[Seeking help] Ports blocked for whatever the reason


Recommended Posts

Hello everyone, I know I'm new here but I could use some help and there's nowhere else I can really go, besides other forums.

My problem is that something is blocking my pc and I can't really figure what that is, because I am no expert.

I know how to port forward and I've done it before, I don't know when exactly has something changed but apparently all of my ports are suddenly blocked, and I don't know where the problem is.

I am connected to a SMC WBR14-N router, along with a laptop, and 2 more PCs. (I haven't checked yet if the ports there work but I will edit after the post). The last time I had port forward issues was when my Connection type on router was changed on PPPOE I think, now it's set as DHCP Client.

I use no antivirus program and I have recently formatted my PC, disabling firewall on my PC doesn't help either. I assume there's a problem in my router settings but since I am no expert, I prefer to ask here where the problem could be and what to fix.

Thank you for your kind help in advance.

And what does your router plug into? Quite often when users port forwarding issues is because they are behind a double nat.

http://canyouseeme.org is a good place to check if your ports are forwarded. Since doing a test from a machine on the inside is not a valid check and is a nat reflection or loopback and not all routers support that anyway.

Thank you for the reply. Yes I forgot to mention that part. My router is connected to a modem, and I am not sure what settings should modem rule in order to everything work correctly. Modem has PPPoE connection type, UPnP is enabled(as well as on router) and firewall disabled. But I wonder if the firewall is disabled on modem, router should be causing the problem or am I wrong?

Canyouseeme.org worked for me in the past but now it says I am disabled on any port I try.

"UPnP is enabled(as well as on router)"

That is not a modem, modems don't have firewalls/UPnP support - what you have there is a gateway, modem/router combo.

Look on your WBR14 for what its WAN(internet) IP is - if its 10.x.x.x, 192.168.x.x or 172.16-31.x.x then its behind a NAT (router) and for port forwarding to something behind the WBR14 you would have to forward said port to the WAN(internet) port IP on your WBR14 on your "modem"

This is a double NAT, ie a public IP changed to a private twice (double) This is not normally a setup that you would want - look to see if your modem can be setup in bridge mode. So that your WBR14 gets a PUBLIC IP on it.

Or you could just use your WBR14 as a accesspoint (wireless to your network) - this is done by turning off the dhcp server on your wbr14, and connecting it to your "modem" via a LAN port on your WBR14 -- give the WBR lan an IP on your "modems" network 192.168.?.? and then you can connect to that IP to setup the wireless.

Other option if you really want to use your WBR to control port forwarding is to put the WBR wan IP into the dmz of your "modem"

Again if it does NAT its not a MODEM.. There is a lot of confusion of terms out there with terms. Here is what they should be called.

Modem - changes media type, say cable to ethernet - pubic IP is given to device connected to it.

Router - in the home market this is a device that takes public IP on wan interface and allows multiple devices to plug into it on the lan side using private IPs and share the 1 public IP with multiple computers on private IPs

Gateway - this is combination of modem and router. Most every single ADSL, DSL device sold today is a gateway device. You only normally see true modems in the cable internet market.

These are how these terms should be used when discussing home internet connections for sure. If you tell me you have a modem, I would assume you have a router behind it or only 1 device connected to it which has a public IP on it. Quite often user is doing double nat because what they call a modem in front of their router is really a gateway ;)

If you tell me you have a router I would assume you have a device in front of it. If you tell me you have a gateway tells me you only have 1 device that converts your internet connect to a private network. Rarely have to worry about double nat.

Hope this helps.. I would suggest either putting your "modem" into bridge mode which means it really is just a modem, then your router would handle any PPPoE type logins, or put it into half bridge mode where it does the PPPoE login but puts a public IP on the device connected to it. Or just use your WBR as an access point. The double nat option is not the preferred choice - you can run into issues with things behind double nat. If all your doing is outbound browsing the internet, reading email it works not too much of an issue - but if your going to want to do port forwarding then yeah double nat can be problematic.

I have see triple nat and even quadrupedal nats out there -- because the user keeps connecting routers to add more ports or more wireless when all they really needed was switch or accesspoint, etc.

Thank you BudMan for clarification. I had before running the same setup as I have now, but controlling everything through WBR14. I am not sure when that changed but here I am now, I didn't find any setting on my SpeedTouch to put it into bridge mode, how do I archieve my previous setup again?

Lets start by telling us what model equipment you have on your network, we can then bring up instructions for you and walk you through step by step on what to do. or point you in the direction of instructions already made on how to do what you want. unfortunately every manufacturer has a different gui or different command line set to manage their equipment. For example, what I would step you through on a linksys would not be the same on a netgear, or a westell vs a 3com vs a ariens, vs a actiontec, vs etc....

What is the make and model of your "modem" And I can look for instructions for bridge mode.

But look on your WBR - what is its wan IP? 192.168.1.100?? For example - if so on your "modem" put 192.168.1.100 in DMZ, or forward the ports you need say 80 to 192.168.1.100 on "modem" Then on WBR forward 80 to the IP you want, say for example 192.168.2.100

You for sure do not want the same network on wan as lan on the WBR.. So make sure if your "modem" is handing out say 192.168.1 that you change your WBR lan network to be something like 192.168.0 or 192.168.2

That is one option, other option is to control port forwards on your "modem" and then just setup the WBR as accesspoint. This would be the option I would use if I could not put the "modem" into bridge mode.

edit: Well take that back - I would never in a million years stick with what the ISP gave me as a router. I would change out the equipment with a normal modem, or a device I could put in bridge mode. If that was not possible then I would change ISPs so that I could get a public IP on the device I want to use as my edge router. So in a sense no I wouldn't being using WBR as accesspoint. But yes if I wanted to add wireless to my network and what I had was a wireless router, then yes I would use it as an accesspoint and not a router. That is what I currently do ;)

Ok I found these, but its a bit dated I did not see the manual for the 7.4 so I would think its the same.. Is yours a WL model? either way instructions for this should be the same

post-14624-0-37726700-1346274844.jpg

So clearly it can do bridge mode -- I would suggest you call your ISP and have them walk you through putting the device in bridge mode.

That SpeedTouch has very little options and I can't put it into bridge mode manually, I just checked my ISP's forums and looks like I will have to call them. So once they put it in bridge mode, it should work like: my all PCs will be connected to a WBR from where I will be controlling everything, and WBR to SpeedTouch modem.

Yes if they put your speedtouch into bridge mode, then you can control your port forwards at your WBR, it will have a public IP on its wan. No double nat involved.

So you now have PUBLIC IP on your wbr wan interface?

if so then either your ISP is blocking the port? Many isps block such things as 80 and 25 for example. If not blocking and you have public on your router, then either your port forward is not working. Some routers don't like UPnP enabled while doing manual port forwards for example. Or you just have it forwarding to the wrong IP of the machine inside, or your inside machine is not listening on the port or has a firewall blocking the port, etc.

First step is the verify you have a public IP on the WAN. What port are you wanting to forward? is this port listening on your inside box? Simple to test with netstat -an command on that box, can you connect to your service your trying to forward through your router/firewall to from another machine on your network using the private IP of the machine?

Do you have something setup to be in the DMZ of the wbr - you can not have a dmz host and then forward a different port to different machine etc. Atleast many routers are like this.

You sure you set up the forward correctly on the WBR, and not some port triggering rule?? I see this quite often as well with users trying to setup port forwards. Also the box your forwarding to is connected to the WBR, you don't have some other nat behind your WBR do you?

My wbr ip is still the same: 192.168.2.1 to access router, DMZ is disabled. I am quite sure I forwarded ports correctly since I've done it before and I know how things should be set to work correctly, port is assigned to my local IP without any filters, and canyouseeme.org can't access it.

DUDE --- WHAT IS THE WAN IP?? If you saying its 192.168.2 then your still behind a nat, and your speedtouch is NOT in bridge mode.

post-14624-0-22211400-1346353419_thumb.j

is the IP address under your status and WAN show a 10.x.x.x or 192.168.x.x or 172.16-31.x.x then your speedtouch is NOT in bridge mode!!

Well thats a PRIVATE IP address now isnt it -- so NO your forwards are NEVER going to work.. Because the NAT device in front of it is not sending the ports to 192.168.1.64, since your WBR never sees the traffic - it kind of hard for it to forward it to your 192.168.2.x box that you want to see this traffic now isn't it!

If your ISP told you your speedtouch is in bridge mode -- they are IDIOTS!!! because clearly its NOT! Or your WBR router WAN would be a PUBLIC IP, ie NOT 192.168 or 10.x or 172.16-31

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Onkyo Dolby Atmos AV receivers are really solid deals by Sayan Sen Recently we covered great deals on several soundbar models from the likes of Sony, JBL, Samsung and others for really good prices (the lowest in several months). Aside from that we also reported on the Edifier S3000MKII, a hi-fi two-way bookshelf monitor that's available for only $800. Today we bring a list of AV receivers from Onkyo that are available at great prices including the Onkyo NR7100, RZ30, and 8470 (purchase links under the specs table down below). The Onkyo TX-NR7100 and Onkyo TX-RZ30 are both 9.2-channel AV receivers designed for immersive home theater setups but they occupy slightly different tiers within Onkyo’s lineup with the RZ30 positioned as the more advanced model. The TX-NR7100 is a THX Certified 9.2-channel receiver offering up to 100 W per channel (8 ohms, 2 channels driven). It supports Dolby Atmos, DTS:X, and IMAX Enhanced formats, with flexible configurations such as 5.1.4 or 7.1.2 speaker layouts. A key highlight is its built-in Dirac Live Room Correction which should help optimize sound based on your room and its acoustics. In comparison, both models share several core capabilities though the RZ30 is geared toward enthusiasts seeking more precise calibration and system flexibility, while the NR7100 is positioned as a slightly more accessible, value-focused option with strong all-round performance. The technical specs of the RZ30 and NR7100 9.2 AVRs are given in the table below: Specification Onkyo TX-RZ30 Onkyo TX-NR7100 Power Output (FTC, 2ch driven) ~100 W/ch (8Ω, 20Hz–20kHz, 0.08% THD) 100 W/ch (8Ω, 20Hz–20kHz, 0.08% THD) Dynamic / Peak Power 9 × 170 W (6Ω, 1kHz, 1% THD, 1ch driven) 220 W/ch (6Ω, 1kHz, 10% THD, 1ch driven) Frequency Response 5 Hz – 100 kHz (+1/-3 dB) 10 Hz – 100 kHz (+1/-3 dB) THD 0.08% 0.08% Room Correction Dirac Live (full bandwidth) Dirac Live (with AccuReflex support) Immersive Audio Dolby Atmos, DTS:X, IMAX Enhanced Dolby Atmos, DTS:X, IMAX Enhanced Speaker Layout Support Up to 7.2.2 / 5.2.4 / 9.2 processing Up to 7.2.4 / 5.2.4 / 9.2 processing HDMI Inputs / Outputs 6 inputs / 2 outputs (eARC) 6 inputs / 2 outputs (Main + Sub/Zone 2) HDMI 2.1 Support 8K/60, 4K/120, VRR, ALLM, QFT, DSC, eARC 8K/60, 4K/120, VRR, ALLM, QFT, DSC, eARC Video Formats HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HDCP 2.3 HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HDCP 2.3 Streaming / Network Wi-Fi, AirPlay 2, Chromecast, Bluetooth, DTS Play-Fi Wi-Fi, AirPlay 2, Chromecast, Bluetooth, DTS Play-Fi Get them at the links below: Onkyo TX-RZ30 9.2-Channel AV Receiver: $797.00 (Sold and shipped by Electronic Expo) Onkyo TX-NR7100 9.2-Channel AV Receiver: $699.00 (Sold and shipped by Adorma) Onkyo TX-8470 2 Ch Stereo Receiver: $449.00 (Sold and Shipped by Adorma) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links or authorized dealer links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from such links only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • A different thing with Russia. When you say is it better, depends on things. It is better that we don't have the E.U making rules and laws that have nothing to do with them. Is the trading part better? No, that is really mucked up, but then we knew that was going to happen and we would have make agreements, like we do with other parts of the world. Freedom of movement is certainly better, but could be improved, we still need more control over our borders. do you live in the U.K?
    • So what am I quoting from them? I never listened to what Farage or his cronies said. I wanted the U.K to leave the E.u years before the referendum and it had nothing to do with Farage and his cronies. So what country do you live in? Did we work much better together? We were always at logger heads with the E.U because we disagreed with them so much. Maggie was always on at them. I would have thought the E.U was glad to get rid of us as we stopped the integration or made it a two tier. Now without us they can integrate more. I would not have voted out if it was just a trading block and we can still work together on somethings.
    • MPC-BE 1.9.0 by Razvan Serea Media Player Classic - BE is a free and open source audio and video player for Windows. Media Player Classic - BE is based on the original "Media Player Classic" project (Gabest) and "Media Player Classic Home Cinema" project (Casimir666), contains additional features and bug fixes. The BE mod (Black Edition Mod) is a skinned version of Media Player Classic Home Cinema, much better looking than the plain old MPC. MPC-BE 1.9.0 changelog: Splitters Fixed crashes in some situations. AudioSplitter Added support for the RF64 format. Fixed reading of channel layout for some WavPack files. Added support for ID3 tags for Wave64 files. Unknown Wave64 chunks are now ignored. AviSplitter Added support for 'y408' video. Improved support for 'HEVC' video. FLVSplitter Added support for VVC video. MP4Splitter Improved handling of corrupted files. MatroskaSplitter Expanded support for V_UNCOMPRESSED video codecs. Fixed support for frame rotation (ProjectionPoseRoll). Improved support for "V_MS/VFW/FOURCC / HEVC". MpcDvdVideoDecoder Fixed conversion to YUY2. Fixed display of menus for some DVD-Videos. RoQVideoDecoder Output in NV12 and YV12 formats is allowed. Full range is used. MPC Video Decoder RGB32 format will be output as a top-down bitmap by default. Added support for the "IID_MediaSideDataDOVIMetadataV2" interface. Removed support for the deprecated "IID_MediaSideDataDOVIMetadata" interface. Fixed retrieving the name of the video adapter when using NVDEC. Fixed crashes in some situations. MPC Video Converter Added support for AYUV video format. MpcAudioRenderer Improved input format validation. Optimized retrieval of supported formats for exclusive mode. Added the "Keep audio device active when paused" setting. Fixed crashes and freezes in various situations. Subtitles Added the ability to open the properties of an external subtitle renderer in the "Subtitles" settings panel. Fixed external subtitle connections for VSFilter. Fixed a crash when rendering PGS/SUP subtitles when using AVX2. YouTube Improved support for yt-dlp. The built-in YouTube parser is no longer used. Player The HTTP read strategy has been changed. If the playlist contains one entry, more key combinations can be used to control the player (jump through chapters, adjust volume). Improved support for reading ASX playlists. The translation of the MediaInfo report for Chinese, Korean and Japanese has been removed. Added blocking of 32-bit filter "PICVideo Lossless JPEG Decompressor" (pvljpg20.dll), because it crashes. Added blocking of the system filter "AVI Decompressor", which will eliminate the crash of VFW codecs. Fixed a rare crash when using the "/slave" key. Fixed a crash when getting a list of fonts for OSD. Added the ability to load an external audio file using hotkeys. Fixed opening a network path starting with \?\UNC. The "Determine duration when adding" playlist setting now works for YouTube video URLs. The "Online media services" settings panel has been redesigned. Added a "Merge files using FFmpeg" option to the file saving dialog. This option is activated when playing multiple streams obtained using yt-dlp. Added loading of local .dpl playlists ("DAUMPLAYLIST"). Fixed a hang when the user closes the player during the URL opening process. Various interface fixes. Installer Updated MPC Video Renderer 0.10.5. Updated MPC Script Source 0.2.17. Added MPC Image Source 0.3.6. Translations Updated Japanese translation (by tsubasanouta). Updated Chinese (Traditional) and Dutch translation (by beter). Updated Romanian translation (by Andrei Miloiu). Updated Hungarian translation (by mickey). Updated Turkish translation (by cmhrky). Updated German translation (by Klaus1189). Updated Chinese (Simplified) translation (by wushantao). Updated Italian translation (by mapi68). Updated Korean translation (by Hackjjang). Updated Chinese (Traditional) (by udfbe). Updated libraries dav1d 1.5.3-6-g04b69f9; ffmpeg n8.2-dev-1857-g4653e68aab; libpng git-v1.6.55-9-g7d52a8087; Little-CMS git-lcms2.18-26-gf739cda; MediaInfo git-v26.05-38-g702c9b7fd; ZenLib git-v0.4.41-91-g073f297; zlib 1.3.2. Download: MPC-BE 64-bit | Portable MPC-BE 64-bit | ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Download: MPC-BE 32-bit | Portable MPC-BE 32-bit Link: Media Player Classic - BE Home Page Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Apple reportedly looks to blacklisted Chinese memory chips as RAM prices climb by Karthik Mudaliar Image via Apple Apple is reportedly trying to get a clearance from the Trump administration to buy memory from ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT) to get some relief from soaring DRAM prices. As per a report by the Financial Times, Apple approached the Commerce Department more than a month ago and also spoke to other officials and allies in Washington. For starters, CXMT is a company that's already been placed on the Pentagon's list of Chinese military companies. The Chinese company is the country's top DRAM maker. For Apple, the timing is certainly awkward but not surprising. Tim Cook had recently warned that Apple would have to raise prices because AI companies are buying up large amounts of memory for data centers, and just like that, Apple raised MacBook and iPad prices. Micron also recently revealed that customers have committed billions of dollars to secure memory supply years in advance, which shows us how aggressive securing infrastructure has become. This gives suppliers such as Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron more leverage, while pushing hardware makers to look for alternatives. CXMT is one of those alternatives, but not the simplest one. Apple has spent many years trying to diversify parts of its supply chain away from China, especially for final assembly, while still depending heavily on Chinese manufacturing and suppliers. Even domestic brands from China are moving towards CXMT and YMTC instead of relying on Samsung, Micron, and SK Hynix. For Apple, though, it would invite more scrutiny than local Chinese companies. For now, this is more like a lobbying effort rather than a confirmed supply deal. There's no official statement from either of the parties. What is clearer, though, is the pressure behind such a request. AI demand has certainly made hardware a bottleneck, and companies are trying everything they can to bring things back to normal, even if that means making politically sensitive choices. Source: Financial Times
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      227
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!