Requiring another SATA connection


Recommended Posts

I'm no PC buff, so this will be obvious to some, but not me.

I have the [Asus M4A88TD-V EVO/USB3 880G] motherboard as i bought from ebuyer in 2010.

I see the connectors for SATA 1-3, 5-6 (i.e. not 4). I'm in need of another one.

I have a graphics card installed into one of the slots - which is the 4th slot 'up' on the motherboard - a blue slot.

Under this i have 2 blue slots & 1 white slot which is different to the blue slots - i'm not sure what they're called.

Is there some sort of adapter i can buy which has more SATA connectors on it? If so what am i looking for (& which slot would i be looking to fit it in?).

I've read that this motherboard can be "unlocked to release it's potential". How would i do that & is it risky business?

clear.gif

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1115081-requiring-another-sata-connection/
Share on other sites

that board only has 5 SATA connectors

light blue are regular PCI slots smaller blue is a 4x PCI express slot

dark blue is a 16x PCI express slot, white is a 4x PCI express slot apparently if you do SLI/Crossfire

you could buy a SATA 6Gbit PCI Express card and put into any of htose PCI express slots

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16815287017

that's just the first cheaper one i saw on the list

Not sure if this might work?

http://www.amazon.co.uk/ADVANCE-PCI-card-PCI-ST101-Controller/dp/B002UD3ARK

Sounds like if you need to add more SATA Ports, then something like this would do the trick.

Shot of the motherboard: http://benchmarkreviews.com/images/reviews/motherboards/M4A88TD-V/ASUS_M4A88TD-V_EVO_USB3_Motherboard_Internal_IO_End_A01.jpg

My graphics card must be covering a slot as i can only see 1 above & 1 below the white slot.

Just to clarify - they look light blue to me, so the one above & below the white slot is a "regular PCI slot" correct? & not a PCI express slot?

Although they do look smaller than the rest, so maybe they are PCI express slots?

Shot of the motherboard: http://benchmarkrevi..._IO_End_A01.jpg

My graphics card must be covering a slot as i can only see 1 above & 1 below the white slot.

Just to clarify - they look light blue to me, so the one above & below the white slot is a "regular PCI slot" correct? & not a PCI express slot?

Although they do look smaller than the rest, so maybe they are PCI express slots?

here's your slots in order from top to bottom

1x PCI-Express - DARK BLUE

16X PCI-Express - DARK BLUE

PCI - LIGHT BLUE

PCI - LIGHT BLUE

(16x if single card nothing in top 16x slot, 4x PCI-Express if card in the top 16x slot) - WHITE

PCI - LIGHT BLUE

if you have any pci express slots open, you can put a 1x card it even if the slot is londer then the card's plug in part pci express is all backwards compatable 16x can do 1x or 8x or 4x... etc

just don't try to put a pci express card into an older PCI slot

For a cheap, quick and dirty solution you could just run a eSata to sata cable from the back of your motherboard into your case. http://www.ebay.ca/itm/SATA-Serial-ATA-eSATA-External-Shielded-Cable-20-/280488033144?pt=US_Drive_Cables_dapters&hash=item414e63bb78

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hello, Were you using a product or service from one of the companies affected by the Klue data breach?  See https://klue.com/blog/an-update-on-recent-klue-security-incident for the company's public statement.  That blog post does not list affected customer. From looking around at reports, I created this list: Gong HackerOne Huntress Insurity Jamf LastPass OneTrust Recorded Future ReliaQuest Salesforce Snyk Sprout Social Tanium It is likely there are other companies affected as well. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky  
    • SpaceX reportedly plans a Starlink mobile service for U.S. consumers by Karthik Mudaliar SpaceX reportedly wants to sell mobile phone plans directly to consumers in the United States as part of a wider expansion of Starlink. According to a report from the Financial Times, SpaceX president Gwynne Shotwell discussed the plan with investors during the company’s recent IPO roadshow. The company is also said to be considering building a terrestrial mobile network to complement Starlink’s satellite coverage. The plan is quite different from how Starlink currently operates in the U.S. mobile market. SpaceX already provides satellite connectivity for T-Mobile’s T-Satellite service, but T-Mobile remains responsible for the subscription, billing, and customer support. A Starlink-branded mobile service would give SpaceX control of the customer relationship instead. It could also turn the company from a partner of traditional mobile operators into a direct competitor. T-Mobile also began testing its Starlink-powered satellite service in early 2025. The beta was initially limited to text messaging and was also available to some AT&T and Verizon customers. The service has since expanded to support limited data access through selected apps, including WhatsApp, Google Maps, AccuWeather, and AllTrails. It is designed to provide a connection in areas where normal cell towers are unavailable, rather than replace a conventional mobile network. However, if SpaceX actually has a plan to serve nationwide, it needs to do more than just satellite networks and actually support on-ground operations. It can also partner up with existing carriers and become a mobile virtual network operator (MVNO). With that said, SpaceX has already spent heavily to support its mobile ambitions. Just last year, the company agreed to acquire wireless spectrum licences from EchoStar in deals worth a combined $19.6 billion. EchoStar's spectrum includes AWS-4, H-Block, and AWS-3 frequencies that could be used for both satellite and terrestrial communications. According to a SpaceX securities filing, the Federal Communications Commission approved the transaction in May 2026, although it is not expected to close until late 2027. There's no official statement by SpaceX for now. Pricing, availability, and other details remain unknown. Source: Financial Times
    • We had no idea as kids how much time and energy it took to be an adult 😅
    • The Trump administration doesn't want you to use OpenAI's GPT-5.6 without its approval by David Uzondu Image via @realDonalTrump (X) As OpenAI prepares the release of its next model, GPT 5.6, the White House has instructed the company to limit the distribution of the software to a small group of government-approved partners instead of the general public, as it has done with previous releases. According to The Information, OpenAI Chief Executive Officer Sam Altman sent an internal memo to staff on Thursday explaining that the federal government will approve access "customer by customer" during an initial preview phase. Altman noted in the communication that this restrictive rollout is "not [their] long-term model" for software deployment, and the company plans to work toward a "more sustainable" distribution method later. CNN said that both OpenAI and the Trump administration view the capabilities of GPT 5.6 on the same level as Anthropic's Mythos and that government officials intend to "collaborate with frontier AI labs to develop shared approaches for addressing the challenges of scaling this technology." The latest restriction comes just weeks after the US Commerce Department decided to restrict Fable, a version of Mythos with extra safety "guardrails" to prevent users from exploiting software vulnerabilities. Not long after the release, though, researchers at Amazon found a way to bypass these restrictions, prompting an aggressive response from federal authorities. The government ordered Anthropic to cut off access for non-US citizens located outside the US, non-US citizens living inside the US, and incredibly, even Anthropic's own foreign-born employees. Anthropic now appears to be building a workaround to resolve this compliance block with an update to its Privacy Policy that introduces a category called "Verification Data" to handle KYC and Digital IDs. This setup could mandate digital identity checks to filter users by nationality, requiring a government-issued ID and facial biometric data. Who knows? Maybe in the future, you would have to scan your US Passport or State ID to prove your citizenship before you are allowed to chat with Fable 5 (or any other model).
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      xvvxcvv earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      xvvxcvv earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Enthusiast
      Xonos went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      400
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      127
    4. 4
      neufuse
      69
    5. 5
      Xenon
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!