Apple explains purple flare issue affecting camera on iPhone 5 and other ph


Recommended Posts

So people should have a thicker phone so other people can take pictures of DIRECT SUNLIGHT?

Brilliant! :laugh:

Nope, but Apple shouldnt sacrifice quality over a 1mm thickness decrease.

And it isnt direct sunlight. And depending on the pic, the sun makes the picture...again, it wasnt direct sunlight. But again, they made the phone thinner and in turn screws with a key feature/selling point of their device.

So people should have a thicker phone so other people can take pictures of DIRECT SUNLIGHT?

Brilliant! :laugh:

It happens when the sun and other light sources aren't even in the image.. So yes, other phones can take pictures while the sun shines on the side of the phone.

  • Like 2

You are just talking rubbish. You go learn the physics of lenses. Lenses are lenses, and they may create flares no matter their size, focal point, coating, material composition, price point or whatever. If you still fail to understand this, well I am surely not going to explain that to you any further.

Yes, iBub, lenses are lenses. So where are the Hubble shots?

Nope, but Apple shouldnt sacrifice quality over a 1mm thickness decrease.

And it isnt direct sunlight. And depending on the pic, the sun makes the picture...again, it wasnt direct sunlight. But again, they made the phone thinner and in turn screws with a key feature/selling point of their device.

Let me put it to you a different way, anyone who knows what causes this knows how to fix it, iPhone or otherwise. Anyone who doesn't, probably doesn't care much about photography anyway, so it's hardly a "key feature".

This is like arguing that when reflected light hits your eyes it's bright, and that's a failure on whoever designed your eyes.

Let me put it to you a different way, anyone who knows what causes this knows how to fix it, iPhone or otherwise. Anyone who doesn't, probably doesn't care much about photography anyway, so it's hardly a "key feature".

This is like arguing that when reflected light hits your eyes it's bright, and that's a failure on whoever designed your eyes.

So it's no big deal when a phone is affected by flaring and hazing at mich wider angles than EVERY other phone, and when you get flares, they get bigger with a bigger hazing area that's far more pronounced and when you don't have flaring but you have the sun hiting on the phone from the side, you get hazing all across the side of the image. something again, no other phone shows.

Yes the flaring happens on everything, and the hazing with sun hitting the phone while not being in the picture happens on old phones with bad scratchy plastic lenses. but the flaring and hazing isn't even remotely as bad or easy to get on other phones.

Yes it's avoidable. BUT it's a phone, it's a instant point and shoot camera. it's not a DSLR. it's not there for you to compose great shoots. it's there to take goods pictures of what's happening around you. without you needing to worry about composting or having to stand this way while tilting over sideways and holding your hand at an awkward angle to shade the sun, and moving the phone a little more to not have the hand in the picture and sacrificing two virgins while burning black devil candles on a pentagram while.... oh ooops. the kids stopped doing that funny thing you where going to take a picture of about 5 minutes ago.

To bad you had an iphone so instead of taking a photo right away, maybe with a small flare up int he corner, your picture is instead half covered in a flare, and the other half is badly tinted purple and you can't see what's going on. But hey, this flaring and hazing is no big deal and won't affect anyone...

  • Like 2

Yes it's avoidable. BUT it's a phone, it's a instant point and shoot camera. it's not a DSLR. it's not there for you to compose great shoots.

You're half right, here, in that most people will take unremarkable photos with their phone, in which case the flare is an issue, in that it will add more purple haze to an already bad picture.

You're wrong saying it's not there to compose great shots. Good photographers can take good pictures with anything, and they would have already been aware of this issue.

So, ****ty pictures got shittier. Or, iPhone 5 pics got pre-instagrammed. Whatever.

You're half right, here, in that most people will take unremarkable photos with their phone, in which case the flare is an issue, in that it will add more purple haze to an already bad picture. You're wrong saying it's not there to compose great shots. Good photographers can take good pictures with anything, and they would have already been aware of this issue. So, ****ty pictures got shittier. Or, iPhone 5 pics got pre-instagrammed. Whatever.

By your logic, you're saying every snapshot not taken by a professional photographer is ****ty.

I'd say, potentially good or even great pictures turn ****ty.

By your logic, you're saying every snapshot not taken by a professional photographer is ****ty.

I'd say, potentially good or even great pictures turn ****ty.

Nope. Every photograph that doesn't account for lighting is ****ty.

bulls...

regular people take great photographs all the time. without needing to know about lighting techniques. sometimes it's not about the light but about what happens, and outdoor pics in the daytime have somewhat different requirements for lighting anyway.

The point is a great pic of your kids playing, or your dog or anything taken on a P&S or a decent camera phone, could on the iPhone5 euther have a big flare in the corner, or have purple hazing across half the picture.

regular people take great photographs all the time. without needing to know about lighting techniques. sometimes it's not about the light but about what happens, and outdoor pics in the daytime have somewhat different requirements for lighting anyway.

The point is a great pic of your kids playing, or your dog or anything taken on a P&S or a decent camera phone, could on the iPhone5 euther have a big flare in the corner, or have purple hazing across half the picture.

People take photographs all the time. Great photographs, with absolutely no consideration for technique? That's gotta be pretty rare... and I don't think a bit of lens flare is going to really cut down on the number of those.

People take photographs all the time. Great photographs, with absolutely no consideration for technique? That's gotta be pretty rare... and I don't think a bit of lens flare is going to really cut down on the number of those.

A photograph of, say, my boss faceplanting could be a great photo, and it could be absolutely ruined by a huge flare.

It's not like I could ask him to faceplant again to take another shoot.

A photograph of, say, my boss faceplanting could be a great photo, and it could be absolutely ruined by a huge flare.

It's not like I could ask him to faceplant again to take another shoot.

don't bother,he's into the photography elitism, and only pro photographers who follows the rules of 3's and parallels and pairs and symmetry can take good photos.

Apparently people can't take good photos of their kids on the trampoline, riding their first bike, your dog in the first snow and all that. their all **** unless you're a pro photographer, who first set up the tripod and a lighting rig and then train the dog in exactly what he's going to do in the snow so you get him to do the exact right thing in the exact right place for the lighting and all to be perfect.

or you know, maybe he hasn'theard of action photography.

don't bother,he's into the photography elitism, and only pro photographers who follows the rules of 3's and parallels and pairs and symmetry can take good photos.

Apparently people can't take good photos of their kids on the trampoline, riding their first bike, your dog in the first snow and all that. their all **** unless you're a pro photographer, who first set up the tripod and a lighting rig and then train the dog in exactly what he's going to do in the snow so you get him to do the exact right thing in the exact right place for the lighting and all to be perfect.

or you know, maybe he hasn'theard of action photography.

Again, you can take these photos, and this flare issue will not affect them AT ALL.

Unless you can find me some "great" or even decent photos ruined by purple haze, you're just spouting nonsense.

Again, you can take these photos, and this flare issue will not affect them AT ALL.

Unless you can find me some "great" or even decent photos ruined by purple haze, you're just spouting nonsense.

So when a mother takes a great picture of her kids on the trampoline. and half the picture is covered by purple hazing because the sun shone on the phone from the side, that is what you call "not affected at all" ?

Let me put it to you a different way, anyone who knows what causes this knows how to fix it, iPhone or otherwise. Anyone who doesn't, probably doesn't care much about photography anyway, so it's hardly a "key feature".

This is like arguing that when reflected light hits your eyes it's bright, and that's a failure on whoever designed your eyes.

Actually human eyes are designed quite poorly, there are giant squid with far superior and similar eye design. This however would be pretty useless to us humans as the light reception would be too bright.

There are also other animals with superior eye design

Not sure what this has to do with a camera lens though

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Well, it's good to know that they have found a workaround to a problem that they helped create, I guess...
    • Meta is reusing old DDR4 RAM in its servers instead of buying new hardware by Ivan Jenic Image: Meta The global hardware shortage isn’t exactly news, as the entire world has been struggling with rising component prices for quite some time now. And while big companies certainly aren’t as affected as the average consumer, even they aren’t opposed to the idea of saving a few (million) bucks. Meta appears to have found a way to spend less on new hardware while also putting its outdated infrastructure to use, essentially killing two birds with one stone. The company has built a custom chip that lets it reuse memory from retired servers rather than buying new hardware. The chip is called Vistara and allows for connecting old DDR4 RAM from obsolete servers into new servers that rely on DDR5. The problem Vistara solves goes back to a basic mismatch in how long hardware lasts. Meta replaces its servers every three to five years, but the memory modules inside them are good for seven to ten. When a server gets decommissioned, perfectly usable DDR4 RAM goes with it. Meta is presenting the new method at today’s ISCA symposium, but The Register has got hold of a paper that explains how Vistara works. It's a custom ASIC that bridges DDR4 memory to newer processors via aCXL 2.0/1.1 interface over PCIe Gen5 x16. Meta pulls DDR4 sticks from old machines and installs them in dedicated units it calls MemServers, each of which pairs 768GB of DDR5 with 256GB of recovered DDR4. The operating system sees the DDR4 as an additional memory node and draws from it when the primary DDR5 is running low. Off-the-shelf CXL hardware couldn't do this, so Meta built its own. Existing interfaces bundle their own memory with the controller, which makes reusing old RAM sticks impossible. But Vistara separates the controller from the memory entirely, so Meta can plug in whatever DDR4 sticks it has on hand. Meta plans to deploy the new architecture in hyperscale infrastructure with millions of servers, which should mean that Meta’s AI datacenters will now be more efficient. The company is investing heavily in AI infrastructure, especially with its new AI model, Muse Spark, now widely available. All of this doesn't mean that Meta will exclusively rely on "recycled" RAM, but the company is still looking at considerable savings at scale.
    • Save up to 87% on ChatPlayground AI lifetime subscriptions by Steven Parker Today's highlighted deal comes via our Apps + Software section of the Neowin Deals store, where for only a limited time, you can save up to 87% on ChatPlayground AI: lifetime subscriptions. ChatPlayground AI puts the world’s top AI models in one powerful interface, letting you enter a single prompt and instantly compare outputs from multiple models to choose the perfect response for your needs. Boost productivity and creativity with access to the latest AI giants like GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet 4, Gemini 1.5 Flash, DeepSeek V3, and dozens more — all in one window. Whether you’re chatting, coding, generating images, or refining prompts, ChatPlayground AI equips you with advanced tools like prompt engineering, image/PDF chat, saved conversations, and AI image creation, plus priority support to keep your workflow seamless. Access the world’s best AI models Side-by-Side Comparisons: Enter one prompt & instantly view results from multiple AI models to find the best output for your needs 40+ AI Models: Includes GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet 4, Gemini 1.5 Flash, DeepSeek V3, Llama, Perplexity, and many more Multi-Function Platform: Access AI for chat, image generation & coding all within a single interface Web Browser Extension: Offers a Chrome extension to seamlessly integrate the platform into your browsing workflow Boost productivity with powerful features ChatPlayground Interface: Designed for seamless AI model comparison in one window Prompt Engineering: Refine & optimize your prompts for better, more accurate responses Chat with Images & PDFs: Upload visuals and documents to get context-aware answers Saved Chat History: Keep track of past conversations for reference & ongoing projects AI Image Generation: Create high-quality visuals powered by top AI image models Priority Customer Support: Get faster assistance whenever you need it What you'll get with the Unlimited Plan Includes unlimited messages/month Built for prompt engineers, startups, and teams who run experiments nonstop Includes priority access to new features and future models Good to know Length of access: lifetime Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Access options: Desktop Max number of device(s): Unlimited Available to both NEW & Existing users Updates included A lifetime subscription to ChatPlayground AI (Unlimited Plan) normally costs $619, but you can pick it up for just $79 for a limited time - that represents a saving of $530 (87% off). Click the link below for more details, always check terms and specifications before making a purchase. Get this ChatPlayground AI (Unlimited) for $79 (was $619) There are also two other discounted plans to choose from. Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. Why we post these deals We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. So for those that keep moaning and complaining, be thankful we're still online for you to even do that. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
    • I like Tidal, but it still does not control devices from the mobile/app and still no surround support. And yeah re: above comment I still get a lot of network errors and I am on a 4/4 Gbit Fiber connection.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      539
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!