Windows Blue is Microsoft's future low-cost OS with yearly updates


Recommended Posts

Windows Blue is Microsoft's future low-cost OS with yearly updates

Microsoft is busy preparing its next-generation Windows client, shortly after shipping Windows 8 in October. The Verge has learned from several sources familiar with Microsoft?s plans that the company is planning to standardize on an approach, codenamed Blue, across Windows and Windows Phone in an effort to provide more regular updates to consumers.

The new update on the Windows side, due in mid-2013, will include UI changes and alterations to the entire platform and pricing. We?re told that Microsoft is aiming to make Windows Blue the next OS that everyone installs. The approach is simple, Microsoft will price its next Windows release at a low cost or even free to ensure users upgrade. Once Windows Blue is released, the Windows SDK will be updated to support the new release and Microsoft will stop accepting apps that are built for Windows 8, pushing developers to create apps for Blue.

We understand that you will need a genuine copy of Windows to upgrade to Windows Blue. Built-in apps and the Windows Store will cease functioning if a copy is upgraded that is pirated. Sources tell us that Microsoft will likely keep the Windows 8 name for the foreseeable future, despite the Windows Blue update. A big part of Windows Blue is the push towards yearly updates for Microsoft?s OS. Microsoft will kick off an annual upgrade cycle for Windows that is designed to make it more competitive against rival platforms from Apple and Google.

We reached out to Microsoft for comment, however a company spokesperson refused to discuss Windows Blue.

Source: The Verge

what? surely this date is wrong. they are spending all this time and money to market Windows 8 and it will be replaced and then unsupported from an apps standpoint in 6 months?

Edit: no source for this info either.

What I think the article is trying to say is they are going to start doing point releases like Windows 8.1, 8.2, 8.3, etc. Every few years they will do the major OS update like Windows 9. Rather than waiting 3 years for feature changes, they are going to do these point releases. Once a new point release is out though, you can't develop for an older version. Basically you have to develop against the latest SDK and that is it.

No surprises there, they had stuff like this planned post-Windows XP, codenamed Blackcomb which was supposed to be a modular OS that you could purchase subscriptions to programs like office, etc.. before they scrapped it and went with Longhorn (Vista)

  • Like 1

You know we are approaching the end of the "personal" computing when news outlets start to refer to Windows as the " next-generation Windows client". At this point, I'm looking forward to use a more mature ReactOS project and a DOSBox build capable of running the older (pre-NT) Windows version with ease.

You know we are approaching the end of the "personal" computing when news outlets start to refer to Windows as the " next-generation Windows client". At this point, I'm looking forward to use a more mature ReactOS project and a DOSBox build capable of running the older (pre-NT) Windows version with ease.

Why stop there when you could go all the way back to using an abacus and a slide-rule? Your posts are getting more and more ridiculous.

You know we are approaching the end of the "personal" computing when news outlets start to refer to Windows as the " next-generation Windows client". At this point, I'm looking forward to use a more mature ReactOS project and a DOSBox build capable of running the older (pre-NT) Windows version with ease.

Just give me a Chromebook and I'm good to go.

You know we are approaching the end of the "personal" computing when news outlets start to refer to Windows as the " next-generation Windows client". At this point, I'm looking forward to use a more mature ReactOS project and a DOSBox build capable of running the older (pre-NT) Windows version with ease.

Why are you even a reporter at a tech site, it seems you hate everything that's newer then the year 2000

You should find something better to do, because trolling these forums is getting boring for all of us!

  • Like 2

So how do they make any profit by giving away their OS?

Metro. Why do you think it's a closed ecosystem?

To ensure they get money from every piece of software anyone uses.

The potential revenue from getting 20-30% for every single software anyone buys, plus advertising built into the platform plus native tie-in's to all of Microsoft's other platforms (Music, Xbox etc etc. to help ensure people go there first for all of their games, music, videos etc.).

It's effectively subsidizing the operating system through the software. Not radically dissimilar to how smart phones are subsidized by the contracted plans.

As long as people use Metro you can ensure they have to go through you for anything they want to buy, and you have complete control over what anyone can do on the OS. No software runs you don't explicitly approve of. Radically decreased piracy.

The potential profit margins there will vastly exceed anything OS licensing has ever brought in the past.

Apple has succeeded doing the exact same thing for years.

The downside to this is users that use the desktop which remains an open uncontrolled platform with no service tie-ins, no advertising, purchases from anywhere. That'll kill profits, but as long as they can get a sufficiently large number of people to primarily use Metro it'll work out. Moving more traditional desktop functionality like explorer/file browser to Metro and off the desktop will help there.

Even if some people primarily use the desktop it's not crippling, Android is an open OS too but they survive quite giving the OS out free and subsidizing it via software through Google Play... because most people don't use the open aspects and don't get software from anyone except Google even if they can so the lost revenue from those few that don't partake in GooglePlay or Google's various other services are covered by the majority who do.

I suppose removing the desktop obviates this issue, but that's obviously not viable for the foreseeable future.

In any case, OS licensing is a pittance compared to other new revenue sources through the OS.

If higher windows costs prevents people from buying and using Windows 8, that means fewer people in Metro. And anything that prevents people from accessing Metro is costing them money, as the alternative is the desktop on Win7.... which benefits Microsoft not at all, there is no profit margins from people using the desktop. Or competing platforms, be it Linux, iOS/OSX, Android.

They NEED and smartly are ensuring that absolutely everyone can get onto Windows 8 and Metro. As long as they have that then they can work on converting people to using Metro itself rather then the desktop and driving revenue from the new revenue streams therein.

Why are you even a reporter at a tech site, it seems you hate everything that's newer then the year 2000

You should find something better to do, because trolling these forums is getting boring for all of us!

I've never even seem him write any articles on the front page or neogamr, and i've went searching through the articles with no success 0_o

I've never even seem him write any articles on the front page or neogamr, and i've went searching through the articles with no success 0_o

didn't see one either but he has the title of reporter so I assume he must have written something

I just find it very weird that somebody with the title of reporter really seems to hate all new tech

They're basically shooting themselves in the foot, going out of their release cycle would imply a lesser adoption of the OS especially when it comes to businesses.

I'm not sure that i agree with you yowanvista, maybe a faster release cycle will result in a faster adoption rate for larger corporations. They'll still be behind but it will eliminate the 10 year wait from going XP > 7

I'm not sure that i agree with you yowanvista, maybe a faster release cycle will result in a faster adoption rate for larger corporations. They'll still be behind but it will eliminate the 10 year wait from going XP > 7

Could be, in some cases but a lot of large enterprises are still using XP (and even Windows 2000). Some are just starting to test/prepare their software for a Windows 7 deployment. I really don't see why they would jump on Windows 8 atm given that they'd probably have to run a whole bunch of training sessions for their employees, the learning curve is quite steep from Windows 7 > Windows 8 and frankly speaking Metro UI/touchscreen stuff doesn't really find its place on buisiness PC. The average joe may love the new concept but enterprises are rather reluctant to even consider deploying Windows 8.

You know we are approaching the end of the "personal" computing when news outlets start to refer to Windows as the " next-generation Windows client".

Windows has always been a client OS, dude. Not sure what you mean by that.

At this point, I'm looking forward to use a more mature ReactOS project and a DOSBox build capable of running the older (pre-NT) Windows version with ease.

You do that. Tell 1995 I said hello.

  • Like 2

I'm not sure that i agree with you yowanvista, maybe a faster release cycle will result in a faster adoption rate for larger corporations. They'll still be behind but it will eliminate the 10 year wait from going XP > 7

There might be some truth in that, too. Somewhere in there Microsoft is going to have to release an enterprise version, though.

@yowanvista - I completely agree. i've come from a large enterprise where they only just started rolling out Windows 7 and its still in early phases so i know exactly what your saying. Corporate HQ in the US has moved over to 7 as far as i understand but this particular Australian arm (~4500) employees are still predominantly XP due to incompatibilities with current systems.

@Growled - No doubt about it an enterprise friendly edition will need to come.

This is imho BUT.. I can tell you right now a "metro" version of an Outbound dialler for a call center/collections business would be AWESOME. These are traditionally a crappy GUI that pulls info from a t system like visionplus or cardpac to make things easier/quicker for agents. With yearly updates and a leaner release cycle I think microsoft might be able to slowly sway larger corps over by addressing there needs.

Barring enthusiasts, People will learn what they need to know in order to do their role i don't think it is that much of a big deal.

There might be some truth in that, too. Somewhere in there Microsoft is going to have to release an enterprise version, though.

Yeah, I could see them doing what, for instance, Ubuntu (and a lot of Linux distros) does - have the consumer releases that come out relatively often (once or twice a year), and then have long-term support releases that are supported for 5 years so that large corporations, universities, etc. don't have to do a massive computer update every six months.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
    • Did you see their FAQ, its quite good. Have a look in the Advanced section. https://delta.chat/en/help
    • Just install Linux Mint that is a real blessing and many times cheaper because you can continue using your old Windows computer/laptop with the latest Linux updates.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      502
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!