Jump to content
|Topic||Stats||Last action by|
|Anyone buying a PS TV when it becomes available in their region?||
|Neowin's Minecraft Server||
|Samsung gives up on Windows laptops and Chromebooks in Europe||
|VLC for WinRT; WP version delayed. No ARM C compiler?||
|Third boob woman: 'I had a third breast implant so I can turn off men'||
Posted 28 October 2012 - 15:45
Posted 28 October 2012 - 16:04
Posted 28 October 2012 - 16:31
btw, I thought you where getting a 3200 or 5100 ?
Posted 28 October 2012 - 16:48
Posted 28 October 2012 - 17:07
Well there's a reason the 3200 is more, for one thing it has a better sensor that is capable of taking photos at higher ISO with less noise, which I think you can see would have been good for you. Personally I would have suggested you go for the 5100 then that was lower than the 3200 but a FAR better camera than the 3100.
If you still have open return on it, I suggest you consider it.
Posted 29 October 2012 - 16:37
Posted 29 October 2012 - 21:50
Posted 30 October 2012 - 21:28
Yes to both.
Is the ISO setting also set to AUTO? Do you have the "VR" setting on your lens enabled?
Posted 30 October 2012 - 22:04