Server 2012, Incremental Hyper-V Client BackUps

By Roger H.
in Microsoft (Windows)

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

Roger H. Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

OK so did a migration few weeks ago and it's been working just fine and dandy:

https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1111605-hyper-v-exchange-2010-storage-sizing/

So as you can see from there I have 1 physical server with 2 Virtual servers as well.

We were using a client software (ShadowProtect) to backup SBS 2003R2 but now planning to use Windows Server Backup as it does all that's needed for local backups (and no longer having to pay for the service means cheaper). I am testing Windows Azure to just backup the stuff off-site (since it integrates with Windows Server Backup) and seems cheaper too than the service we were using before (likr $50/500GB vs $135).

Anyways, seems like the built in backup can't really do incrementals of Hyper-Vs from the main server so i'm thinking of setting up server backup on the individual machines then point them to the 1TB USB HDD hooked up to the server.

Not sure that would work either so anyone got any ideas?

Grand Master

ANON86364

Posted
Posted

ShadowProtect is fantastic but costly if you are to backup each virtual server which is what I'm guessing you want to avoid.

A couple options:

1. If you have the virtual machines able to access the host, you could share out the USB drive and point the Windows Server Backup to it. That would work just fine for basic file backups.

2. Myself, I have iSCSI targets on a host HyperV server for each virtual machine to backup to. This is mainly because SBS 2011 Backup doesn't support backing up to a network share.

3. Set your USB drive to offline in Disk Management and mount the raw disk to the virtual machine in HyperV. You now have a raw disk available to your VM. You would have to have one USB drive per VM.

Grand Master

Roger H. Veteran

Posted
  • Author
  • Veteran
Posted

Thanks for the suggestions. I'll check out a few things that i've been pondering also. If any are viable i'll post them here as solutions for others :)

The main reason i wanna do this though is to avoid uploading 120GB or all the time to the offsite backup (8Mbps upload). If the host does backup it works except it does a FULL backup for both VMs every single time it backs up.

I saw someone mention creating a VHD file on a share then mounting it in the VM which would then allow you to incrementally update it since the VM thinks it's a "local" hdd even if it's on a remote storage somewhere :) (Could work for you Xenosion) Just want to do offsite backup but without the crazy big files to upload!

On the file server, i get about 300-500MB/s of changes in a day (mostly new pictures taken or documents/PDFs downloaded) so that's easy to upload but not so much for 100GB+!

Grand Master

fusi0n

Posted
Posted

how much is your data worth?

$1000

$2000

$10,000

$100,000

how much is it worth to be able to instantly recover or a complete recover in 15 to 30 min?

I'm interested in this technology.. It takes hours to recover some files with our SAN

Grand Master

sc302 Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

but yet you put a price tag on your backup.

Well this solution is a complete DR solution in one box. It will backup, it will image, it will bare metal restore to dissimilar hardware or to hyper-v or to vmware, and it can bring up that image on itself for a near instant recovery. While this isn't inexpensive, the cost is similar to purchasing backup exec and purchasing the hardware to support backup exec. The difference is that with backup exec every server/computer that it touches and every db that it touches has to get licensed, with this appliance no matter how many computers or servers you are backing up it is all covered under one price. To backup 10 servers/computers it was 5000 from backup exec, plus 2000 in maintanence and that was just for the software without deduplication or baremetal restore....for 10,000 I was able to get maintainence, hardware and all the features that I would have had to pay a crap load more for backupexec.

I am currently trying to find a way to duplicate this on my own hardware with my own software package but I keep coming up with dead ends. There aren't may companies who offer a complete DR solution like this, and the ones that do don't offer it at the price point that they do or have all of the features that they do.

http://www.unitrends.com

Watch the video, it is an impressive product. But it all depends on what you think your data is worth, and what peace of mind is worth.

http://www.unitrends...t-recovery.html

more info

http://www.unitrends...and-vmware.html

http://www.unitrends...t-recovery.html

Grand Master

Roger H. Veteran

Posted
  • Author
  • Veteran
Posted

Instant recovery sounds similar to Hyper-V Replication which basically keeps another server with replicated data between the 2 so if one machine dies you can (manually) put the other online replacing the main one right away. Guess I have the other 2 servers sitting around so just would have to buy some RAM and HDD for those and install Hyper-V Server 2012 on it (which is free by the way :) ).

Guess i'll see how this thing goes with what I'm testing now before deciding how to go.

Grand Master

sc302 Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

keeps it replicated between the two, keeps it replicated with live deletes and oopses as well as corruption. that is just one part, it is also a backup which will recover you opsies or user issues with deletes. you could do similar with shadow copies but they are easily corruptable. Oh and this device has the capability of encrypting sending it to another device at another location or to their cloud storage so if your site or sites were to experiance a catrostrophic failure, it would be off site in a few other states. It is a complete backup and disaster recovery appliance, it isn't just a live replica..that is just one feature.

Go through the features here, it is a bit more than replication.

http://www.unitrends.com/features.html

Just an example:

  • Hyper-V HOS-level backup: Completely protect your Hyper-V virtual machines without creating a huge backup footprint. Unitrends performs incremental backups by leveraging Change Block Tracking (CBT).
  • Complete Unitrends protection: Unitrends? full feature set applies to your virtual systems. Your data is protected by Unitrends Incremental Forever, which offers 15-minute incremental backups and point-in-time restores; applications and OSs are protected with Bare Metal restore.

  • 2 months later...
Neowinian

jonduc

Posted
Posted

here's a short answer to a quick way to achieve what you want. after browsing for days and experimenting with scripts I gave up because i needed those incrementals, too. the program is called backup chain and I spoke to support before told them what I needed and they helped me understand the concepts better. found the tool got everything done without breaking the bank.

Veteran

REM2000

Posted
Posted

Look at Acronis, i use their products to backup Windows servers of various types (File/SQL/Exchange/SharePoint), this includes physical and VM's under Hyper-V 2008R2. Very reliable, and very easy to restore, either the whole machine as a VM/baremetal as well as restoring only the files needed instead of the whole machine.

Grand Master

majortom1981

Posted
Posted

OK so did a migration few weeks ago and it's been working just fine and dandy:

http://www.neowin.ne...storage-sizing/

So as you can see from there I have 1 physical server with 2 Virtual servers as well.

We were using a client software (ShadowProtect) to backup SBS 2003R2 but now planning to use Windows Server Backup as it does all that's needed for local backups (and no longer having to pay for the service means cheaper). I am testing Windows Azure to just backup the stuff off-site (since it integrates with Windows Server Backup) and seems cheaper too than the service we were using before (likr $50/500GB vs $135).

Anyways, seems like the built in backup can't really do incrementals of Hyper-Vs from the main server so i'm thinking of setting up server backup on the individual machines then point them to the 1TB USB HDD hooked up to the server.

Not sure that would work either so anyone got any ideas?

Where are you finding that price for azure? Everything I see states a $500 minimum

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Posts

    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC

      By WaltC · Posted

      How old is this tip? Seems 15-20 years old? Processor states for the CPU under Windows power options has been a thing for a long, long time. It certainly isn't new or hidden... Also, with laptops it doesn't make any difference what OS you are running, all of them are configured for battery longevity over performance, for obvious reasons.
    • UK to ban under-16s from social media following a six-week trial with teenagers

      By WaltC · Posted

      I can't believe Starmer is still there...his party lost so big. He's a stubborn coot, but this is largely unenforceable, so I would imagine he'll be resigning soon. A key here is for parents to buy their kids phones sans Internet access--and set up the Internet at home, where mom and day can, you know, act like parents instead expecting the government to raise their kids.
    • EA launches in-game advertising platform for brands to "connect with audiences"

      By LoneWolfSL · Posted

      EA launches in-game advertising platform for brands to "connect with audiences" by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe The gaming giant Electronic Arts is exploring more ways to inject real-life brands into its games. Announced today as EA Advertising, the new platform is attempting to make it easier for brands to reach out for deals with the company and put their products inside titles like EA Sports FC, Madden, NHL, Skate, or The Sims. EA revealed that its EA Sports side of the company brings in "hundreds of millions of players across console, PC, and mobile" every year. Fan engagement of these titles was also touted as being "extraordinary," with 23,000 NFL seasons worth of games being played in Madden NFL daily, while EA Sports FC sees over a billion matches a day. “Players come to EA’s games and live experiences every day to play, watch, create and connect,” said David Tinson, Chief Experiences Officer at Electronic Arts. “That gives brands a meaningful opportunity to show up in ways that add value and respect the player experience, while maintaining authenticity in the worlds our teams are building. With EA Advertising, we’re helping brands become part of those moments in ways that are relevant and built for players.” Using the new program EA Advertising, brands will be able to inject their products into games in real-time via dynamic placement. EA says partners will have access to everything from stadium signage in sports games and targeted adverts to in-game content custom-made for the brands. These are described as additions designed to "enhance, not disrupt" experiences. "In these interactive gameplay environments, brands become part of the game itself, reflecting how players engage with advertising in real-world contexts," adds the company "Brands can activate across live environments, tailoring placements to meet campaign objectives, and update campaigns with ongoing optimization informed by aggregated engagement insights." Current real-world brand partnerships EA has built into its games include Visa (EA Sports FC and College Football), Lowe's (EA Sports FC, Madden NFL, and College Football), Red Bull (EA SPORTS FC), Xfinity and Peacock (EA SPORTS FC), and Mountain Dew’s (College Football).
    • UK to ban under-16s from social media following a six-week trial with teenagers

      By suni08 · Posted

      Will be surprised if there isn't a new ver of youtube just for labelled educational content
    • UK to ban under-16s from social media following a six-week trial with teenagers

      By zikalify · Posted

      UK to ban under-16s from social media following a six-week trial with teenagers by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels A few months ago, Neowin reported that the UK was trialing a social media ban with 300 teenagers for six weeks, that testing has come to an end, and Prime Minister Keir Starmer has announced that the country will ban under-16s from social media. Starmer said that this technology is making children unhappy and making it easier for bullies to harass and abuse them. He continued to talk about the addictive nature of social media, saying that it uses an infinite scroll designed to lock users in for hours. He said this interferes with children doing their homework, reading, playing with friends outside, and going to bed on time. Tackling the idea that nothing can be done about social media, Starmer said: The government’s action won’t stop at social media either, the PM said. It plans to take action on gaming services and livestreaming platforms. Right now, he said, strangers can contact any child unchecked. He said this wouldn’t happen in real life, and the government is going to stop it from happening online, too. The Labour government has overseen the introduction of the Online Safety Act, a big change to the internet which includes age verification on adult websites. This has led to a fair bit of backlash, but overall, the government is pushing ahead with these changes.

  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      511
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      200
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      136
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      91
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      84
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!