8 posts in this topic

When O.J. Simpson was found not guilty for the murder of his wife, Nicole Brown, and her friend, Ron Goldman, many speculated that the jury got it wrong.

But a new film created by Discovery Channel offshoot, Investigation Discovery, identified cross-country serial killer Glen Rogers as the person who murdered Brown and Goldman before he was convicted of killing the two other women in 1995.

The film claims that Rogers? name had never been mentioned before because Simpson kept his ties to the convicted killer under wraps.

Rogers alleged that Simpson hired him to break into Brown?s home and take her $20,000 earrings, and gave him permission to kill her if necessary.

He also claimed he had partied with Brown before and vowed to take her down.

Rogers didn?t confess to this crime until he was already serving years for the murder of two women, although he claims he?s murdered at least 20.

Rogers is on death row in Florida, while Simpson is serving life in person for armed robbery.

source

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Rogers alleged that Simpson hired him to break into Brown?s home and take her $20,000 earrings, and gave him permission to kill her if necessary.

If true, he still killed her even if he hired it done.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Still doesn't explain the black guy's voice heard at Nicole's house, the witness who saw him driving away, the cut on OJ's finger, the pounding on the wall Kato heard, the glove found at OJ's house, the long delay his limo driver had, waiting for OJ to answer the door, the touchiness OJ had about his luggage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If OJ Simpson is indecent enough to commit an armed robbery, threaten to kill people, make it appear as if he's going to kill them, and make people fear he's going to kill them, it's not unreasonable to suspect he might be capable of actually killing people. He's a terrible person even if he didn't kill them because he committed an armed robbery.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bruno Malgi shoe prints in the blood? I doubt this drifter had the money to own a pair of Brunos.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If true, he still killed her even if he hired it done.

But if it's true (a big if) the jury was still right cause it's a different accusation. Anyway in Canada it is maybe not ins USA though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bruno Malgi shoe prints in the blood? I doubt this drifter had the money to own a pair of Brunos.

Could have been OJ dropping by to see what happened.

OJ could have got a call from 'the real killer', and OJ went to look -- maybe for evidence left behind.

Wearing your usual daily shoes does not sound like a planned murder.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If OJ Simpson is indecent enough to commit an armed robbery, threaten to kill people, make it appear as if he's going to kill them, and make people fear he's going to kill them, it's not unreasonable to suspect he might be capable of actually killing people. He's a terrible person even if he didn't kill them because he committed an armed robbery.

You and I rarely agree but on this topic we do. OJ is a terrible person.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.