Why Android really is the new Windows


Recommended Posts

Summary: The figures don't lie: Android not only has almost three-quarters of global mobile device sales, but it's outselling PCs too. So the Linux-based OS is the new Windows, not only due to its ubiquity, but because it represents a key aspect of Windows that Microsoft is throwing away: openness.

Analyst figures can be a dry affair, but sometimes they're so stark that they make the future a bit clearer. That's the case with the mobile sales numbers that came out of Gartner yesterday.

It seems that Android really is the new Windows. By extension, that means Linux ? on which Android is based ? is currently whipping ten shades out of Microsoft and indeed everyone else. How times change.

Gartner's figures cover mobile device sales in the third quarter of this year. Android has gone into overdrive: unit sales more than doubled year-on-year to 122.5 million, and the platform has a market share of 72.4 percent, up from 52.5 percent a year before. That's in mobile devices, not just smartphones.

Apple's iOS is in second place, with quarterly device sales up from 17.3 million to 23.5 million, but its market share down from 15 percent to 13.8 percent. Other mobile OSes are all in the single digits, from RIM's 5.3 percent share down to Microsoft's 2.4 percent.

Now compare this data with what Gartner said a month ago about PC shipments in the same quarter. The grand total for Q3? 87.5 million units. A year-on-year drop of 8.3 percent, since you ask.

In other words, Android device sales have an almost 3:2 ratio compared with PC shipments ? and remember that shipments are always greater than sales (unless the product sells out). At this rate, the ratio will be 2:1 within a quarter or two.

Ouch

Caveats apply, of course, but I don't think any are major enough to provide an alternative explanation for this trend. Maybe people delayed PC-buying decisions in anticipation of the Windows 8 launch? Microsoft's upgrade programme cancels out this theory to some degree. Also, this is the back-to-school quarter.

No, this is a real trend. And before you go, "Ah, but smartphones and PCs are not the same thing", well, for many people they are. Think of all those in emerging markets who have never owned a PC and never will. They're increasingly getting their windows on the web ? which is the real winner here, in some respects ? through handsets and tablets.

Even in the so-called developed world, these devices are usurping the PC for many functions, from web browsing to communications, and even for light document editing.

And Android is winning, on cost and (drum roll) on openness.

Open for business

Why openness? Because there are many app stores out there for Android, and because apps can even be loaded without getting it via a marketplace at all. You and I in the US and Europe may not ever venture outside the confines of Apple's App Store and Google's Play Store, but believe me, the alternatives are out there and heavily used, particularly in countries such as China and Russia.

You know what's funny about this? Android is winning, partly because it represents what Windows used to represent: flexibility.

It may seem a bit unfair to say "used to" there, but it's really not. Microsoft has been very clear that starting with Windows 8, it now wants to control its app ecosystem Apple-style.

It's correct in calculating that this will lead to a higher standard of app, but it's wrong if it thinks this will give it any kind of edge against Apple (which offers the same deal but is far further down the road in terms of building an ecosystem). It's also utterly deluded if it thinks most people care about the "uncontrolled" nature of Android.

The desktop won't go away ? it's still needed for many types of content creation, and that will stay the case for a long time yet. But the smartphone and the tablet are computers too, and in the overall picture, Android is taking over the world.

http://www.zdnet.com/android-really-is-the-new-windows-7000007450/

Why is probably won't be the new Windows:

-Fragmentation.

-Lots of potential competition.

-Patent issues.

-Might have already peaked in terms of sales.

Android hardware producers:

-Samsung are the company dominating the sales, their Android phones are a big part of their revenue but not the majority of their $247bn revenue.

-HTC the second biggest get the majority of their revenue from Android sales, they are struggling to get over $10bn of revenue.

Windows hardware producers:

-HP get the majority of their revenue from windows hardware, revenue of $127bn.

-Dell get the majority of their revenue from windows hardware, revenue of $63bn.

-Intel $54bn

No.

Why is probably won't be the new Windows:

Fragmentation.

Lots of potential competition.

Patent issues.

Might have already peaked in terms of sales.

Also your sale figures, a teenager will maybe get a computer every 5 years, some longer and some shorter. A family may have one computer but could have 2,3,4+ android devices. So you can't directly compare the sales directly of mobiles and PC's. A slightly more fair comparison would be android tablets to Windows.

(Y)

Sorry android, not happening. Windows is still Windows. Everyone still wants a PC, they still want it to be Windows. Businesses aren't throwing them out to buy tablets. They are adding tablets into a dominent Windows infrastructure. Android devices are just an additional thing people buy now. Just like when Microwaves came out. You didn't throw out your old oven. It just gave you more flexibility.

I know why 99% people around me use Android: easy to pirate. Go figure.

Yea and as if windows is any more difficult

Android would / will never be a PC OS, it would be horrendous, its bad enough on a tablet at times

Why is probably won't be the new Windows:

-Fragmentation.

-Lots of potential competition.

-Patent issues.

-Might have already peaked in terms of sales.

Android hardware producers:

-Samsung are the company dominating the sales, their Android phones are a big part of their revenue but not the majority of their $247bn revenue.

-HTC the second biggest get the majority of their revenue from Android sales, they are struggling to get over $10bn of revenue.

Windows hardware producers:

-HP get the majority of their revenue from windows hardware, revenue of $127bn.

-Dell get the majority of their revenue from windows hardware, revenue of $63bn.

-Intel $54bn

That fragmentation bit is BS. None of the top 4 mobile OSes have 100% of the user base using the latest version, yet Android is the only one who gets crap for it.

Why is probably won't be the new Windows:

-Fragmentation.

-Lots of potential competition.

-Patent issues.

-Might have already peaked in terms of sales.

Android hardware producers:

-Samsung are the company dominating the sales, their Android phones are a big part of their revenue but not the majority of their $247bn revenue.

-HTC the second biggest get the majority of their revenue from Android sales, they are struggling to get over $10bn of revenue.

Windows hardware producers:

-HP get the majority of their revenue from windows hardware, revenue of $127bn.

-Dell get the majority of their revenue from windows hardware, revenue of $63bn.

-Intel $54bn

You should know that past performance doesn't equal future performance.

In other words... The future is not today.Predictions are much more complex than that...

speaking of fragmentation, look at w$, they have at least 3 'environments' right now with their brand "new" OS. One for tablets, one for desktop and one for phones. They cant see each other properly, only in the "cloud". And if they can share something between, need a "proxy" program, which makes the compatibility useless by definition. In the other hand, Android EVERYTHING is transparent, where it shares in between without need anything else more than a cable or an ip. Nothing proxy like itunes and yet another thing that m$ copy from apple (oh great idea!).

Android would grow up more than they think, not only with the 3rd quater of the market but just like everything. And remember, its OPEN SOURCE and FREE.

This is nonsense right from the summary.

"The figures don't lie: Android not only has almost three-quarters of global mobile device sales, but it's outselling PCs too. So the Linux-based OS is the new Windows, not only due to its ubiquity, but because it represents a key aspect of Windows that Microsoft is throwing away: openness."

ZDNET living up to it's usual garbage standards. :s

That fragmentation bit is BS. None of the top 4 mobile OSes have 100% of the user base using the latest version, yet Android is the only one who gets crap for it.

Im pretty sure Android gets crap because for the longest time the majority of their figures were based of $50 Chinese pieces of **** running android 2-2.2...and lets face it, the numbers are high because of the Chinese masses contributing to the very open (read hackable) mobile OS...

The platform is already independently reviewed as being the most malware ridden platform available and from a developer point of view even though it has a massive piece of the market share, most developers are making significantly less thaan they do on iOS....

You know as well as everyone else that until droid 4.1 the lag and stutter and performance was ridiculously bad....and even more recently Google has eye balled the likes of Acer for daring to release a Chinese version of what was originally Android basically threatening to cut them off if they didn't stop releasing...

Sure Samsung and HTC have done a very excellent job with their flagship phones but in reality its all because they wanted to get a toe into the mobile OS market and this was the most open platform i.e. open source (kinda) that they could get in and hack around with because tha laternative to this and prior to them getting on board with Android they had shithouse Symbian type crap with a different skin every phone that was released and NO APPS...

I think, generally speaking of course, that these are some of the reasons droid gets cained....

its also funny to note that as soon as Apple mauled Samsung Google quietly ran over to Acer and began stroking them?? and how they really really really don't like Amazon kindle even though that's based on droid as well....kinda crazy don't ya think???

speaking of fragmentation, look at w$, they have at least 3 'environments' right now with their brand "new" OS. One for tablets, one for desktop and one for phones. They cant see each other properly, only in the "cloud". And if they can share something between, need a "proxy" program, which makes the compatibility useless by definition. In the other hand, Android EVERYTHING is transparent, where it shares in between without need anything else more than a cable or an ip. Nothing proxy like itunes and yet another thing that m$ copy from apple (oh great idea!).

Android would grow up more than they think, not only with the 3rd quater of the market but just like everything. And remember, its OPEN SOURCE and FREE.

dude what you smoking??? 3 environments...u mean the only platform that can seamlessly play nice on three screens??? what do you mean cant see each other properly??? I mean what do you base that on exactly...just because everything works seamlessly through cloud doesn't mean it cant work any other way like nfc, wifi lan etc...

why don't you try connecting your Droid PC, phone and gaming console together ...oh wait they don't produce 2 of those...

when the droid idiots spend a lot less time fingering their phones and actually using a computer to work on and produce something we might sort out the non stop wanking these people engage in...

its a freaking phone, get over it and get back to whatever social not working you were up to before you shat in the comment box...

  • Like 3

That fragmentation bit is BS. None of the top 4 mobile OSes have 100% of the user base using the latest version, yet Android is the only one who gets crap for it.

Indeed i would understand if the majority of apps only worked on Android 4.0+ however most apps will work on Android 2.2 and up, which was released over 2 and a half years ago.

Microsoft shills still blather on about fragmentation, and Android phones are still selling in massive numbers. How many years does Android have to blow Windows Phone away for before you admit that fragmentation is nothing more than a boring buzzphrase that means nothing to consumers?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
    • Usually the bigger ones with many fixes/changes take a few, theyre an exception to the rule most likely
    • If you don’t get lucky with Valve’s Steam Machine reservation system, you can make your own Steam Machine instead. Valve says that “starting with the SteamOS 3.8 release, you can put together your own Steam Machine using whatever PC parts you want.” SteamOS 3.8.10 launched last week with a slew of updates, including “improved compatibility with recent Intel and AMD platforms.” Alongside that improved compatibility, Valve is giving gamers the green light to install SteamOS on their own desktops. In an interview with The Verge, Valve’s Pierre-Loup Griffais said Valve has been “rolling out improvements to [SteamOS] so it’s more compatible with desktop hardware,” including eventual support for Nvidia graphics. Griffais says Valve has “a growing team” working on Nvidia driver support for SteamOS, adding, “We’re collaborating with Nvidia very closely.” While he mentioned that Nvidia support might not come this year, Griffais emphasized that “it’s certainly something that we’re working on in the background.”     Subscription not needed: https://archive.fo/Tssfc Subscription needed: https://www.theverge.com/games/953411/valve-steamos-desktop-nvidia
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      452
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!