Welcome Guest! To access all forums & features, please register an account or sign-in. → Why register?



Amazing Spider-Man 2


119 replies to this topic - - - - -

#16 +Brando212

    Causer of disasters

  • 5,463 posts
  • Joined: 15-April 10
  • Location: right behind you
  • OS: OSX ML, Windows 7/8 Pro

Posted 01 November 2012 - 20:18

View PostRazorwing, on 29 September 2012 - 19:15, said:

I still hate the Lizard design.
I'll agree with you there, but aside from that everything else was pretty great


#17 shakey

    It's soooooo Educational

  • 10,904 posts
  • Joined: 31-March 04
  • Location: Austin, Tx

Posted 01 November 2012 - 20:24

View PostBrando212, on 01 November 2012 - 20:18, said:

I'll agree with you there, but aside from that everything else was pretty great

I hated it at first, but after watching it, I liked it. It was a good blend between the 2, and didn't look stupid, but just creepy.

#18 episode

    Neowinian Fanatic

  • 6,038 posts
  • Joined: 11-December 01

Posted 02 November 2012 - 00:36

View Posttheyarecomingforyou, on 29 September 2012 - 20:17, said:

A reboot was completely unnecessary and the trailer for The Amazing Spider-Man was so bad (it was one of the worst movie trailers I have ever seen) that I skipped it, despite being a fan of the previous films. I honestly don't understand the logic of redoing an origin story so soon after the original but clearly there's enough money in it.

They have to release one every 3 years or they lose the license.

#19 OP Rappy

    Mudblood

  • 98,651 posts
  • Joined: 20-July 02
  • Location: England
  • OS: Windows 7 Enterprise
  • Phone: Blackberry Bold 9900

Posted 12 November 2012 - 20:50





#20 jakem1

    Neowinian UNSTOPPABLE

  • 5,447 posts
  • Joined: 17-November 06

Posted 12 November 2012 - 20:56

View Posttheyarecomingforyou, on 29 September 2012 - 20:17, said:

A reboot was completely unnecessary and the trailer for The Amazing Spider-Man was so bad (it was one of the worst movie trailers I have ever seen) that I skipped it, despite being a fan of the previous films. I honestly don't understand the logic of redoing an origin story so soon after the original but clearly there's enough money in it.

Agreed. I watched it on the weekend and didn't think much of it. I had high hopes because I really like Andrew Garfield but the story was just dull and the girl in it was the the least convincing 17 year old I've ever seen (is it really that hard to find a 17 year old actor in America???). The whole storyline felt rushed, kind of pointless and very unoriginal.

I'd like to say that a sequel could only be better but I don't hold out much hope.

#21 M_Lyons10

    Neowinian ULTRAKILL

  • 12,315 posts
  • Joined: 21-October 08
  • Location: Pennsylvania

Posted 12 November 2012 - 21:11

I'm kind of disappointed. I neither liked the story, the directing, OR the lead actor... lol

I had been hoping for another reboot (Though I now that would be unlikely...). lol

#22 OP Rappy

    Mudblood

  • 98,651 posts
  • Joined: 20-July 02
  • Location: England
  • OS: Windows 7 Enterprise
  • Phone: Blackberry Bold 9900

Posted 15 November 2012 - 02:18

CHRONICLE'S Dane Dehaan Up For Harry Osborn Role In THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN Sequel

Quote

In an article just published over at THR, the site reveal some names testing for a various supporting roles in some upcoming movies. But the one that stands out is that of Harry Osborn, the character previously played by James Franco in Sam Raimi's trilogy. THR report that the role was originally to be filled by a "bigger athletic actor", but has now been reconfigured and someone a little more "dark and edgy" is being sought after.They reckon Brady Corbet (Melancholia), Dane Dehaan (Chronicle) and Alden Ehrenreich (the upcoming Beautiful Creatures) are the lads that are vying for the role, but that more names may enter the mix as the "character is evolving".


#23 OP Rappy

    Mudblood

  • 98,651 posts
  • Joined: 20-July 02
  • Location: England
  • OS: Windows 7 Enterprise
  • Phone: Blackberry Bold 9900

Posted 03 December 2012 - 19:59



#24 Routerbad

    Neowinian Libertarian

  • 852 posts
  • Joined: 18-April 06
  • Location: Oceanside, CA
  • OS: W8
  • Phone: WP7.5

Posted 03 December 2012 - 20:12

I enjoyed the new film much more than any of the previous ones. Too touchy feely and skipped over way too much to keep to the trilogy format. I hope that the new series is a long runner, with sequels every few years rather than 3 and done. It would allow much more character development in the long term with much more action in the short term. Maybe a 3-4 movie contract for each of the central characters.

#25 OP Rappy

    Mudblood

  • 98,651 posts
  • Joined: 20-July 02
  • Location: England
  • OS: Windows 7 Enterprise
  • Phone: Blackberry Bold 9900

Posted 04 December 2012 - 02:19

Quote

In addition to today's earlier announcement that Chronicle actor Dane DeHaan officially signed on for the sequel's ‘Harry Osborn,’ director Marc Webb also announced that Academy Award-winning actor Jamie Foxx will definitely play ‘Electro,’ the super-villain of The Amazing Spider-Man 2. And speaking with Entertainment Tonight just hours after Sony's press release, Foxx explained:

“Electro is a great character! I met with the director, Mark Webb, I met with Andrew Garfield, and we talked,” the Django Unchained actor continued. “I think Electro will be an exciting character to play because he's a … genius electrician-type person, and he gets the short end of the stick from the whole world, and the next thing you know he turns it on.”

http://www.comicbook...n/news/?a=70831

#26 Razorwing

    藤原 拓海

  • 13,803 posts
  • Joined: 14-March 03
  • Location: Markham,Ontario
  • OS: Windows 8 / OSX Mountain Lion
  • Phone: HTC One

Posted 04 December 2012 - 02:49

hmmm Foxx as Electro? not sure about that.

#27 GP007

    Neowinian ULTRAKILL

  • 13,645 posts
  • Joined: 04-February 07
  • Location: Greece
  • OS: Windows 8 Pro 64bit
  • Phone: HTC Windows Phone 8X

Posted 04 December 2012 - 10:15

OK, maybe it's just because I don't know the amazing spiderman comic series that well but isn't it too soon to introduce MJ again? As far as I know in the original comic line she doesn't show up till a good deal later on.

#28 Anaron

  • 20,361 posts
  • Joined: 25-May 04
  • Location: Toronto, ON
  • OS: Windows 8
  • Phone: HTC 8S

Posted 05 December 2012 - 08:32

Dane DaHaan is a great choice for Harry Osborne. I was just telling my sister the other day that he's somewhat of an underrated actor. I first saw him in Chronicle and once again in Lawless. I can't wait to see him in the sequel to The Amazing Spider-Man.

As for Jamie Foxx, I'm not surprised. I wouldn't be surprised if he went bald to better resemble the Ultimate Electro.

#29 OP Rappy

    Mudblood

  • 98,651 posts
  • Joined: 20-July 02
  • Location: England
  • OS: Windows 7 Enterprise
  • Phone: Blackberry Bold 9900

Posted 28 January 2013 - 20:37

Paul Giamatti Up For Rhino Role in The Amazing Spider-Man 2

Quote

It looks like Marc Webb's upcoming sequel to The Amazing Spider-Man will be getting another new villain! The Hollywood Reporter says that Paul Giamatti is in talks to play the Rhino in the May 2, 2014 film. It's also being reported that Felicity Jones is in talks for an undisclosed role.

The alter-ego of Aleksei Mikhailovich Sytsevich, the Rhino first appeared in 1966's "The Amazing Spider-Man" #41. A former low-key thug, an experiment grafted a nearly-indestructible polymer to Aleksei's skin, making him nearly unstoppable.

Giamatti appeared last in year in a variety of projects like Rock of Ages, Cosmopolis and John Dies at the End. Jones, meanwhile, is well known for roles in films like The Tempest and Like Crazy.

Already set to star Andrew Garfield, Emma Stone, Jamie Foxx, Shailene Woodley, Dane DeHaan and Martin Sheen, the new chapter in the Spider-Man saga was already confirmed to see the debut of Electro (Foxx) and Mary Jane Watson (Woodley).

(http://www.comingsoo...ws.php?id=99447)

#30 OP Rappy

    Mudblood

  • 98,651 posts
  • Joined: 20-July 02
  • Location: England
  • OS: Windows 7 Enterprise
  • Phone: Blackberry Bold 9900

Posted 06 February 2013 - 02:21

Official Sypnosis

Quote

Columbia Pictures announced today that filming has begun on The Amazing Spider-Man™ 2 in New York. The film is the first in the history of the franchise that will be filmed entirely in New York City and New York State.

The sequel to last year’s critical and box office hit The Amazing Spider-Man, the film stars Andrew Garfield, Emma Stone, Jamie Foxx, Shailene Woodley, Dane DeHaan, Colm Feore, Paul Giamatti, and Sally Field.

In The Amazing Spider-Man™ 2, for Peter Parker (Andrew Garfield), life is busy – between taking out the bad guys as Spider-Man and spending time with the person he loves, Gwen (Emma Stone), high school graduation can’t come quickly enough. Peter hasn’t forgotten about the promise he made to Gwen’s father to protect her by staying away – but that’s a promise he just can’t keep. Things will change for Peter when a new villain, Electro (Jamie Foxx), emerges, an old friend, Harry Osborn (Dane DeHaan), returns, and Peter uncovers new clues about his past.

The film is directed by Marc Webb from a screenplay by Alex Kurtzman & Roberto Orci & Jeff Pinkner, with a previous draft by James Vanderbilt, and based on the Marvel Comic Book by Stan Lee and Steve Ditko. Avi Arad and Matt Tolmach are the producers.

The film’s key behind-the-scenes team includes director of photography Dan Mindel, production designer Mark Friedberg, editors Pietro Scalia and Elliot Graham, and costume designer Deborah L. Scott.

The latest chapter in the Spider-Man story is set for release in 3D on May 2, 2014.