• 0

Question

Hi,

I have an html form that i would like external customers will be able to fill up and send it back to us.

<form action="[email protected]"?subject="email subject" method="submit">

For some reason in windows 7 64 bit, with outlook 2010 and explorer 9, mailto action doesn't work for me.

An empty outlook message is displayed and only the subject and recipients are added.

There is no attachment and no body text.

When I changed the default browser to FF i received the text i wanted in the body section instead as an attachment (postdata.att).

I can't use server code cause the html form is sent by outlook to external customers, so asp/php/cgi is irelevant for me.

Does anyone has a solution?

Thanks,

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1109569-mailto-problem-with-explorer-9/
Share on other sites

13 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Mailto works with a <a href="mailto:[email protected]">link</a> and makes the user able to open a email program and send a mail to [email protected] thsi does not however work like a email form.

To make a email form I suggest to use code like php,

you can easily copy paste code from here ;): http://www.freeconta.../email_form.php

  • 0

Unfortunately as I mentioned, I really can't use a server side code, so PHP is also not an option.

What about CDO? Can I use it as a solution?

I read somewhere that microsoft doesn't support this technology with outlook 2010.

Is there some sort of a replacement for the CDO protocol?

  • 0

you say

I can't use server code cause the html form is sent by outlook to external customers,

Is it the fact you cant use server side code or don't know how to insert text into outlook message from php?

You can send mail directly from php using your own mail server to external clients

  • 0

Hi,

i do know how to use a server side code. i have no problem with the part where I send the form the external customers.

My problem is when the customers submit the form they receive. At the moment I'm usiing the mailto action which works perfectly fine with IE8, but in IE9 returns a blank email with outlook 2010.

I have no control nor access to the web server of the client therefore I was looking for a solution which doesn't involve a server side script.

The database is located in my organization's server, I only need the customers to fill up some info via the form and to automatically update the data in my database.

Till now it worked great...

  • 0

You have no access to the server but can update the mailto link? Sorry that does not make any sense.

Also i will add that any site that deals with customers/clients should have a fully working contact form rather than a link that opens an email client its more professional and easier for the users as not everyone uses outlook like you seem to be suggesting. I suggest you contact whoever this is and get them to sort out a contact form the problem would be fixed and it make them look more professional rather than cheap and lazy.

  • Like 1
  • 0

Thank you very much for your answer.

I need to explain my self better. The form is not part of a site.

My organization uses a VB software that has VB forms. One of the software's functions is to export a VB form into an HTML form and send it automatically through Outlook to external customers.

Since we work with Microsoft technology, and all our customers are organizations which use outlook and exchange server, it is the only thing we need to support.

The mailto action is generated automaticlly by the VB code and since the code was developed in house, we can change it if needed.

However, I can't change the external customers' server code! the only interaction with them is through the outlook mail.

When they submit the form, we get an email notification, we are requested to approve the data and only then the database is updated.

The problem occurs only when they submit the form and not when we send it to them.

I really need to find a better solution for this.

I understand that there lots of problems with the mailto action, and that it depends on the type of browser and mailbox I'm using. In my case, I already know that I need to make it work with outlook 2010 and IE9.

What could be the problem?

  • 0

The problem with mailto is simple... it's internet explorer itself, as always :p

And if it's microsoft server you could use asp instead of php , never heard of a web server unable to run anything besides html :/

And only using the mailto option isn't going to be working since the fault is not the webpage but webbrowser, this might be fixed in IE10 on windows 8, I can test it if you want.

  • 0

Ok im confused and looking at this wrong what im getting is:

We create a form in VB its converted to HTML we send that to our customers

They then fill it in and send back, we then update our records after a notification

What i dont get is why your making it all complecated and you still dont use a form "Because we can not change there server code!" who says you have to change there's? Create the form like you normally would and then add the asp/php and upload to your serverserver and then email them the link to the form which they can fill in and then there is no issues. The db with their answer/answers can be in a separate db or even joint to the main one so that only 1 click rather will update x clients instead of 10 clicks being 10 clients or i could be set to do it every xminutes/hours.

Anyway i'll let Seahorse take over, some borderlands then bed i think besides im not a huge coder it just interests me.

  • 0

as Xoligy says

set up the html form on your webserver

send the clients a link

they click the link fill in the form and submit it

thats takes all responsibility on submitting stuff etc from them to your form

its the simplest and easiest way to do it

  • 0

Xoligy, you are right that I can use server side code with my form and then upload it to our local web server, the only problem is that our customers are external customers. They have no access to our intranet web server, therefore, it does not matter if I send them a link to the form, they won't be able to open it.

It's a good solution to use a public internet server to host the forms, th problem here is the cost and maintenance that I'm sure we have the budget for it.

  • 0

Cost is an issue in all businesses, and i guess it depends on how big your business is, how many forms you plan on running at the same time and if you see the solution saving time which is money and in this case i feel it would as for cost host + domain i say about ?20-50 a year should cover you, then you just need a page marker or a fully working website and sort out how your links are going to work with the forms.

Look at it this way, once you have a site, forms and a database there is no need to check emails and update records which im guessing is what someone spends alot of time doing over and over again its wasted time imo.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • This is why science is the only path to truth. It isn't rigid in its beliefs, rather it changes its views based on scientific discoveries.
    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      164
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      92
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!