Recommended Posts

I'm new to the whole managed switches thing, so I am completely lost right now. I have two buildings that are right next to each other, they are connected by fiber. The fiber terminates into unmanaged switches on both ends. This keeps the workstations/servers in both buildings connected to each other. Internet comes into one building, and we use an NSA 240 as our router/firewall. We have one SonicPoint connected directly to the NSA to provide wireless, there are two SSIDs (corporate and guest) broadcasting from the SonicPoint. Now we need to put two SonicPoints in the other building. I purchased two Dell PowerConnect 5524 switches thinking that we could use VLANs to connect the two new SonicPoints to the NSA. The SonicPoints need to be directly connected to a port on the NSA, I am thinking I could use VLAN's to trick the SonicPoints into thinking they are directly connected to the NSA. I figured I'd put one 5524 into each building, plug the fiber into each to connect the building, and then set up VLANs for workstation traffic and SonicPoint traffic. Problem is, I have no idea where to start. I've looked over the documentation multiple times, but I'm confused about access vs general vs trunk and native VLANs and PVIDs and everything else. Can someone please point me in the right direction? Thanks!

The sonicpoints need to be connected to the wlan port (which could by any port!), at this point if you want to allow wlan traffic to the lan, you have to bridge the two ports, and have ALL of your sonicpoints connected to a switch which connects to the wlan. You cannot and will not be able to use ANY sonicpoint on the LAN segment. A firmware update I believe will make the sonicpoints in the future become regular APs and be use on the LAN segment, but until then you have to use them on the wlan segment.

Not sure why you think you needed to introduce vlans for?

from the sonicpoint deployment guide

Layer 2 and Layer 3 considerations for SonicPoints

SonicWALL uses two proprietary protocols (SDP and SSPP) and both *cannot* be routed across any layer 3 device. Any SonicPoint that will be deployed must have an Ethernet connection back to the provisioning SonicWALL UTM appliance, in the same broadcast domain/network.

SonicWALL UTM appliance must have interface or sub-interface in same VLAN/broadcast domain as SonicPoint.

SonicPoints must be able to reach the DHCP scope on the SonicWALL; make sure other DHCP servers are not present on VLAN/broadcast domain.

Sharing SSIDs across SonicPoints attached to multiple interfaces may case connectivity issues as wireless client roams to different SonicPoint subnet.

From how you have described your network, your devices are all on the same broadcast domain. You should be able to plug your new sonicpoints into any port on the switch(es) in the other building without issue.

You do not need to use vlans from what I can see.

The sonicpoints need to be connected to the wlan port (which could by any port!), at this point if you want to allow wlan traffic to the lan, you have to bridge the two ports, and have ALL of your sonicpoints connected to a switch which connects to the wlan. You cannot and will not be able to use ANY sonicpoint on the LAN segment. A firmware update I believe will make the sonicpoints in the future become regular APs and be use on the LAN segment, but until then you have to use them on the wlan segment.

Currently the one SonicPoint is connected to the WLAN port, and we've bridged it to the LAN port so people on the corporate SSID can access servers/etc. But now I need to connect two more SonicPoints in the building across the street. Because I cannot physically plug the two SonicPoints into the back of the NSA, I need to find a way fool them into thinking they are.

Not sure why you think you needed to introduce vlans for?

from the sonicpoint deployment guide

Layer 2 and Layer 3 considerations for SonicPoints

SonicWALL uses two proprietary protocols (SDP and SSPP) and both *cannot* be routed across any layer 3 device. Any SonicPoint that will be deployed must have an Ethernet connection back to the provisioning SonicWALL UTM appliance, in the same broadcast domain/network.

SonicWALL UTM appliance must have interface or sub-interface in same VLAN/broadcast domain as SonicPoint.

SonicPoints must be able to reach the DHCP scope on the SonicWALL; make sure other DHCP servers are not present on VLAN/broadcast domain.

Sharing SSIDs across SonicPoints attached to multiple interfaces may case connectivity issues as wireless client roams to different SonicPoint subnet.

From how you have described your network, your devices are all on the same broadcast domain. You should be able to plug your new sonicpoints into any port on the switch(es) in the other building without issue.

You do not need to use vlans from what I can see.

I think this isn't working for us because we've bridged the wireless and lan ports on the NSA unit.

If you have bridged the wlan to lan, then you can plug into any lan port. If you connect to other dumb switches, you could connect to any of them. Your on one big dumb broadcast domain. So you can plug in anything anywhere and get anywhere that is plugged into any other port on any of the switches, etc.

So again I am no seeing where you need to setup vlans, or what this is going to do - since you don't have any setup now.

No where in the guide does it say you have to be directly connected to anything, nor does setting up a vlan accomplish that even if did.

I am looking at the picture of the nsa 240 -- where is this WLAN port you talk about? Says it can support up to 16 sonicpoints - it clearly does not have 16 ports ;) So not sure what you are talking about with a WLAN port

post-14624-0-65038600-1343825172.png

The individual ports are "programmable", so you can define a port as WAN, LAN, WLAN, etc. In our case, port X6 is the WLAN port, it's bridged to X0 (the LAN port). Port X6 also has a VLAN so we can have two SSIDs running off one SonicPoint.

Capture.jpg

Just wanted to come back and let everyone know that I got this to work. I had to set up the same VLAN's on the switches that were created in the Sonicwall, and then trunk the switch to the Sonicwall. Created access ports for the SonicPoints and was good to go. Thanks for the help everyone!

  • 1 year later...

I'm trying to configure pretty much the same setup. Can you give me more information on how you connected the Sonicwall to your network switches?  Di you plug X0 and X2 into the same switch?  If so, how were they provisioned?  Did you set them up as an aggregate/trunk?

 

If I plug a SonicPoint into X2 it works just the way I want. I'm not sure how to "extend" that XO port to my switches?  I have tried a few ways but each time I lose DHCP on the Geast WLAN.

 

Thanks

  • 2 months later...

I'm trying to configure pretty much the same setup. Can you give me more information on how you connected the Sonicwall to your network switches?  Di you plug X0 and X2 into the same switch?  If so, how were they provisioned?  Did you set them up as an aggregate/trunk?

 

If I plug a SonicPoint into X2 it works just the way I want. I'm not sure how to "extend" that XO port to my switches?  I have tried a few ways but each time I lose DHCP on the Geast WLAN.

 

Thanks

Hello, 

 

I recently completed a 25 Sonicpoint deployment for a school.  My recommendation for a secure and stable installation.  You should get a POE switch or switches to provide power and data to your access points.  Not sure how many access points you are delpoying, but get a POE switch to handle the  number of access points.  We used Cisco Small Business gigabit POE managed switch, which works great.

 

I strongly recommed using VLANs on the Sonicwall and the POE switch.  If you create VLANs you setup will be easy and manageble.  As an example we created 3 VLANs and created those sub-interfaces  (50, 60, and 70) on the WLAN (X4).  50 was for Corp users, 60 for guest users, and 70 is for another function, but readily available.    On your POE switch(s) create VLANs as well.  Be sure to assign each port that will host a Sonic access point to VLANs 50 and 60 respectively.

 

I hope this helps.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) 18.1.5.5 by Razvan Serea Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) is a utility for completely removing AMD/NVIDIA/INTEL graphics drivers and related packages from your system, attempting to eliminate all leftovers (including registry entries, folders and files, driver store). Though AMD/NVIDIA/INTEL drivers can usually be removed via the Windows Control Panel, this uninstaller tool was created for situations where standard uninstall fails, or when you need to fully remove NVIDIA or ATI graphics card drivers. After using this driver cleaner, your system will behave as though it’s the first time you’re installing a new driver—similar to a fresh Windows installation. As with all such tools, we recommend creating a restore point beforehand, allowing you to undo changes if issues arise. If you're having trouble installing an older or newer driver, try it—there are reports that it resolves such problems. Recommended usage: The tool can be used in Normal mode but for absolute stability when using DDU, Safemode is always the best. Make a backup or a system restore (but it should normally be pretty safe). It is best to exclude the DDU folder completely from any security software to avoid issues. You do NOT need to uninstall the driver prior using DDU. Requirements: .NET Framework 4.8 Compatible with Windows 7, 8, 8.1, 10, and 11 (32-bit or 64-bit) Note: Using on Insider Preview builds is at your own risk. Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) 18.1.5.5 changelog: Added 'Reset to recommended' button for the Options. General fixes and improvements. Download: Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) 18.1.5.5 | 1.7 MB (Freeware) Download: DDU Portable | 1.2 MB Links: Display Driver Uninstaller Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • WACUP 1.99.51.24568 Preview by Razvan Serea WACUP (WinAmp Community Update Project) is a modern, enhanced version of the classic Winamp music player, designed for better stability, performance, and compatibility. Built for Windows, WACUP retains the familiar Winamp interface while adding 64-bit support, bug fixes, and new features like improved audio format support, customizable skins, and optimized playlist management. Unlike bloated alternatives, WACUP focuses on lightweight performance and regular updates, making it the best choice for fans of the classic Winamp experience. Basically, if you miss the good old days of Winamp and want a modern upgrade that doesn’t mess things up, WACUP is for you! WACUP key features: Classic Winamp Feel – Keeps the familiar interface and functionality. Bug Fixes & Stability – Fixes old Winamp issues and improves performance. 64-Bit Support – Works better on modern systems. More Formats & Plugins – Supports additional audio formats and third-party plugins. Customizable UI – Skins and tweaks for a personalized look. Better Library Management – Improved playlists, media organization, and search. No Bloat – Focuses on performance without unnecessary extras. Regular Updates – Community-driven development with new features and fixes. WACUP 1.99.51.24568 Preview changelog: Fixed a deadlock seen from the recent crash reports when doing some of the drag + drop actions within the media library window Fixed a loading crash seen related to a problem with some of the artwork cache image files being restored which should now be better handled allowing for the bad image to be removed without it failing Fixed a deadlock seen from the recent crash reports when the internal metadata cache clearing is triggered which could block the main ui thread for too long with this now being moved to a background thread Fixed some performance issues with some of the methods related to determining artwork support which mainly affected the local library import / refresh (this is still slower for some compared to other players because there's more data & artwork aspects being checked for which means doing more processing on a single file despite the best of attempts to reduce duplicate / heavy processing where possible) Fixed a crash with the JTFE based missing files hotkey which no one seems to have used for an age for this to appear (maybe it's time to seriously consider stripping out features that aren't being used) Fixed how some of the file types which use extra information to reference their sub-songs is handled which was preventing some from being correctly resolved back to their base file (noticed fixing above) Fixed an issue with the handling of files with underscores in their filepath which wasn't being correctly handled causing some of the filename to be lost when shown as the title if title reading is delayed Fixed a few things that might be behind NotSoDirect not being stable for some setups though am still not certain that the changes done for this are going to fully resolve the problem from the crash reports Fixed the OS toast handling when there's no prior shortcut in the OS start menu to now create the shortcut (needed to allow the yes/no buttons for the new build / post-release toast) to be done as a hidden one so it's less likely to cause annoyance for those not wanting to see it whilst still allowing this less than ideal OS api implementation requirement to be met to avoid toasts without the needed buttons Fixed a regression when moving from taglib1 to taglib2 which broke some of the handling in place to allow for external programs to still access files when wacup has a held open cached instance of the file Everything else Updated cppwinrt (gen_win10shell.dll) to 3.0.260520.1 (26 May 2026) Updated libcurl (libcurl.dll) to 8.2.1 (24 Jun 2026) Updated Monkey's Audio (in_ape.dll) to 13.15 (28 Jun 2026) Updated mpg123 (mpg123.dll) to 1.33.6 (6 Jun 2026) Updated OpenSSL (libcurl.dll) to 3.5.7 (9 Jun 2026) Updated pugixml to 1.16 (16 Jun 2026) Updated taglib (tag2.dll) to 2.3.0 (11 May 2026) Updated vgmstream (in_vgmstream.dll) to the latest Git commit from 28 Jun 2026 Download: WACUP 64-bit | 9.6 MB (Freeware) Download: WACUP 32-bit View: WACUP Website | Screenshots Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • "over a thousand engineering hours" and started selling it but could not take a couple of minuets to send an AI email to ask permission. What an expensive lesson.
    • just tested it yesterday, a simple page with autoloading ADS takes 60mb....just 1 page for 60 megabytes.   poor people with a limited internet never will visit neolose
    • Tor Browser 15.0.17 by Razvan Serea Protect your privacy. Defend yourself against network surveillance and traffic analysis. Tor is a network of virtual tunnels that allows people and groups to improve their privacy and security on the Internet. The Tor software protects you by bouncing your communications around a distributed network of relays run by volunteers all around the world: it prevents somebody from watching your Internet connection and learning what sites you visit, it prevents the sites you visit from learning your physical location, and it lets you access sites which are blocked. The Tor Browser Bundle lets you use Tor on Windows, Mac OS X, or Linux without needing to install any software. It can run off a USB flash drive, comes with a pre-configured web browser to protect your anonymity, and is self-contained. Tor Browser 15.0.17 changelog: All Platforms Updated Tor to 0.4.9.11 Updated NoScript to 13.6.25.1984 Build System / All Platforms Bug tor-browser-build#41821: Update gpg subkeys for boklm Bug tor-browser-build#41827: Update morgan's keychain with renewed key Download: Tor Browser (64-bit) | Tor Browser (32-bit) | 109.0 MB (Open Source) View: Tor Browser Website | Other Operating Systems Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      Wakeen1966 earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Apprentice
      jahara21 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      526
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      265
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      146
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      99
    5. 5
      macoman
      55
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!