Recommended Posts

I ask because when I sign in using an account I give as a 'spam this email' with an inheritly rubbish password I am greeted with a page displaying;

"Your password is too easy to guess

Your current password is on a list of passwords that hackers frequently try to use. Create a new one to help keep your account secure."

So either it's stored unencrypted, or reverse-encrypted or it's a one-way hash and they've got a list of hashes that are easy to guess?

Anyone know which it is?

If I were to guess, I'd say it was a list of hashes, or list of plaintext passwords scrubbed from obvious attacks. I doubt Microsoft would store Hotmail passwords in plaintext or reversable encryption. If they did I'd expect to see "this is your password" emails instead of "reset your password" emails.

There are specific passwords that are simple to guess...that make an easy to decrypt hash. They are warning you on the basis of that fact.

Even if it's an account you don't use for anything other than spam it's still wise to protect it, just in case of any other links. You'd be surprised just how little information someone needs to make a link between things and go after master accounts and such.

It's a spam account in that it's got nothing on it at all, doesn't even have email access.

It wouldn't store the password security on registered, it's a pretty old account from before they had the strength indicator :p.

I wouldn't think they'd use plain text or reversible encryption but I am starting to worry that they do, even if they stored it in plain text, they wouldn't allow you to see the password and would still require you reset the password.

"whats so hard to understand? if you password is hashed, then they've hashed common passwords and compare them to your hash,which ends up being the same."

Do you work for microsoft, can you say you've seen the database scheme to comment like you know exactly how their database is setup ?

whats so hard to understand? if you password is hashed, then they've hashed common passwords and compare them to your hash,which ends up being the same.

Probably this.

I wager it is a simple look up to see what matches to common hashed items that they gleaned from hacker attempts, and also just basic common passwords that everyone and their brother use).

Best method to confirm would contact the Hotmail team/devs and look into it.

It's a spam account in that it's got nothing on it at all, doesn't even have email access.

It wouldn't store the password security on registered, it's a pretty old account from before they had the strength indicator :p.

I wouldn't think they'd use plain text or reversible encryption but I am starting to worry that they do, even if they stored it in plain text, they wouldn't allow you to see the password and would still require you reset the password.

"whats so hard to understand? if you password is hashed, then they've hashed common passwords and compare them to your hash,which ends up being the same."

Do you work for microsoft, can you say you've seen the database scheme to comment like you know exactly how their database is setup ?

vcfan has not, unless I am mistaken. However I have...I worked on a team that was directly responsible for the monitoring and safety of Xbox LIVE so I have more than a little experience in this matter.

I cannot comment on specifics (of course for security reasons), but there's no need to worry about the level of security employed here. Just don't use an easy password...that's the point of that message. Easy passwords can be guessed without any sort of skill really required.

They store them as a plain text file trust me ive seen it, i know your passwords! lol =P

Nah as said they will have a list of common passwords encrypted however they encrypt there passwords, they will then probably do a match up when you change your password and give you a warning if it matches one of the encrypted ones on there list. Shouldnt be anything to worry about, but if you are then just make it harder symbols and numbers are always nice.

whats so hard to understand? if you password is hashed, then they've hashed common passwords and compare them to your hash,which ends up being the same.

But if you throw in salt, even the same password would not generate the same hash... because of the salt.

And I would hope they store salted passwords :-/

I would expect that they use salted hashes, which would mean you couldn't compare it against a pre-calculated list of encrypted hashes either. More likely, the server tries to *guess* your password from a list of common passwords, meaning it would have to generate a salted hash for each password and compare it to the salted hash of your password. But for a small list of common passwords (100-1000), this would only take a fraction of a second to test for each account registration / password change.

Bear in mind that as you said, you just logged in. As part of the logging in process, you provided an unencrypted version of your password. It would be easy as part of the login process for them to check that against a stored list of weak passwords, and forward you on to a page warning you of its weakness, no need to be able to decrypt the stored password to do that.

Maybe i am just being dumb here but

when you type in a username it automatically check to see if thats available using ajax/jquery for example

whats stopping it doing the same for passwords before its encrypted?

Another "maybe I am dumb" question here..

Isn't it the case that when you create a password, that it would be transmitted unhashed anyway? (plaintext - over SSL of course!) So the server receives it as plaintext and can easily do text comparison to a list of unsecure passwords?

Then when it saves it, it would salt+hash the password. When you login, it would do the same thing - transmit plaintext, then the server hashes it and compares it with the stored hash?

Right you are, it does send the password unencrypted! I always assumed it uses client-side javascript to MD5 it which is why I assumed it sent the details to an 'md5crum' page but it doesn't! Learn something new every day :p

Right you are, it does send the password unencrypted! I always assumed it uses client-side javascript to MD5 it which is why I assumed it sent the details to an 'md5crum' page but it doesn't! Learn something new every day :p

Well they're using HTTPS so it's technically still secure... Right?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!