Jump to content
|Topic||Stats||Last action by|
|Xbox Games with Gold for the month of December revealed||
|What are you listening to? (2014 Edition)||
|Coca Cola unveils milk that is more ‘nutritious’ and expensive than regular milk||
|Changing spacing between taskbar icons||
|Cleveland crowd protests over 12-year-old shot by police||
Posted 28 October 2012 - 15:45
Posted 28 October 2012 - 16:04
Posted 28 October 2012 - 16:31
btw, I thought you where getting a 3200 or 5100 ?
Posted 28 October 2012 - 16:48
Posted 28 October 2012 - 17:07
Well there's a reason the 3200 is more, for one thing it has a better sensor that is capable of taking photos at higher ISO with less noise, which I think you can see would have been good for you. Personally I would have suggested you go for the 5100 then that was lower than the 3200 but a FAR better camera than the 3100.
If you still have open return on it, I suggest you consider it.
Posted 29 October 2012 - 16:37
Posted 29 October 2012 - 21:50
Posted 30 October 2012 - 21:28
Yes to both.
Is the ISO setting also set to AUTO? Do you have the "VR" setting on your lens enabled?
Posted 30 October 2012 - 22:04