Jump to content

Welcome Guest! To access all forums & features, please register an account or sign-in. → Why register?




Photo

  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic - - - - -

#1 Hum

Hum

    totally wAcKed

  • 55,150 posts
  • Location: Odder Space
  • OS: Windows XP, 7

Posted 19 November 2012 - 16:34

When O.J. Simpson was found not guilty for the murder of his wife, Nicole Brown, and her friend, Ron Goldman, many speculated that the jury got it wrong.

But a new film created by Discovery Channel offshoot, Investigation Discovery, identified cross-country serial killer Glen Rogers as the person who murdered Brown and Goldman before he was convicted of killing the two other women in 1995.

The film claims that Rogers’ name had never been mentioned before because Simpson kept his ties to the convicted killer under wraps.

Rogers alleged that Simpson hired him to break into Brown’s home and take her $20,000 earrings, and gave him permission to kill her if necessary.

He also claimed he had partied with Brown before and vowed to take her down.

Rogers didn’t confess to this crime until he was already serving years for the murder of two women, although he claims he’s murdered at least 20.

Rogers is on death row in Florida, while Simpson is serving life in person for armed robbery.

source


#2 vetGrowled

Growled

    Resident Rockstar

  • 37,006 posts
  • Location: USA

Posted 20 November 2012 - 01:59

Rogers alleged that Simpson hired him to break into Brown’s home and take her $20,000 earrings, and gave him permission to kill her if necessary.


If true, he still killed her even if he hired it done.

#3 OP Hum

Hum

    totally wAcKed

  • 55,150 posts
  • Location: Odder Space
  • OS: Windows XP, 7

Posted 20 November 2012 - 14:42

Still doesn't explain the black guy's voice heard at Nicole's house, the witness who saw him driving away, the cut on OJ's finger, the pounding on the wall Kato heard, the glove found at OJ's house, the long delay his limo driver had, waiting for OJ to answer the door, the touchiness OJ had about his luggage.

#4 +Blank

Blank

    Neowinian DOMINATING

  • 7,513 posts
  • Location: Kansas, USA
  • OS: Windows 7
  • Phone: iPhone 5

Posted 20 November 2012 - 14:47

Still doesn't explain the black guy's voice heard at Nicole's house, the witness who saw him driving away, the cut on OJ's finger, the pounding on the wall Kato heard, the glove found at OJ's house, the long delay his limo driver had, waiting for OJ to answer the door, the touchiness OJ had about his luggage.


Black guys voice? Could've been this guy


#5 vetCalum

Calum

    Neowinian ULTRAKILL

  • 13,202 posts

Posted 20 November 2012 - 15:54

If OJ Simpson is indecent enough to commit an armed robbery, threaten to kill people, make it appear as if he's going to kill them, and make people fear he's going to kill them, it's not unreasonable to suspect he might be capable of actually killing people. He's a terrible person even if he didn't kill them because he committed an armed robbery.

#6 t_r_nelson

t_r_nelson

    Neowinian Senior

  • 2,102 posts
  • Location: Minneapolis, US

Posted 20 November 2012 - 15:58

Bruno Malgi shoe prints in the blood? I doubt this drifter had the money to own a pair of Brunos.

#7 LaP

LaP

    Forget about it

  • 3,420 posts
  • Location: Quebec City, Canada
  • OS: Windows 8 Pro

Posted 20 November 2012 - 16:02

If true, he still killed her even if he hired it done.


But if it's true (a big if) the jury was still right cause it's a different accusation. Anyway in Canada it is maybe not ins USA though.

#8 OP Hum

Hum

    totally wAcKed

  • 55,150 posts
  • Location: Odder Space
  • OS: Windows XP, 7

Posted 21 November 2012 - 00:10

Bruno Malgi shoe prints in the blood? I doubt this drifter had the money to own a pair of Brunos.


Could have been OJ dropping by to see what happened.

OJ could have got a call from 'the real killer', and OJ went to look -- maybe for evidence left behind.

Wearing your usual daily shoes does not sound like a planned murder.

#9 vetGrowled

Growled

    Resident Rockstar

  • 37,006 posts
  • Location: USA

Posted 21 November 2012 - 00:14

If OJ Simpson is indecent enough to commit an armed robbery, threaten to kill people, make it appear as if he's going to kill them, and make people fear he's going to kill them, it's not unreasonable to suspect he might be capable of actually killing people. He's a terrible person even if he didn't kill them because he committed an armed robbery.


You and I rarely agree but on this topic we do. OJ is a terrible person.



Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: investigation discovery, hired killer, death row florida, conspiracy