18 posts in this topic

Posted

The Pentagon plans to bring warfare into the 22nd century, creating a new system to "map" the digital battlefield of cyberspace, defining a playbook for deploying cyberweapons and designating a management facility in Arlington, Va. to bring it all together.

It

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

virtual saber rattling..... really?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Didn't the US at one point, want to physically bomb the locations of people who were engaged in cyber war?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

They want to bring it ~987 years into the future?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Maybe less people will get killed when we bomb someone's web site.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

But what's the use in this really? Is it going to stop world-wide terrorism? Can it stop countries from sending in troops? Look I'm a retired/disabled Marine, so I just don't understand how any of this could stop anything. I'm all for people not dieing. But someone explain to me how this would prevent anything physical from happening.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

But what's the use in this really? Is it going to stop world-wide terrorism? Can it stop countries from sending in troops? Look I'm a retired/disabled Marine, so I just don't understand how any of this could stop anything. I'm all for people not dieing. But someone explain to me how this would prevent anything physical from happening.

It won't but it keeps some geek in military intelligence a job because it sounds good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

the internet is the first place in history where your average teenager has the resources to match or even outmaneuver the US government. and that's why all the governments are so afraid of it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

The internet is used for many things it shouldn't be used for, e.g. storing plans for the F22 fighter on an internet facing server. Why? Because the internet is a hell of a lot cheaper than dedicated single links to places and can sustain points of failure and reroute them plus has the added bonus of searching the internet at the same time as well.

As the US is in some serious debt, it'd make sense to use the internet rather than dedicated lines but to do that they've got to secure their systems (lol, will never happen) and retaliate if their systems get attacked, such as releasing stuxnet onto iran to stop their nuclear program.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

3kRoW.jpg

Nearly every idea of military defense, pre-emptive strike or retaliation is fine and awesome, until very soon it becomes clear that it can and will only be used for offensive.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Maybe less people will get killed when we bomb someone's web site.

No, more people would die. For example you could take out the electricity in the middle of winter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

It won't but it keeps some geek in military intelligence a job because it sounds good.

Thanx Growled. I should have known.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

You could cripple an economy and potentially disrupt utility companies causing loss of power, water or internet. Or even bring down factories that the country is reliant on.

I thought of that too, but any half-way smart country will keep the Power plants on a isolated computer system -- not connected to the regular Internet.

Maybe you could lock up the banking systems.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I thought of that too, but any half-way smart country will keep the Power plants on a isolated computer system -- not connected to the regular Internet.

Maybe you could lock up the banking systems.

I think you would be surprised. They wouldn't really even need to be directly connected to the internet in order to be susceptible, remember stuxnet? Also, like you said the banking industry is sitting pretty open. State secrets could be hacked into, as well as trade secrets for any larger companies. Government officials could be brought down due to scandals due to leaked emails.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

If things like were easily done I figure the terrorists would have done it already.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.