Welcome Guest! To access all forums & features, please register an account or sign-in. → Why register?



'Looper'-like time travel may be possible


34 replies to this topic - - - - -

#31 I am Reid

    Neowinian Wise One

  • 4,399 posts
  • Joined: 03-November 05
  • Location: Columbus, Ohio

Posted 02 October 2012 - 06:20

View PostSolid Knight, on 01 October 2012 - 19:40, said:

Isn't time just motion relative to other motion? If nothing ever moved, would time exist?

well that would include light not moving either, so yea


#32 Ambroos

    Neowinian UNSTOPPABLE

  • 5,332 posts
  • Joined: 16-January 06
  • Location: Belgium

Posted 02 October 2012 - 06:57

I don't believe travelling backwards will ever be possible. But travelling into the future shouldn't be too hard, even without all the fancy speed thing. There will be a point when we'll just be able to 'suspend' humans similar to how we freeze embryo's. Simply put yourself in a fancy time travel freezer, set the suspend timer to X years and hope you get out in the time you want. Should be a lot easier than building something that reaches the speed of light.

#33 F_C

    Neowinian²

  • 130 posts
  • Joined: 15-October 09

Posted 02 October 2012 - 07:13

Quote

more nonsense and unfounded speculation...

I have not seen the movie "Looper" so I can't comment on that in particular, but Time D
ilation itself is not "nonsense and unfounded speculation".

It's just that the differences we see at the moment in modern transport are so negligible we generally dismiss it. Hop on a plane around the world right now and you would have "travelled" about a nanosecond more compared to the rest of us who didn't get on that plane. That is to say, if you think the plane flight took exactly 24 hours, people on the ground who did not travel would say the flight took 24 hours + 1 ns.

I think all the article is trying to point out is that one day when we can travel a lot faster than we can now then it may be that you can travel for an hour and it appears to everyone else you've been gone 2 hours, which would be of benefit to some.

(read about the Hafele–Keating experiment if you are interested in the plane experiment, also see what they do to GPS satellites to counter the effect)

#34 XerXis

    Neowinian Wise One

  • 4,743 posts
  • Joined: 13-February 06
  • Location: Belgium

Posted 02 October 2012 - 07:21

View PostWalrush, on 01 October 2012 - 02:24, said:

People who genuinely think Time Travel is possible probably also believe in Unicorns.

how come, if you are in a moving object time is going slower for you. So you are essentially in a time machine that brings you to the future. Things outside of your moving object will age faster. That is not a theory.

(Of course, at the velocities we move it almost doesn't make a difference)

#35 DarkyDan

    Neowinian²

  • 141 posts
  • Joined: 13-January 09

Posted 02 October 2012 - 07:57

I've always found the idea of travel into the future VERY plausible (speed of travel being the only hurdle to overcome)... but travelling into the past to be ludicrous.

Travelling to the past would only be possible if Time was "physical" and flowed both ways. It only goes forward, I think. I haven't researched the matter :p