Wait 20 Minutes and Try Again or How I Almost Got Fired...


Recommended Posts

This is a copy / paste from Reddit, i thought it was a good read!

Sometimes fellow techs that makes you want to smash your keyboard. (all names have been changed to protect the incompetent).

I used to work in a Service-Desk/Triage capacity (lovingly dubbed Tier 1.9) where we would monitor, ticket, troubleshoot, and escalate as needed (we were expected to have a 90% self-solution return).

One thing that we never were allowed to touch was network issues. Our area telcom team had lost their extremely competent team lead some 18 months earlier and their team had quickly degraded to people who didn't really seem to care about their job. They were also secure in the fact that the telcom system had degraded enough to be sufficiently obfuscated enough where it would take considerable resources to figure it out by a competent replacement. This made them act like they were untouchable. As such, I had learned fast to start recording my phone calls to them (thank you Google Voice!) so they couldn't pin anything on us.

Anyway, one day around 6PM the network dropped out. As such, I called the Telcom On-Call.

Me Leaving Voicemail: Hi, this is Craysh from Tier 1.9. It looks like the network is having issues again. Internet, communicator, and email are all unresponsive. All three webfarms are unavailable. Trace route to the gateway has failed. Ticket is unavailable as the ticketing system is inaccessable due to the issue. Please call back to confirm your taking ownership of the incident.

15 minutes go by and SOP dictates that I call back before escalating to their manager. The on-call answers.

Tech: On-Call Phone, this is Steve

Me: Hi Steve, have you gotten my voicemail? We're having issues with the network.

Tech: No, I haven't. Tell me what's wrong.

Me: Repeats what I said above.

Tech: Ok. Wait 20 minutes and try again. Click

I had assumed that by 'Wait 20 minutes' he meant that he was taking a look at it and that it should be back up in 20 minutes. 20 minutes go by and the network is still having issues (The network has now been down for the last 40 minutes or so)

I call the On-Call phone again. No answer.

Me Leaving Voicemail: Hi, this is Craysh again. The issue is still ongoing. Please call me back as soon as possible.

15 Minutes go by so it's time to call again. No answer. Time to call the acting supervisor.

Supervisor: This is Aaron

Me: Hi Aaron, this is Craysh from Tier 1.9. We are having issues with the network and the On-Call has stopped answering their phone.

Supervisor: Stopped? You mean they initially answered?

Me: Yes, he said to wait 20 minutes.

Supervisor: OK, he's probably working on it. Call me back in an hour if the issue persists. click

At this point I'm calling my supervisor and apprising him of the situation.

For the next hour, I continue to call the On-Call every 15 minutes (as is procedure). No answer.

I call the supervisor again

Supervisor: This is Aaron

Me: Hi Aaron, this is Craysh from Tier 1.9 again. We are still having issues with the network and the On-Call still has not answered his phone.

Supervisor: OK, I'll take a look at it.

Turns out that Telcom had pushed a policy to the Junipers that had scrubbed the white lists (completely blocking all access to all ports).

All in all it took 5 hours to get everything back up and running. I documented the ticket extremely thoroughly once the system was available again.

The next day came the fall-out. Telcom was claiming that I had never paged them, and they said that a customer ended calling the supervisor to find out what was going on. They even showed zero calls on their cellphone (they had removed the calls and messages).

As such, we had a meeting to 'discuss Tier 1.9's failure to report a severe incident'.

I walked into the room filled with extremely ****ed off big wigs, including Aaron and and Steve. They demanded why I hadn't contacted the on-call, and I stated that I had and that they had lead me to believe that they had been working on the issue.

Nobody believed me because "The On-Call phone didn't have any messages or call logs from Tier 1.9" Their excuse for having a completely empty call log was that they cleared it daily so they could keep track of the calls made on the phone.

I calmly walked to the overhead projector, logged into Google Voice, and played each consecutive voicemail/conversation.

They no longer work here, and I've had three promotions since.

Edited by John S.
properly tagged
  • Like 1

Good stuff.

I was once on the phone to Vodafone on behalf of my girlfriends mother whose contract had finished but she was still getting charged.

I recorded everything they said as i knew it was going to be a pain in the arse.

I was completely right and a dozen phone calls later no one at the company admitted to any call logs of previous correspondence between myself and Vodafone.

After playing back part of my conversation to the Indian chap on the phone, i was forwarded to another Indian chap and then another one and eventually ending up with a well spoken English chap who solved all my issues, closed the account, paid back all money owed and compensated us to the tune of ?150 for wasted time.

Sad fact is i had to go through all that for a simple account closure. There is no accountability any more.

Wow. Awesome story with a good ending. Incompetent people should realize that eventually their foolishness will catch up and bite them in the butt. Good to hear you've been promoted since then too! It sounds like management know when they've got someone who can do good work.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Yes, it was amusing at the time because even then dbrand was well known for stealing the designs of products from other companies. That’s what they do.
    • Didn’t Dbrand once complain that Casetify was ripping off their designs a well? seems pretty bad of them to try and get around Valve’s copyright this way with that in mind.
    • Dbrand thought they could get away with this Steam Machine case, Valve disagreed by David Uzondu Image via Dbrand Dbrand has cancelled its highly anticipated Companion Cube enclosure for the Valve Steam Machine, which it teased back in November of last year with a concept render and sign-up page, because it did not ask Valve for permission first before manufacturing the case. According to Dbrand, it took the "backwards approach" of building the product first before asking for permission from the copyright holder. Seven months of work went into the project, requiring over a thousand engineering hours from the design team. Workers developed forty-four sets of injection molding tools, making a unique mold for each sub-component of the crate. When the Companion Cube went live on Monday last week, it, according to Dbrand, quickly became the second-fastest-selling product in the company's fifteen-year history, racking up orders for hundreds of thousands of units. Customers eagerly bought the $129.95 deluxe edition or the bare-bones $99.95 version, which the manufacturer cheekily branded as the "Poverty Cube". It was around this time that the legal eagles at Valve descended on the accessory maker with a formal demand. The developer pointed out that the iconic block design remains protected intellectual property from the game Portal, so unlicensed sales had to stop. Dbrand said that all its pleas to salvage the project with the Valve team, including proposals to run a properly licensed release under official terms "with their blessing", fell on deaf ears, so it had no choice but to obey and remove every trace of the product from the internet. If you bought the enclosure, the company said that banks will process your refund by the end of this week, but if it still hasn't arrived in your account by then, you should not hesitate to contact support. The Steam Machine itself is a high-performance console that Valve designed directly to bring PC gaming into the living room. It was announced on 12th November 2025 (the same day Dbrand announced the Cube) and runs on the Linux-based SteamOS, the same OS that powers the Steam Deck. As for the price, due to the shortage of memory and storage chips, the hardware cost landed much higher than people were expecting, starting at $1,049 for the 512 model (without a controller) or $1,128 with the new gamepad. The premium 2 TB model pushes those prices even higher, selling at $1,349 for the standalone console and hitting $1,428 if you want the bundle.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Apprentice
      jahara21 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      534
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      97
    5. 5
      macoman
      57
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!