Keira Knightly has boobs?


Recommended Posts

Foxnews.com

Keira Knightley on her breasts: 'They're so small people aren't interested' Nov 13, 2012 9:35 AM EST

The normally private Keira Knightley stripped down and got personal for the December cover of Allure magazine. In the issue, out Nov. 20, the "Anna Karenina" actress talked about her weight, her love life and even her chest size.

"They always pencil in my boobs. I was only angry when they were really droopy," she said, referring to her experience working on "King Arthur." "I thought, well if you're going to make me fantasy breasts, at least make perky breasts."

The actress explained she doesn't mind baring her breasts for the camera, because "they're so small-people really aren't that interested." But her bottom half, that's another story. "Sex scenes in films - I'm quite rigorous about what gets exposed...no bottom half!" she said.

The "Pirates of the Caribbean" star told the magazine even though she exposes her body on film, it doesn't mean she is totally comfortable with it. When her thin figure sparked rumors she was anorexic, she said it hit her "pretty hard."

"Because you go, oh, maybe that's right! I knew I wasn't anorexic, but maybe my body is somehow not right," she said. "When you're going through a period where you're really getting a lot of criticism, you go, maybe all this is right!"

So to keep her personal life out of the mouths of critics, Knightley is notoriously private about her relationship with fianc? James Righton, keyboardist for the Klaxons. She told Allure she has no clue how she will handle the publicity of her wedding.

"Maybe I'll be permanently engaged!" she joked.

And she expects living in the spotlight will only get harder as she gets older. "It's very, very hard on women who get older...I can say that when I'm 27, you know. Talk to me when I'm 37."

But Knightley is willing to take the criticism because she said landing a career in acting is a rare feat.

"Acting - it's not like its offered one day, so it will be offered the next. There's a little space for you. And when that space appears, you kind of have to jump in because it's not necessarily going to arrive again."

I really haven't been concerned about it. But I thought this would be nice to post. Just hope Hum didn't beat me to it.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1119176-keira-knightly-has-boobs/
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I'm not unblocking my camera for this crapola. Sorry, Google.
    • Ummmm that is what is it supposed to do. Just turn if off in settings if you do not want it analyzing your open tabs. Chrome does the same thing with Gemini. Sarfari will do the samething after Apple's AI and even more so with the release of their 27 versions that is now powered by Googles LLM/ML models. Understanding why it is doing it and how it can help you vs jumping to some conspiracy theroy is a much better approach. As long as it can be turned off, all is good. Yes the default should be off but the a lot of people would never discover these features.
    • Just another reason (aside from many others) not to use Edge. Firefox 153.0b5 DEx64 has a similar feature added recently in prior builds that I will turn off at some point when I get around to it. It's the new "Something looks suspicious" page that pops up here and there. It cleverly hides itself between web pages that I've actually visited; as a result, you know, of selecting a web page and telling the browser where to go. The interesting thing is that it does not produce these warnings from pages that I, as the only intelligent user of the browser in my system, have ever directed the browser to open! What seems to be happening is that the browser looks at all the goofy ad links on a web page I do actually open and selects one that "looks suspicious" and then creates the "something looks suspicious" web page, which is neatly inserted, as mentioned, between web pages my RB ("real brain") has directed the browser to load in a session. The thing is, I usually look at links I am considering to follow before I ask the browser to load them, and in cases I have noticed where the link does indeed look suspicious, most of the time I will choose to not follow the link at all. Doesn't everyone do this or something similar? I am picky about what I voluntarily load... (I don't like links that start off fine, with a site designaiton that seems normal enough but then is followed by indecipherable alphanumeric strings many, many lines long, etc. I tend to reject those because they look suspicious. They may not be, but I don't care... I'll stay with Firefox, of course, if for no other reason than they usually let you turn off the junk you don't like. And because it isn't Edge... But at some point Microsoft will come to realize that putting your bookmarks on the left side is a Good Thing for a lot of people, just as Microsoft discovered when it had the bright idea of nailing the Windows taskbar to the bottom of the screen, when for decades Microsoft browsers had left that placement up to the user. They have finally reversed the obscenity of that decision. Finally.
    • Google was using the old CATPCHAs data to train their LLMs. What is the say they won't use this camera data of users to train their LLM? these companies need some strict regulations!
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      258
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      94
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!