Facebook Enabling HTTPS by Default for North American Users


Recommended Posts

Facebook this week will begin turning on secure browsing be default for its millions of users in North America. The change will make HTTPS the default connection option for all Facebook sessions for those users, a shift that gives them a good baseline level of security and will help prevent some common attacks.

Facebook users have had the option of turning on HTTPS since early 2011 when the company reacted to attention surrounding the Firesheep attacks. However, the technology was not enabled by default and users have had to in and manually make the change in order to get the better protection of HTTPS.

Now, users will have to manually turn HTTPS off if they don't want it, a distinction that is a major change, especially for Facebook's massive user base, which has become a major target for attackers.

"As announced last year, we are moving to HTTPS for all users. This week, we're starting to roll out HTTPS for all North America users and will be soon rolling out to the rest of the world," the company said on its developer site.

The use of HTTPS by default is a significant change for Facebook, a site that handles millions and millions of Web requests every day, just from its North American users alone, and is under constant attack by hackers. One of the common techniques used to compromise many users is a man-in-the-middle attack, through which attackers intercept traffic between a client and the server for which it's intended. This attack is made much easier when that traffic is unencrypted and attackers don't need to do anything fancy in order to get to it.

HTTPS encrypts the connection between the user's machine and the server on the other end, obscuring it from attackers, even if they are able to sniff the traffic on the wire or on a wireless connection. The technology is by no means a cure-all for Web-based attacks, however, as there have been demonstrations of attacks that enable third parties to snoop on encrypted traffic and grab valuable data, such as usernames and passwords or financial information. In 2011 a pair of researchers developed a technique called the BEAST attack that essentially broke the confidentiality model of SSL--the encryption protocol used for HTTPS connections--by enabling attackers to steal and decrypt secure cookies.

Using HTTPS also won't protect you if there is malware on your machine that's capable of logging keystrokes. But it is an important change for a leading site such as Facebook, something that has become not just a social network but also an e-commerce platform. There are a number of other changes that users can make on their profiles and in their interactions with the site to help secure Facebook. See our How to Secure Facebook video for more suggestions.

https://threatpost.com/en_us/blogs/facebook-enabling-https-default-north-american-users-111912

I've been using HTTPS for a very long time now. You can enable it at Account Settings > Security Settings > Secure Browsing. Check off the box that says "Browse Facebook on a secure connection (https) when possible".

Sure hope so they do it to the rest of the world too. It should be standard.

Offtopic: i just noticed, on the 14th this month it was the 11th year Neowin Membership...woooow :)

Really glad i joined at that time, i was one of the first members n? 3576.

Well, this was long overdue if you ask me.

Glad to see better security rolled out as standard to more people though.

Better late than never. :)

Glassed Silver:mac

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • After watching the Apple event earlier this week it is quite the contrast. Apple is going back and tweaking the code to make things more efficient in may areas of MacOS. Windows is boosting your electric build to hide their issues.
    • It is silly there is no simple way to check whether this profile has been activated. CFRs are normal, but trying to even hide the fact if it's on / off seems silly, especially for something so user-facing. Surely Microsoft is "proud" of their engineering efforts on this one and ought to display it somwhere in the GUI.
    • Many Linux distros are not known for excellent battery life, so I'm not sure that is the best example. A more apt example may be Apple, but Apple's CPUs are simply far more efficient than Intel & AMD at single-threaded tasks like these, so "boosting" is not as power-hungry and less heat-inducing. Not to mention Apple will hardly engage P-cores for basic UI tasks; they use a pretty complicated QoS scheme to only activate P-cores for more serious workloads like HTML / JS execution or decompression or application launch. Microsoft is (smartly) doing it for launch, but also for UI tasks, which is the more nonsensical part: why ... do Windows 11's UIs need modern CPUs to boost? It should load so quickly that there's not even time for the CPU to boost.
    • I've not seen any controlled testing and, judging by Microsoft's mentality, within a year, they'll have added so much more bloat, it'll undo any perceptible latency benefit and we'll have boosted the CPU clocks for nothing.
    • It depends: heat soak is a thing. Initially on cold boot-up, the heatsinks & heatpipes are at ambient temp. After heatsinks & heatpipes warm up (through normal usage), they don't immediately cool to ambient temp when the load goes away. So their baseline is higher and the trigger point for fans is much less stress. Add a few more CPU spikes → it's too hot to stay at the same fan RPM → fans get triggered to start up up much sooner / get triggered to ramp much more quickly.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      198
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!