Welcome Guest! To access all forums & features, please register an account or sign-in. → Why register?



Scientists Propose Asteroid Dust Shield to Combat Global Warming


44 replies to this topic - - - - -

#1 Hum

    totally wAcKed

  • 54,436 posts
  • Joined: 05-October 03
  • Location: Odder Space
  • OS: Windows XP, 7

Posted 01 October 2012 - 19:27

A a group of scientists in Scotland are publishing a paper in the journal Advances in Space Research that contemplates using asteroid dust to shield the Earth from solar radiation, thus mitigating the effects of global warming.

The idea has some problems, however.

The plan, according to Space.com, would be to capture an asteroid -- 1036 Ganymed, for preference -- and use a mass driver to throw out material from it to move it to the L1 point, the Earth Moon Lagrange Point that lay directly between the Earth and moon. Then the same mass driver would create a stream of asteroid dust that would surround the Earth and block out enough solar radiation to cancel out the effects of global warming, giving the world enough time to switch from a carbon based energy economy to something else.

According to JPL, 1036 Ganymed is the largest known Earth-approaching asteroid, with a diameter of about 32 kilometers. It is an S type asteroid, meaning that it is composed of metallic iron mixed with iron- and magnesium-silicates. Space.com states that the asteroid has a mass of 130 million-billion kg. Using it as a source of a dust shield would create a cloud of 5 million-billion kilograms stretching about 2,600 kilometers wide.

According to Space.com, the scientists behind the proposal concede that politically moving such an enormous mass close to Earth would be difficult at best. An accident or a miscalculation could cause 1036 Ganymed to hit the Earth, which would end human civilization :| and likely a considerable amount of the biosphere.

more


#2 shockz

    Neowinian Super Cool

  • 19,369 posts
  • Joined: 09-November 01
  • Location: USA
  • OS: Windows 8
  • Phone: iPhone 5

Posted 01 October 2012 - 19:29

View PostHum, on 01 October 2012 - 19:27, said:


According to Space.com, the scientists behind the proposal concede that politically moving such an enormous mass close to Earth would be difficult at best. An accident or a miscalculation could cause 1036 Ganymed to hit the Earth, which would end human civilization :| and likely a considerable amount of the biosphere.
more

I think I'll take global warming over that..

#3 theyarecomingforyou

    Tiger Trainer

  • 11,452 posts
  • Joined: 07-August 03
  • Location: Falmouth, UK Profession: Jaded Sceptic Abilities: Telepathy
  • OS: Windows 8

Posted 01 October 2012 - 19:33

View PostHum, on 01 October 2012 - 19:27, said:

According to Space.com, the scientists behind the proposal concede that politically moving such an enormous mass close to Earth would be difficult at best. An accident or a miscalculation could cause 1036 Ganymed to hit the Earth, which would end human civilization :| and likely a considerable amount of the biosphere.

So it's a win-win?

#4 Solid Knight

    Neowinian UNSTOPPABLE

  • 5,092 posts
  • Joined: 22-February 08
  • Location: New Orleans, LA

Posted 01 October 2012 - 19:36

The easiest way to end global warming is to build a super big A/C that vents into space.

#5 rippleman

    Neowinian Senior

  • 2,349 posts
  • Joined: 17-June 09
  • Location: Near Calgary, Alberta
  • OS: Windows 7
  • Phone: Upgraded back to 2 year old iPhone 4 from new Galaxy 2Sx

Posted 01 October 2012 - 19:38

global warming is a temporary condition It happens from time to time just like the Ice ages. Once you have this "dust" shield, you would then also have to remove it (or clean it up) once the earth started to cool again. The earth has looked after itself for 4 billion years, i figure it can handle this global warming thing on its own. We, on the other hand, will just have to hang in there and enjoy the ride nature takes us on. This one sadly is beyond our control for now.

#6 TPreston

    Neowinian Senior

  • 1,704 posts
  • Joined: 18-July 12
  • Location: Ireland
  • OS: Windows Embedded Standard 8 & Server 2012/08 Datacenter
  • Phone: Nokia Lumia 920

Posted 01 October 2012 - 19:42

View Postrippleman, on 01 October 2012 - 19:38, said:

global warming is a temporary condition It happens from time to time just like the Ice ages. Once you have this "dust" shield, you would then also have to remove it (or clean it up) once the earth started to cool again. The earth has looked after itself for 4 billion years, i figure it can handle this global warming thing on its own. We, on the other hand, will just have to hang in there and enjoy the ride nature takes us on. This one sadly is beyond our control for now.

Im no rocket scientist but i think there might be a tiny chance that pumping 26 gigatonnes of CO2 per year into earths atmosphere might have an effect on our climate :/

#7 tiagosilva29

    If you're in trouble PM me

  • 11,890 posts
  • Joined: 08-May 04

Posted 01 October 2012 - 19:45

Posted Image

We should set up an electromagnetic shield.

#8 Detection

    Detecting stuff...

  • 8,369 posts
  • Joined: 30-October 10
  • Location: UK
  • OS: 7 SP1 x64

Posted 01 October 2012 - 19:50

Posted Image

http://meninblack.wi...i/ArcNet_Shield

#9 +sanke1

    Member

  • 2,039 posts
  • Joined: 07-October 07

Posted 01 October 2012 - 20:03

This is trolling at finest. Instead start compulsarily implementing green eco friendly technologies in vehicles NOW. The technologies are there. Just there is no political will.

#10 +Phouchg

    Blackheart

  • 3,775 posts
  • Joined: 28-March 11
  • Location: Krikkit
  • OS: GrumpyOS 6.1.7601 x64

Posted 01 October 2012 - 20:04

View PostHum, on 01 October 2012 - 19:27, said:

An accident or a miscalculation could cause 1036 Ganymed to hit the Earth, which would end human civilization :| and likely a considerable amount of the biosphere.
Or Batarian terrorists...

#11 +Crisp

    To Infinity and Beyond!

  • 3,649 posts
  • Joined: 06-May 10
  • Location: 127.0.0.1

Posted 01 October 2012 - 20:06

I'm just up for migrating to Mars...

or URanus lulz.

#12 rippleman

    Neowinian Senior

  • 2,349 posts
  • Joined: 17-June 09
  • Location: Near Calgary, Alberta
  • OS: Windows 7
  • Phone: Upgraded back to 2 year old iPhone 4 from new Galaxy 2Sx

Posted 01 October 2012 - 20:06

View PostTPreston, on 01 October 2012 - 19:42, said:

Im no rocket scientist but i think there might be a tiny chance that pumping 26 gigatonnes of CO2 per year into earths atmosphere might have an effect on our climate :/
nature does that more in a single event... the volcano that erupted in the phillipines put more CO2 in the atmosphere in one single event that humans have done in their ENTIRE existence. Humans causing global warming is like saying ants are killing the US transportation infrastructure.

#13 TPreston

    Neowinian Senior

  • 1,704 posts
  • Joined: 18-July 12
  • Location: Ireland
  • OS: Windows Embedded Standard 8 & Server 2012/08 Datacenter
  • Phone: Nokia Lumia 920

Posted 01 October 2012 - 20:08

View Postrippleman, on 01 October 2012 - 20:06, said:

nature does that more in a single event... the volcano that erupted in the phillipines put more CO2 in the atmosphere in one single event that humans have done in their ENTIRE existence. Humans causing global warming is like saying ants are killing the US transportation infrastructure.

[citation needed] but i fully expect you to come through with this and overturn the current state of climate science :rolleyes:

[insert humerus comparison to creationists carbon dating claims]

#14 XerXis

    Neowinian Wise One

  • 4,743 posts
  • Joined: 13-February 06
  • Location: Belgium

Posted 01 October 2012 - 20:12

View Postrippleman, on 01 October 2012 - 20:06, said:

nature does that more in a single event... the volcano that erupted in the phillipines put more CO2 in the atmosphere in one single event that humans have done in their ENTIRE existence. Humans causing global warming is like saying ants are killing the US transportation infrastructure.

http://news.discover...ate-110627.html

Quote

Despite statements made by climate change deniers, volcanoes release a tiny fraction of the amount of carbon dioxide emitted by human activities every year.
In fact, humans release roughly 135 times more carbon dioxide annually than volcanoes do, on average, according a new analysis. Put another way, humans emit in under three days the amount that volcanoes typically release in a year, according to the best estimates of volcanic emissions.

Don't believe everything you hear unless they/you can back it up with numbers

#15 The Laughing Man

    Neowinian Wise One

  • 2,933 posts
  • Joined: 18-May 03
  • Location: Kyoto, Japan

Posted 01 October 2012 - 20:13

I hope the asteroid they pick doesn't contain the black cancer.