35 replies to this topic

[+Phouchg]

title groc
.model small
.stack 100h

.data
eggs dw baadh
milk dw f00dh
bag dw d00dh

.code
.486

start:
mov ax, [eggs]
cmp ax, 0
jz noeggs
mov cx, 6
jmp initbuy
noeggs:
mov cx, 2

initbuy:
xor ax, ax
buy:
add ax, 1
mov edx, [milk + ax * 4]
mov [bag + ax * 4], edx
cmp ax, cx
jne buy
endbuy:

mov ax, 4c00h
int 21h
end start

And, before anyone points out, yes. I don't know shhh about x86 assembly (contrary to, for example, the post above), but, arguably, it still looks cool and I had to pretend I'm smart

[Ice_Blue]

Hum, on 02 December 2012 - 00:18, said:

Yep -- posted back in June:

http://www.neowin.ne...g-a-programmer/

I just had to be a little smart alec

Thanks. I kind of figured it, but maybe I didn't search hard enough.

[Calum]

Threads merged

Ice_Blue, on 02 December 2012 - 00:32, said:

Thanks. I kind of figured it, but maybe I didn't search hard enough.

It's hard to find such a topic when it doesn't have an obvious title (like your one did, which is why I kept this title in the merged thread)

[Ice_Blue]

Calum, on 02 December 2012 - 00:52, said:

Threads merged


It's hard to find such a topic when it doesn't have an obvious title (like your one did, which is why I kept this title in the merged thread)

Thanks, Calum.

[+scumdogmillionaire]

simplezz, on 05 June 2012 - 17:18, said:

I like the ternary operator version as well:

int
get_milk()
{
	return ( shop_has_eggs() ) ? 6 : 1;
}

+1 that's how I'd write it

[Dushmany]

lol