Remember When Facebook Wanted Your Phone Number? It's Using It To Sell


Recommended Posts

Since about September, Facebook has offered its advertisers a powerful new way to track its users as they surf the Web: It's called "phone number retargeting." (The move comes separately to Facebook's effort earlier this year to collect its users' mobile phone numbers to prevent security breaches.)

More recently, according to AdExchanger, Facebook has also developed a new "conversion pixel" ? basically a type of tracking device ? within ads displayed on Facebook.

The combination of phone retargeting and conversion pixels theoretically allows advertisers to target you directly with ads and then measure exactly how you respond to them, whether by clicking, ignoring, or buying something from the advertiser's site. The process is anonymous, in that advertisers can't identify you by name. They do know, however, that they're targeting you based on your phone number.

Some advertisers have been doing this kind of thing on other websites for years. But most Facebook users don't know it's going on within Facebook.

The primary reason Facebook prompts users for a mobile phone number is to prevent account hacking. Earlier this year, Facebook began asking every user for a phone number for "security" purposes. Here's what Facebook says about that:

facebook-phone.jpg

Those numbers, it turns out, are NOT being sold to advertisers.*

Rather, Facebook also collects users' phone numbers when they are entered in other parts of a users' account information. Those numbers are then made available to advertisers as part of its new Custom Audience targeting product. "Audiences can be defined by either user email address, Facebook UIDs, or user phone numbers," the product states.

Here's how it works: Let's say you are a member of your local gym. You probably gave the gym your phone number. But then you let your membership lapse, and now the gym wants to persuade you to come back. The gym can cross-reference its list of members' phone numbers with users' phone numbers on Facebook, and serve an ad on the page of any user with a matching number. Suddenly, you're seeing ads that say, "Get 10% off if you rejoin your local gym!"

Advertisers can combine such a campaign with ads that carry a conversion pixel, which will enable a "cookie" to track what you do so that the gym can see how successful its campaign was.

There's a level of privacy built in to the system: Although your phone number will be targeted by ads, the number will be "hashed," meaning that the system disguises it by replacing it with random code, making you anonymous. So the gym might target 100 phone numbers, but it won't know which of those specific people actually responded to the ad (until they pay for a membership online, of course). All the gym will know is that a certain number responded to the ad, and that those users must have been on the original phone list.

*Correction: This item originally said, incorrectly, that security phone numbers were used for advertiser retargeting. The company tells us that these numbers are kept separate and NOT used for that purpose.

http://www.businessinsider.com/facebook-phone-number-security-being-sold-to-advertisers-2012-11

So, Facebook are doing nothing wrong and are trying new ways to help them survive and continue offering us a great product? Thanks for letting us know :) I knew that anyway, as I closely follow Facebook news, but it's good that more people are being informed that Facebook aren't actually doing anything wrong with their mobile numbers.

Not surprised.. same reason I won't give Yahoo Mail or GMail my phone number "for security purposes"

You missed the part where it says:

*Correction: This item originally said, incorrectly, that security phone numbers were used for advertiser retargeting. The company tells us that these numbers are kept separate and NOT used for that purpose.

Numbers given to them for security purposes are not handed out...this only happens if you have the number listed on there for general purposes.

I love this, people want a free service and then whine that the said company is using the demographic details they have to target ads. Honestly, I swear people are f-cking clueless as to how such services are free in the first place - as if some eccentric billionaire is bank rolling Facebook for the 'good of humanity' or something.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Didn’t Dbrand once complain that Casetify was ripping off their designs a well? seems pretty bad of them to try and get around Valve’s copyright this way with that in mind.
    • Dbrand thought they could get away with this Steam Machine case, Valve disagreed by David Uzondu Image via Dbrand Dbrand has cancelled its highly anticipated Companion Cube enclosure for the Valve Steam Machine, which it teased back in November of last year with a concept render and sign-up page, because it did not ask Valve for permission first before manufacturing the case. According to Dbrand, it took the "backwards approach" of building the product first before asking for permission from the copyright holder. Seven months of work went into the project, requiring over a thousand engineering hours from the design team. Workers developed forty-four sets of injection molding tools, making a unique mold for each sub-component of the crate. When the Companion Cube went live on Monday last week, it, according to Dbrand, quickly became the second-fastest-selling product in the company's fifteen-year history, racking up orders for hundreds of thousands of units. Customers eagerly bought the $129.95 deluxe edition or the bare-bones $99.95 version, which the manufacturer cheekily branded as the "Poverty Cube". It was around this time that the legal eagles at Valve descended on the accessory maker with a formal demand. The developer pointed out that the iconic block design remains protected intellectual property from the game Portal, so unlicensed sales had to stop. Dbrand said that all its pleas to salvage the project with the Valve team, including proposals to run a properly licensed release under official terms "with their blessing", fell on deaf ears, so it had no choice but to obey and remove every trace of the product from the internet. If you bought the enclosure, the company said that banks will process your refund by the end of this week, but if it still hasn't arrived in your account by then, you should not hesitate to contact support. The Steam Machine itself is a high-performance console that Valve designed directly to bring PC gaming into the living room. It was announced on 12th November 2025 (the same day Dbrand announced the Cube) and runs on the Linux-based SteamOS, the same OS that powers the Steam Deck. As for the price, due to the shortage of memory and storage chips, the hardware cost landed much higher than people were expecting, starting at $1,049 for the 512 model (without a controller) or $1,128 with the new gamepad. The premium 2 TB model pushes those prices even higher, selling at $1,349 for the standalone console and hitting $1,428 if you want the bundle.
    • It's listed #399.99 on Amazon, per your link. It's not $299.99.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Apprentice
      jahara21 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      534
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      264
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      97
    5. 5
      macoman
      58
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!