[Seeking help] Ports blocked for whatever the reason


Recommended Posts

Hello everyone, I know I'm new here but I could use some help and there's nowhere else I can really go, besides other forums.

My problem is that something is blocking my pc and I can't really figure what that is, because I am no expert.

I know how to port forward and I've done it before, I don't know when exactly has something changed but apparently all of my ports are suddenly blocked, and I don't know where the problem is.

I am connected to a SMC WBR14-N router, along with a laptop, and 2 more PCs. (I haven't checked yet if the ports there work but I will edit after the post). The last time I had port forward issues was when my Connection type on router was changed on PPPOE I think, now it's set as DHCP Client.

I use no antivirus program and I have recently formatted my PC, disabling firewall on my PC doesn't help either. I assume there's a problem in my router settings but since I am no expert, I prefer to ask here where the problem could be and what to fix.

Thank you for your kind help in advance.

And what does your router plug into? Quite often when users port forwarding issues is because they are behind a double nat.

http://canyouseeme.org is a good place to check if your ports are forwarded. Since doing a test from a machine on the inside is not a valid check and is a nat reflection or loopback and not all routers support that anyway.

Thank you for the reply. Yes I forgot to mention that part. My router is connected to a modem, and I am not sure what settings should modem rule in order to everything work correctly. Modem has PPPoE connection type, UPnP is enabled(as well as on router) and firewall disabled. But I wonder if the firewall is disabled on modem, router should be causing the problem or am I wrong?

Canyouseeme.org worked for me in the past but now it says I am disabled on any port I try.

"UPnP is enabled(as well as on router)"

That is not a modem, modems don't have firewalls/UPnP support - what you have there is a gateway, modem/router combo.

Look on your WBR14 for what its WAN(internet) IP is - if its 10.x.x.x, 192.168.x.x or 172.16-31.x.x then its behind a NAT (router) and for port forwarding to something behind the WBR14 you would have to forward said port to the WAN(internet) port IP on your WBR14 on your "modem"

This is a double NAT, ie a public IP changed to a private twice (double) This is not normally a setup that you would want - look to see if your modem can be setup in bridge mode. So that your WBR14 gets a PUBLIC IP on it.

Or you could just use your WBR14 as a accesspoint (wireless to your network) - this is done by turning off the dhcp server on your wbr14, and connecting it to your "modem" via a LAN port on your WBR14 -- give the WBR lan an IP on your "modems" network 192.168.?.? and then you can connect to that IP to setup the wireless.

Other option if you really want to use your WBR to control port forwarding is to put the WBR wan IP into the dmz of your "modem"

Again if it does NAT its not a MODEM.. There is a lot of confusion of terms out there with terms. Here is what they should be called.

Modem - changes media type, say cable to ethernet - pubic IP is given to device connected to it.

Router - in the home market this is a device that takes public IP on wan interface and allows multiple devices to plug into it on the lan side using private IPs and share the 1 public IP with multiple computers on private IPs

Gateway - this is combination of modem and router. Most every single ADSL, DSL device sold today is a gateway device. You only normally see true modems in the cable internet market.

These are how these terms should be used when discussing home internet connections for sure. If you tell me you have a modem, I would assume you have a router behind it or only 1 device connected to it which has a public IP on it. Quite often user is doing double nat because what they call a modem in front of their router is really a gateway ;)

If you tell me you have a router I would assume you have a device in front of it. If you tell me you have a gateway tells me you only have 1 device that converts your internet connect to a private network. Rarely have to worry about double nat.

Hope this helps.. I would suggest either putting your "modem" into bridge mode which means it really is just a modem, then your router would handle any PPPoE type logins, or put it into half bridge mode where it does the PPPoE login but puts a public IP on the device connected to it. Or just use your WBR as an access point. The double nat option is not the preferred choice - you can run into issues with things behind double nat. If all your doing is outbound browsing the internet, reading email it works not too much of an issue - but if your going to want to do port forwarding then yeah double nat can be problematic.

I have see triple nat and even quadrupedal nats out there -- because the user keeps connecting routers to add more ports or more wireless when all they really needed was switch or accesspoint, etc.

Thank you BudMan for clarification. I had before running the same setup as I have now, but controlling everything through WBR14. I am not sure when that changed but here I am now, I didn't find any setting on my SpeedTouch to put it into bridge mode, how do I archieve my previous setup again?

Lets start by telling us what model equipment you have on your network, we can then bring up instructions for you and walk you through step by step on what to do. or point you in the direction of instructions already made on how to do what you want. unfortunately every manufacturer has a different gui or different command line set to manage their equipment. For example, what I would step you through on a linksys would not be the same on a netgear, or a westell vs a 3com vs a ariens, vs a actiontec, vs etc....

What is the make and model of your "modem" And I can look for instructions for bridge mode.

But look on your WBR - what is its wan IP? 192.168.1.100?? For example - if so on your "modem" put 192.168.1.100 in DMZ, or forward the ports you need say 80 to 192.168.1.100 on "modem" Then on WBR forward 80 to the IP you want, say for example 192.168.2.100

You for sure do not want the same network on wan as lan on the WBR.. So make sure if your "modem" is handing out say 192.168.1 that you change your WBR lan network to be something like 192.168.0 or 192.168.2

That is one option, other option is to control port forwards on your "modem" and then just setup the WBR as accesspoint. This would be the option I would use if I could not put the "modem" into bridge mode.

edit: Well take that back - I would never in a million years stick with what the ISP gave me as a router. I would change out the equipment with a normal modem, or a device I could put in bridge mode. If that was not possible then I would change ISPs so that I could get a public IP on the device I want to use as my edge router. So in a sense no I wouldn't being using WBR as accesspoint. But yes if I wanted to add wireless to my network and what I had was a wireless router, then yes I would use it as an accesspoint and not a router. That is what I currently do ;)

Ok I found these, but its a bit dated I did not see the manual for the 7.4 so I would think its the same.. Is yours a WL model? either way instructions for this should be the same

post-14624-0-37726700-1346274844.jpg

So clearly it can do bridge mode -- I would suggest you call your ISP and have them walk you through putting the device in bridge mode.

That SpeedTouch has very little options and I can't put it into bridge mode manually, I just checked my ISP's forums and looks like I will have to call them. So once they put it in bridge mode, it should work like: my all PCs will be connected to a WBR from where I will be controlling everything, and WBR to SpeedTouch modem.

Yes if they put your speedtouch into bridge mode, then you can control your port forwards at your WBR, it will have a public IP on its wan. No double nat involved.

So you now have PUBLIC IP on your wbr wan interface?

if so then either your ISP is blocking the port? Many isps block such things as 80 and 25 for example. If not blocking and you have public on your router, then either your port forward is not working. Some routers don't like UPnP enabled while doing manual port forwards for example. Or you just have it forwarding to the wrong IP of the machine inside, or your inside machine is not listening on the port or has a firewall blocking the port, etc.

First step is the verify you have a public IP on the WAN. What port are you wanting to forward? is this port listening on your inside box? Simple to test with netstat -an command on that box, can you connect to your service your trying to forward through your router/firewall to from another machine on your network using the private IP of the machine?

Do you have something setup to be in the DMZ of the wbr - you can not have a dmz host and then forward a different port to different machine etc. Atleast many routers are like this.

You sure you set up the forward correctly on the WBR, and not some port triggering rule?? I see this quite often as well with users trying to setup port forwards. Also the box your forwarding to is connected to the WBR, you don't have some other nat behind your WBR do you?

My wbr ip is still the same: 192.168.2.1 to access router, DMZ is disabled. I am quite sure I forwarded ports correctly since I've done it before and I know how things should be set to work correctly, port is assigned to my local IP without any filters, and canyouseeme.org can't access it.

DUDE --- WHAT IS THE WAN IP?? If you saying its 192.168.2 then your still behind a nat, and your speedtouch is NOT in bridge mode.

post-14624-0-22211400-1346353419_thumb.j

is the IP address under your status and WAN show a 10.x.x.x or 192.168.x.x or 172.16-31.x.x then your speedtouch is NOT in bridge mode!!

Well thats a PRIVATE IP address now isnt it -- so NO your forwards are NEVER going to work.. Because the NAT device in front of it is not sending the ports to 192.168.1.64, since your WBR never sees the traffic - it kind of hard for it to forward it to your 192.168.2.x box that you want to see this traffic now isn't it!

If your ISP told you your speedtouch is in bridge mode -- they are IDIOTS!!! because clearly its NOT! Or your WBR router WAN would be a PUBLIC IP, ie NOT 192.168 or 10.x or 172.16-31

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!