Recommended Posts

"There! Mark of no-life! If that gets you, you're phouchged."

- Sykes, about Crysis 3

"Dirty screen" overlays and excessive sun glare seems to have been lifted from Frostbite, though. Or it's becoming a trend now, like water splat pixel shaders.

I noticed Black Ops 2 now has grime on the lens and a few more lens flares .

"There! Mark of no-life! If that gets you, you're phouchged."

- Sykes, about Crysis 3

"Dirty screen" overlays and excessive sun glare seems to have been lifted from Frostbite, though. Or it's becoming a trend now, like water splat pixel shaders.

At least it makes sense in Crysis 3 (because of the nanosuit's helmet). It's definitely a trend though. Frostbite 2 had it first, then CryENGINE 3 and Unreal Engine 4.

  • 3 weeks later...

Crytek confirms minimum, recommended, and high-performance system operating requirements for PC version of upcoming shooter.

The Crysis series is known for being a graphically demanding franchise, but just how powerful a rig must a gamer have to run Crysis 3 on PC? Crytek has announced the minimum, recommended, and high-performance system operating requirements for the upcoming shooter.

Crysis 3 does not support aging operating system Windows XP, with compatible options including Windows Vista, Windows 7, and Windows 8. Further, players will need at least 2GB of RAM (3GB for Windows Vista) to run the game.

The full system specifications for Crysis 3 are below. Crysis 3 launches during February 2013 for Xbox 360, PlayStation 3, and PC, but most likely not Wii U.

Minimum:

Windows Vista, Windows 7 or Windows 8

DirectX 11 graphics card with 1Gb Video RAM

Dual core CPU

2GB Memory (3GB on Vista)

Example 1 (Nvidia/Intel):

Nvidia GTS 450

Intel Core2 Duo 2.4 Ghz (E6600)

Example 2 (AMD):

AMD Radeon HD5770

AMD Athlon64 X2 2.7 Ghz (5200+)

Recommended

Windows Vista, Windows 7 or Windows 8

DirectX 11 graphics card with 1GB Video RAM

Quad core GPU

4GB Memory

Example 1 (Nvidia/Intel):

Nvidia GTX 560

Intel Core i3-530

Example 2 (AMD):

AMD Radeon HD5870

AMD Phenom II X2 565

High-performance

Windows Vista, Windows 7 or Windows 8

Latest DirectX 11 graphics card

Latest quad core CPU

8GB Memory

Example 1 (Nvidia/Intel):

NVidia GTX 680

Intel Core i7-2600k

Example 2 (AMD):

AMD Radeon HD7970

AMD Bulldozer FX4150

Far Cry 3 has raised the graphical bar, so I'm really interested to see what Crysis 3 will be like. The gameplay videos are pretty impressive but the levels look very linear and quite constrained. Oh, and I really hope it's released on Steam.

Far Cry 3 in-game:

397C0A24A7B0C78DCC990ACDFF8FF2A3CCCA7A05

9410D500235BDD4164721D2587B1D547E76E2920

I commend developers for dropping DX9 support in their games but Crysis 3 is an exception. I really wish they added DX10 support from the get-go in CryENGINE 3. If the minimum requirement is DX11, then I won't be able to play it with my good ol' Radeon HD 4870. :(

I commend developers for dropping DX9 support in their games but Crysis 3 is an exception. I really wish they added DX10 support from the get-go in CryENGINE 3. If the minimum requirement is DX11, then I won't be able to play it with my good ol' Radeon HD 4870. :(

CryEngine3 isn't DX11 only, since Crysis 2 is not even DX11 capable at all and it uses CryENGINE3.

Also I wonder if my newish Geforce GTX660 will be enough to play this at Max.

CryEngine3 isn't DX11 only, since Crysis 2 is not even DX11 capable at all and it uses CryENGINE3.

Also I wonder if my newish Geforce GTX660 will be enough to play this at Max.

CryENGINE 3 isn't DX11-only but DX9 isn't listed in the minimum requirements for Crysis 3. Also, the alpha test for Crysis 3 doesn't support DX9. I don't know when the beta will start but if it doesn't support DX9 too then it most likely won't be in the final release.

CryENGINE 3 isn't DX11-only but DX9 isn't listed in the minimum requirements for Crysis 3. Also, the alpha test for Crysis 3 doesn't support DX9. I don't know when the beta will start but if it doesn't support DX9 too then it most likely won't be in the final release.

Well ok. I'm only saying before now it wasn't DX11 only.

Crysis 3?s advanced graphics settings revealed, high-res textures at launch confirmed

Crysis-3-3-1024x576-610x289.jpg

Following reveal of Crysis 3?s system requirements over the weekend, I?ve received confirmation from EA and Crytek of which precious secondary settings we?ll be able to tweak in the game. If you remember, Crysis 2 launched with an anemic four tweakable options: v-sync, game resolution, HUD bobbing, and a general quality setting. A patch after release expanded these, and fan-made utilities helped out, but the good news is that EA and Crytek aren?t shipping Crysis 3 in the same state.

Here?s what you?ll see if you click on ?Advanced Graphics Options? in Crysis 3.

  • Game Effects
  • Object
  • Particles
  • Post Processing
  • Shading
  • Shadows
  • Water
  • Anisotropic Filtering
  • Texture Resolution
  • Motion Blur Amount
  • Lens Flares

[...]

Source: PC Gamer

It would've have been a damn shame if Crytek didn't learn from Crysis 2. I'm glad the PC version isn't being ignored at launch this time around.

CryEngine3 isn't DX11 only, since Crysis 2 is not even DX11 capable at all and it uses CryENGINE3.

say what? did you somehow miss this free patch?

http://www.mycrysis.com/dx11

Not to mention this isn't about the engine, this is about Crysis 3, which certainly looks to be DX11 only.

say what? did you somehow miss this free patch?

http://www.mycrysis.com/dx11

Not to mention this isn't about the engine, this is about Crysis 3, which certainly looks to be DX11 only.

Oh yea I forgot about that patch. Also, it was Anaron who brought up the engine bits, I was just correcting it.

If any game should have dropped DX9 support it had to be a new Crysis game. And seriously, it's long overdue, DX9 has to go already. Looks like I'll have to upgrade my HD5770 though but I was planning on doing this already.

Oh yea I forgot about that patch. Also, it was Anaron who brought up the engine bits, I was just correcting it.

I think you misunderstood me. I've known for a long time that CryENGINE 3 supports DX11 as well as DX9. When I said DX11-only, I was specifically referring to Crysis 3.

I think you misunderstood me. I've known for a long time that CryENGINE 3 supports DX11 as well as DX9. When I said DX11-only, I was specifically referring to Crysis 3.

However, only the PC can take advantage of that support - consoles cannot (yet).

The sheer breadth of PC hardware that supports DX11, though (in terms of GPUs alone) runs the gamut from the pricey to the ubiquitous.

(The floor of DX11 includes HD4000 (Intel) and HD5xxx (AMD), and those are designed into CPUs (Intel) and motherboard chipsets (AMD) respectively - hence *ubiquitous*.)

However, only the PC can take advantage of that support - consoles cannot (yet).

The sheer breadth of PC hardware that supports DX11, though (in terms of GPUs alone) runs the gamut from the pricey to the ubiquitous.

(The floor of DX11 includes HD4000 (Intel) and HD5xxx (AMD), and those are designed into CPUs (Intel) and motherboard chipsets (AMD) respectively - hence *ubiquitous*.)

I can afford to buy a new video card but I can't afford to buy a new computer. It'd be pointless to upgrade my Radeon HD 4870 when I'm still using an Intel Core2Duo E6750 and a motherboard that doesn't support DDR3 RAM.

Other games that dropped support for DX9 can run on DX10 hardware (e.g. Black Ops 2, Battlefield 3, Need for Speed: Most Wanted). According to the Steam Hardware & Software Survey, 32% of Steam users have DX10 systems. It's not as big as the 53% that have DX11 systems but it's still big enough to warrant attention. I know that Crysis 3 won't be released on Steam but the survey is a good indication of the hardware that PC gamers use.

Anyway, it's unlikely that Crytek will add DX10 support to Crysis 3 so the only real hope that's left is for them to leave DX9 support in (since CryENGINE 3 supports it).

My graphics card is already overheating, just thinking about it.

:laugh:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
    • I had a feeling this was coming. Picked up my first Mac ever last Saturday. Glad I did.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!