Linux Instead of Windows


Recommended Posts

I've gotta say, having switched to cinnamin from gnufail 3.6 recently, I find it pretty outstanding, it's still not perfect but it's darn close :) thanks to everyone that suggested to try it!

At the moment, the most limiting factor of linux in terms of graphics is that it uses X11 still, which is just old old OLD! OK so it does work on the world's oldest hardware and it doesn't need hardware accelleration at all, but because of that it doesn't support a lot of stuff. Once wayland becomes improved (it's still in it's infancy) then you'll be seeing very slick GNU/Linux graphics, and you even run multiple X11 sessions inside of wayland too.

Has anyone tried the new Elementary OS Luna Beta 1?

I tried it on virtual box and i have to say this is the only linux distro that actually made want to keep using it instead of windows!

http://elementaryos.org/journal/luna-beta-1-released

I'm using Linux Mint in a VMWare box full screen right now (typing this from there). Even in a VM, it runs great and what a polished OS! I'm still scared to switch to it as a main OS because I fear the command line and it seems you need a computer science degree to install any new drivers or software, lol.

Anyone here compared Mint to ubuntu? I have both installed and like Mint better, why I'm not sure yet.

Here's a question: My system has 2x 256GB SSD's and 2x 3TB HD's (Windows RAID0). Would I be able to install Linux on the second SSD and then have a dual boot menu? If I understand naming conventions, my SSD's are sda and sdb and the 2 HDD's are sdc and sdd. I would want to format sdb and install it there right? How can I make sure I'm not making a mistake and formatting my Windows 8 drive, like maybe Windows 8 is actually on sdb?

Always been a Fedora fan myself, I just wish Ubuntu would give the option to download an installer with Gnome shell instead of unity so I don't have to play in dependency hell. They were going to at one time.

Never cared for Linux much. I like some key factors about it in general. I try some distro's out every few years but always feels a step behind with 1 leg. Still no Netflix or even ITunes in Wine, I laughed at Banshee..etc for my Ipad, like really?. Never could get .AAC conversion to work in my car. Still had to google for things I wanted or needed to change only to still be forced to copy n paste command lines. No, not in 2012 I won't. THE main drawback for me was the software itself, either lacks some features/too basic or the UI is oldschool compared to some commercial apps that i'm used to on Windows, like Any video converter..etc. Thankfully Nvidia FINALLY released a decent and proper driver thanks to Valve's Steam. Not for Valve, NV wouldn't have done crap. Likely Steam will never offer the library selection like Windows but one can hope.

meh, w8 does everything I need it to, using Start8 and Decor8 to make the UI nicer, I can buy hardware and any software on a shelf, see its compatable and just plug it in with little to no fuss, no commands, no tricks or hours of google hunts.

Linux isn't an "easy-go" OS. You have to work at it. You learn Linux as you do Windows. If you had originally started with Linux, you would be calling Windows a bunch of crap.

  • Like 3
If you had originally started with Linux, you would be calling Windows a bunch of crap.

Personal preference. Grew up with Unix before there even was a Linux, and I personally still prefer to use Windows. As flexible, no not even close, but there's a lot to be said for the "it just works" factor.

Here's a question: My system has 2x 256GB SSD's and 2x 3TB HD's (Windows RAID0). Would I be able to install Linux on the second SSD and then have a dual boot menu? If I understand naming conventions, my SSD's are sda and sdb and the 2 HDD's are sdc and sdd. I would want to format sdb and install it there right? How can I make sure I'm not making a mistake and formatting my Windows 8 drive, like maybe Windows 8 is actually on sdb?

The drive naming is somewhat subjective. One of your SSD's could be sda one time and sdb the next time you reboot. That is why they are normally identified and mounted by their universally unique identifier (UUID). However, you don't need to worry about that because virtually any modern Linux installer will identify and mount them for you properly. As for installing Mint or Ubuntu on your secondary SSD, the easiest way to make sure you have the right drive is to go by partition labels. If, for example, your Windows installation on the first SDD has the partition label WINDOWS, the second SSD has a partition with the label RAR, you can use Disk Utility, GParted, or maybe even the installer from the live install disc to identify which drive contains WINDOWS and which contains RAR. The two 1 TB drives are easy to discard because of their size. Format the SSD containing RAR and install your Mint or Ubuntu. Each partition will be mounted properly from then on based on UUID.

Well, I tried first installing mint from a DVD from Windows 8 and it rebooted to complete then gave me some error. I uninstalled it then booted of the DVD and went to install, "didn't detect any installed operating systems". I'd hoped I could install this and dual boot.

Personal preference. Grew up with Unix before there even was a Linux, and I personally still prefer to use Windows. As flexible, no not even close, but there's a lot to be said for the "it just works" factor.

I definitely agree with you: to a large extent its personal preference. However, I, like many others here, I think, went the opposite way; I started with Windows and moved to Linux. While the "it just works" factor is certainly very important, I place more value on the customization aspect of the operating system. I like its open-source nature. I like the way that the operating system works. I don't mind the fact that it is not quite as easy to use, although Ubuntu is challenging even that, I value the other things that I mentioned more.

Well, I tried first installing mint from a DVD from Windows 8 and it rebooted to complete then gave me some error. I uninstalled it then booted of the DVD and went to install, "didn't detect any installed operating systems". I'd hoped I could install this and dual boot.

Try installing Mint by booting off of the installation disc directly. Don't install it from within Windows. Based on the setup you have described, using your secondary SSD as the boot disc, you probably want to install it natively, not using Wubi.

Linux isn't an "easy-go" OS. You have to work at it. You learn Linux as you do Windows. If you had originally started with Linux, you would be calling Windows a bunch of crap.

I really disagree with this. Linux UI has been dreadful in the past and I am very unhappy even now with Unity.

Out of the many problems with Linux and a lot of open source programs, programmers have designed UI and it's obvious.

Programmers should never be allowed to make UI as they never have understood good UI standards.

I always disliked the way Linus always wanted to model Linux after Unix. I really wished he would have had UI designed design the default UI as a standard and let people modify look and feel from there.

He could have taken some of the ideas like security from Unix, but not the command set and programmer look and feel.

I was thinking about trying SUSE or Fedora myself and checking out Gnome 3. I'm really likeing KDE, but it just weird sometimes in terms of drivers and what not. I installed the latest NVIDIA driver and I can't enable kwin anymore plus my boot screen looks ugly--instead of having the sexy silver k-gear with dots, its a pixalated white screen that looks like it's straight from 1985. I realize it's most likely NVIDIA's fault, but I'm tired of Linux getting treated like a 2nd class OS---like Windows and OS X are any better...pffftt....I hope Wayland really fixes a lot of the graphical glitches when we finally jump over and Valve bringing Steam over opens developers eyes and changes Linux for the better. I really love and enjoy Linux.

The problem is not the OS, it's the software... I know, I know there is "alternative" to everything, but most of the time, those "alternative" are not as good, incomplete or plain crap.

Since Windows is the dominant standard, followed by MacOS, it's hard to find "corporate" software for Linux, you know, like Adobe Photoshop, Illustrator, good programming tools like Visual Studio, iTune (hey, I have an iPad and iPod), AutoCAD, .... and the list goes on....

Again, I know WINE exist, but why "emulate" Windows? Just run the real thing instead and you'll have less bugs...

I've been on Ubuntu for a good 3 weeks now, and never went back to my Windows side yet. You know why? 90% of my programs were already open source. Open/Libre Office, VLC, Firefox, Minecraft, etc. The only programs I could not carry over was Photoshop CS5, but I find Gimp to be rather nice, once you start messing with it.

If it was plain crap, why would they put it in the repositories? Heck, you can run Windows in a Virtualbox from Linux...

Again, you have to learn it for it to work the way you want. Same way you start with any other software, no matter what OS.

The problem is not the OS, it's the software... I know, I know there is "alternative" to everything, but most of the time, those "alternative" are not as good, incomplete or plain crap.

Most people go into places like Best Buy to get their software. I do it too, at times. Until people can do the same for Linux, Linux will never take off. The multimedia apps for Linux is so lacking. I like Paintshop Pro and Photoshop Elements for graphics, much more than the Gimp.

The problem is not the OS, it's the software... I know, I know there is "alternative" to everything, but most of the time, those "alternative" are not as good, incomplete or plain crap.

Since Windows is the dominant standard, followed by MacOS, it's hard to find "corporate" software for Linux, you know, like Adobe Photoshop, Illustrator, good programming tools like Visual Studio, iTune (hey, I have an iPad and iPod), AutoCAD, .... and the list goes on....

Again, I know WINE exist, but why "emulate" Windows? Just run the real thing instead and you'll have less bugs...

There is a lot of "corporate", by which I assume you mean commercial, software available for Linux. However, you're right: for some occupations the selection of commercial software is weak. MATLAB, which I use on a regular basis and cannot do my job without, not only runs well on Linux, but is designed for Linux first. The version of MATLAB available for Windows is compiled with Cygwin, and the version for OS X uses X11. There is other software that I use for embedded development, such as the HI-TECH C compiler, that runs quite well on Linux. Qt and its development environment also work well on Linux. Therefore I contend that the availability of commercial software for Linux depends on your needs (and occupation). For me, its actually preferred.

As for WINE, its not designed to emulate the WIN32 API perfectly. (In fact, WINE stands for WINE Is Not an Emulator.) Its a stop-gap measure designed to help ease the transition to Linux, not to be used to run the majority of your software.

I'm a professional software developer, writing applications for Windows for nearly 15 years. Microsoft has done extensive UI research, actually contributing a lot to the UX community's understanding of workflows and how the human eye works and how to make UI's easy to use. *Comically, Windows 8 does not follow most of Microsoft's own UI guidelines, but at least it's still the "Windows" API at the core.

Linux's biggest strength is also its biggest weakness: There is no standard and everything can be tweaked to the user's liking. If two people on the street say they use Linux, there is a good chance that their two systems are completely different, with a totally different set of UI tools and APIs available. If they have KDE, Qt is installed. GNOME means there is Gtk. TWM means there may not be either. Maybe they don't even have a window manager because they use the command line. How am I supposed to write software for them? I have to provide a Qt, Gtk, and X11 version of everything because I can't count on a common API to be installed. It would not be very nice of me to force my users to install something they don't want just so they can run my program. There is no such thing as the "Linux UX"; the user experience changes from distribution to distribution depending on how the packagers have decided the system should look.

For Linux to become mainstream, this needs to be fixed. But this would take away one of the things people love about Linux, hence it can't ever become "mainstream". Instead, a particular flavor of Linux will have to stand out as "the one". It seems like 32-bit Ubuntu is making inroads in this regard, since it's the platform Valve will support with Steam. I suspect there will be an influx of Ubuntu users in the coming year but ironically this influx will tend to drive the Linux community away from Ubuntu and Canonical. The community wants Linux to succeed over Windows, but they don't want the necessary outcome for this to happen. Writing applications for Linux without forcing your user to install the UI library you want them to install is a nightmare.

Of course, if there is a standard and I have just missed it completely, please tell me. You will save me an incredible amount of work. :laugh:

  • Like 2

I've been on Ubuntu for a good 3 weeks now, and never went back to my Windows side yet. You know why? 90% of my programs were already open source. Open/Libre Office, VLC, Firefox, Minecraft, etc. The only programs I could not carry over was Photoshop CS5, but I find Gimp to be rather nice, once you start messing with it.

If it was plain crap, why would they put it in the repositories? Heck, you can run Windows in a Virtualbox from Linux...

Again, you have to learn it for it to work the way you want. Same way you start with any other software, no matter what OS.

This is the opposite for me. Most programs (read almost all) on Linux are on Windows already and it's much easier to start at the top and work your way down. In other words, Windows has a lot more programs that I enjoy that

would not run with Wine, but I can use Virtual Box or VMware on Windows to run Linux.

You guys know there are FREE (as in beer) programs to give you an entirely different look on your Windows desktop such as (Rainmeter and Samurize). You can customize them to the point that they don't even look like desktops anymore if you want, you can trick it out like a automobile and because they use layered effects, it hardly takes up any processor power.

I have never thought honestly that Linux was better than Windows (except for a few things like software repositories and maybe security through obscurity), it has worked for me for a long time and Linux while it's good, it's really not that good. Linux was over-hyped by a lot of hardcore users and when I tried it, I did like it, but hasn't wowed me or changed my world (the only exception to this is Asterisk which rocks).

Software is where I really have a hard time with Linux, almost all of it has the same port on Windows and it can't run the real windows programs that are quality. Some can run through Wine, but Wine is far from 100 percent.

I just use it as a test bed for my VM's and testing different web applications on different versions of PHP and mysql as well as Asterisk which is great, but I wouldn't run it on my desktop PC.

Also one more thing as I look at it. I have tried a lot of multimedia programs on Linux and they were not good. Even some DAW (Digital Audio Workstation) programs on Linux and they again were very basic and the UI was garbage.

On Windows there are a ton of DAW programs out there and of different qualities but there is more choice and more quality than the Linux community.

Free isn't always better. Sometimes it is worth it to pay for quality software. I know Richard Stallman isn't happy, but let him eat his toenails. I think working at a job is better than starving on a street corner if you know what I mean.

Open source has always had this hippy it has to be available to everyone and I think that is fine as long as Richard Stallman and the people agree with him are not in the movement.

Well obviously free isn't always better. I think it goes without saying that the general rule of thumb is having a large team of full-time workers creating a product is going to be better than sporatic partial code submissions from the spare time of people around the world, they've got motivation to get paid so are going to work on it pretty fast.

There are however some great pieces of free/open source software which are against the rule and actually better than paid alternatives.

I'm a professional software developer, writing applications for Windows for nearly 15 years. Microsoft has done extensive UI research, actually contributing a lot to the UX community's understanding of workflows and how the human eye works and how to make UI's easy to use. *Comically, Windows 8 does not follow most of Microsoft's own UI guidelines, but at least it's still the "Windows" API at the core.

Linux's biggest strength is also its biggest weakness: There is no standard and everything can be tweaked to the user's liking. If two people on the street say they use Linux, there is a good chance that their two systems are completely different, with a totally different set of UI tools and APIs available. If they have KDE, Qt is installed. GNOME means there is Gtk. TWM means there may not be either. Maybe they don't even have a window manager because they use the command line. How am I supposed to write software for them? I have to provide a Qt, Gtk, and X11 version of everything because I can't count on a common API to be installed. It would not be very nice of me to force my users to install something they don't want just so they can run my program. There is no such thing as the "Linux UX"; the user experience changes from distribution to distribution depending on how the packagers have decided the system should look.

For Linux to become mainstream, this needs to be fixed. But this would take away one of the things people love about Linux, hence it can't ever become "mainstream". Instead, a particular flavor of Linux will have to stand out as "the one". It seems like 32-bit Ubuntu is making inroads in this regard, since it's the platform Valve will support with Steam. I suspect there will be an influx of Ubuntu users in the coming year but ironically this influx will tend to drive the Linux community away from Ubuntu and Canonical. The community wants Linux to succeed over Windows, but they don't want the necessary outcome for this to happen. Writing applications for Linux without forcing your user to install the UI library you want them to install is a nightmare.

Of course, if there is a standard and I have just missed it completely, please tell me. You will save me an incredible amount of work. :laugh:

Nice to hear from a software developers perspective and everything you say seems spot on. If Linux ever did become mainstream, commercial developers would have to make their source code open and I can't see how that would be a good thing for someone trying to sell and support software.

Anyways, a previous user mentioned Fedora so I installed it in a vm. It seems very vanilla and virtually everything I installed had to download prerequisites. I should this the appeal of Fedora?

"If Linux ever did become mainstream, commercial developers would have to make their source code open and I can't see how that would be a good thing for someone trying to sell and support software."

No they wouldn't. Go and look at nvidia drivers, or steam for linux, etc.

Trying KUbuntu right now and I like it. Do people generally accept KDE or Gnome more? KDE seems less Windows-like than Gnome, at least on this Ubuntu distro...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • We now know when and how the Universe may truly end by Sayan Sen Image by Marek Pavlík via Pexels| Not representative A study by physicist Henry Tye of Cornell University suggests that the universe may not expand forever. Instead, it could eventually stop expanding, begin contracting and end in a "Big Crunch" roughly 20 billion years from now. The research, published in the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, was conducted by Tye, Horace White Professor of Physics Emeritus at Cornell University. Using recent observations from major dark-energy surveys, Tye and his collaborators developed a cosmological model that predicts the universe could have a total lifespan of about 33 billion years. Since the universe is currently estimated to be 13.8 billion years old, the model places it near the midpoint of its existence. According to Cornell University's summary of the research, the study centers on the cosmological constant, a term introduced by Albert Einstein in his theory of general relativity. In modern cosmology, the cosmological constant is commonly used to describe the simplest form of dark energy, the unknown phenomenon believed to be driving the accelerating expansion of the universe. "For the last 20 years, people believed that the cosmological constant is positive, and the universe will expand forever," Tye said in a Cornell University news release. "The new data seem to indicate that the cosmological constant is negative, and that the universe will end in a big crunch." The study draws on data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), two major projects designed to investigate the nature of dark energy. According to Tye, recent observations suggest that dark energy may not behave exactly like a simple cosmological constant. To account for those observations, Tye and his collaborators proposed a model involving an extremely light hypothetical particle that evolves over time. In their calculations, this produces a negative cosmological constant and leads to a future collapse of the universe. The model predicts that cosmic expansion would continue for approximately another 11 billion years before reaching a maximum size, after which the universe would begin contracting and eventually collapse. Scientists have long debated how the universe might end. As explained in an article published in The Conversation by Stephen DiKerby of Michigan State University, several possibilities have been proposed. If dark energy remains constant and positive, the universe could continue expanding indefinitely, gradually becoming colder, darker and more diffuse in a scenario often called the "heat death" of the universe. Other theoretical possibilities include a Big Rip, in which cosmic expansion accelerates so dramatically that galaxies, stars and even atoms are torn apart, or a Big Crunch, in which expansion reverses and the universe collapses back into an extremely dense state. DiKerby notes that the Big Crunch idea itself is not new. What distinguishes Tye's work is that it attempts to use current observational data to estimate when such a collapse might occur and how it could unfold. Much of the universe's long-term evolution remains uncertain. According to current astrophysical understanding, stars will continue to form and die for billions of years. The Sun, for example, is about halfway through its expected lifespan. Galaxies are also expected to continue merging; the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies are projected to collide several billion years from now. At the same time, the nature of dark energy remains one of the biggest unanswered questions in cosmology. While observations indicate that the universe's expansion is accelerating, scientists still do not know what is causing that acceleration. Future observations may therefore alter current predictions about the cosmos's ultimate fate. Tye emphasized that additional evidence will be needed before firm conclusions can be drawn. DESI continues to collect data, while upcoming observations from missions and observatories including Euclid, SPHEREx and the Vera C. Rubin Observatory are expected to provide more precise measurements of dark energy. "People have said before that if the cosmological constant is negative, then the universe will collapse eventually. That's not new," Tye said. "However, here the model tells you when the universe collapses and how it collapses." For now, the study presents one possible future for the cosmos rather than a settled prediction. Whether the universe ultimately ends in a Big Crunch, expands forever, or follows another path entirely remains an open question that future observations will help answer. Source: Cornell University, The Conversation This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • If you look around on Amazon, some of these are available for $9
    • I’m still using an Xbox One S, so time for an upgrade to play this but as much as I hate Sony, I think I’ll get the ps5 pro
    • I bought this game. Played it for an hour, and then got a refund from Steam. Not a fun game at all.
    • Nothing Ear buds with active noise cancellation are at their lowest price ever with 51% off by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the Nothing Ear wireless earbuds at their lowest price ever with 51% off limited prime deal. The earbuds feature an 11mm dynamic drivers with a ceramic diaphragm, and support high-resolution audio codecs including AAC, SBC, LDAC, and LHDC 5.0. They support active noise cancellation of up to 45dB across a frequency range of up to 5000Hz, and include a smart ANC algorithm, adaptive noise cancellation, and a transparency mode that allows surrounding sounds to be heard when needed. Connectivity is provided via Bluetooth 5.3, with support for multiple profiles including HFP, A2DP, AVRCP, and others. The earbuds also support dual connection, allowing them to be paired with two devices at the same time. Additional features include IP54 water and dust resistance for the earbuds and IP55 for the charging case, in-ear detection, pinch controls, low-latency mode, Google Fast Pair, Microsoft Swift Pair, and a three-microphone system per earbud for clearer voice calls. The Nothing X app, available on Android and iOS, provides access to custom EQ settings, bass enhancement, personal sound profiles, ear tip fit testing, firmware updates, customisable controls, dual-device management, and a find-my-earbuds feature. In terms of battery performance, each earbud has a 46mAh battery and the charging case has a 500mAh capacity. With active noise cancellation (ANC) turned off, the earbuds should offer up to 8.5 hours of playback on a single charge and up to 40.5 hours in total with the charging case. With ANC enabled, playback should last up to 5.2 hours on the earbuds and up to 24 hours with the case. For calls, talk time should reach up to 5 hours on the earbuds and 23 hours with the case when ANC is off, while ANC on should provide up to 4 hours on the earbuds and 18 hours with the case. Finally, fast charging should deliver up to 10 hours of playback from 10 minutes of charging when ANC is disabled. Nothing Ear Wireless Earbuds Bluetooth: $73.15 (Amazon US) - 51% off Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      572
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      173
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      73
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!