Windows 8 firewall and Windows Store


Recommended Posts

Hello, I decided to ask here because I searched everywhere and nobody mentions this issue. I 've been playing around with Windows 8 and according to my Windows 7 habits I disabled various Windows services including Windows Firewall, Defender etc because I use third party applications for those purposes. I soon discovered though that disabling the Windows Firewall service prevents you from installing and using any Windows Store Apps, giving out errors like "Something happened and the app failed to install" accompanied by an error code. Re-enabling the Windows Firewall service brings everything back to normal. So it seems Microsoft decided to force its own firewall on Windows users? Does anybody know of a workaround that will allow me to to disable the Windows Firewall Service and still be able to download and install apps from the Windows Store?

I have comodo installed. If I enable the Windows Firewall Service the Windows Store works fine, even with comodo installed so I dont think comodo is to blame. I'll uninstall comodo though and see what happens. If it doesnt work I'll enable the firewall service and disable it from control panel and see what happens then.

I have comodo installed. If I enable the Windows Firewall Service the Windows Store works fine, even with comodo installed so I dont think comodo is to blame. I'll uninstall comodo though and see what happens. If it doesnt work I'll enable the firewall service and disable it from control panel and see what happens then.

Try searching for "turn off firewall" and click on "check firewall status". then in the lefthand bar click "turn windows firewall on/off" and turn it off from there, instead of just stopping the service.

Yea, this is a known problem many other users have encountered. I don't know any way around it, except temporarily starting the service when you need to install/update something from the Store. It's fracking idiotic, yes.

Its got to be the applications themselves rather than ports. I use a network firewall and eset endpoint security with the windows firewall service disabled & an implicit deny firewall rule so it doesn't use any non standard ports.

The only thing i can think of is you have dcom or rpc disabled

I don't have any firewall service running (really, there's no point--virtually zero benefit aside from some placebo feel-good security theater--in having a software firewall or a router firewall running, esp. if you're behind a NAT). So if an alternate firewall works, then the Store is checking for a firewall. Whatever the case, requiring that one exists is, again, absolutely idiotic.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This got me thinking, would you rather a self driving car prioritise protecting its passengers or everyone else? I'd choose the one that keeps me and my kids safest. At some point, these cars have to make those choices already, don't they? Wonder if we have a way to find out what way they lean.
    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      565
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!