mechanism registered it as a legitimate hand gesture. Once again, it didn’t even have to be a video or an AI-generated hand animation. Given the simplicity of the process, the entire action can be automated in minutes. All it takes is a simple Python script to render the new reCAPTCHA method obsolete. And it doesn’t even have to be an AI bot, which is usually used for solving puzzles and other verification methods. The new reCAPTCHA method is still in its early phase, and Google will, hopefully, update its AI to at least reject still images. However, this incident, combined with users’ initial skepticism about Google’s practices regarding user data, likely won’t make too many people wave at the camera anytime soon.
    • 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 "to fund healthcare and tuition" 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Who do you think you are talking about, some COMMUNIST? We are better than them, doG bless Murica!!! p.s. I'm from a country where government does exactly that, i.e. not form US.
    • Apparently not. I know it is on Edge for business at the moment, but how long will it be before it become on the home version of Edge?
    • Microsoft details new Edge for Business security features, including AI-powered scareware detection So Edge is adding a "scarecrow." Will it be animated?
    • I have this one and it's great, also paired with a Mac. I like the white back aesthetics of it and ability to have all your wireless usb peripherals under a clean lid. 4K @ 120 Hz and 65W usb-c charging is not bad even at its typical price point. The U series is probably better for commercial photo work though; IIRC one reason this one is priced in a different bracket is because it's not calibrated and verified for optimal color accuracy. Not something I think of in daily use, coding, and light gaming though.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Apprentice
      Asgardi went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      sunrisea2milk earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      sunrisea2milk earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Snow Day Calculator Alert earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Conversation Starter
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      495
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      251
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      154
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      86
    5. 5
      macoman
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!