Recommended Posts

An AutoZone worker who stopped an armed robbery by retrieving a weapon from his truck said he was fired by the company for violating their gun policy.

Devin McClean and his store manager were about to close the AutoZone in York County, Va. when a gunman barged into the store.

?He pulled a gun from his waist band and demanded me and my manager go back into the office,? McClean said.

At some point, McClean was left in a restroom while the gunman made the manager open the store safe. That?s when McClean, a 23-year-old Air Force veteran, bolted through a side door and ran to his truck.

He returned through the front door holding a Glock 40 ? pointed directly at the masked robber.

?I told him to freeze and to drop his weapon,? McClean told Fox News.

Instead, the robber took off ? last seen running down the street from the store.

?I watched him run down the street,? he said. ?I came back inside and made sure my manager was okay and he called the police.?

The York County Sheriff?s Dept. believes the bandit is responsible for as many as 30 robberies across the region.

?One of the officers asked why I didn?t shoot the robber,? McClean said.

Sheriff J.D. Diggs told Fox News he considers McClean to be a hero.

?He did a very brave thing,? the sheriff said. ?He put himself in jeopardy in an attempt to make sure his friend was safe. He did a very brave thing.?

The part-time worker?s manager was especially thankful and credited McClean with saving his life.

But two days after the robbery ? and just a week before Thanksgiving ? McClean was fired.

Television station WTKR reported that McClean violated corporate policy by leaving the store and returning with a weapon.

The station spoke to a representative from the company?s corporate office who said they had a ?zero tolerance policy for employees having weapons inside the store.?

An AutoZone spokesman told Fox News they will not discuss the matter.

?It was a surprise to me,? McClean said. ?I did the right thing. I saved the company $2,000. I saved one of their manager?s lives ? and you?re letting me go? It was a slap in the face.?

McClean said the firing came at a difficult time. He?s about to be a first-time father.

?We?re having a little boy,? he said. ?I remember when the guy came in with that gun. My initial thought was I want to make it home to my family. I want to have the opportunity to meet my son and for my son to meet his dad. And for someone to come in and shove a gun in your face??

So why not just keep running? Why go back inside the store ? and risk your own life?

?I regard them as my family,? McClean said of his co-workers. ?You?re not going to leave your brother or sister behind.?

It?s a lesson he learned in the Air Force.

?Never leave a man behind,? he said. ?I?m not going to leave my brother in a room with a guy with a gun ? that?s threatening his life.?

In spite of losing his job, McClean said his actions would be the same if it happened again.

?I wouldn?t change anything,? he said.

The sheriff said he was disappointed to hear that McClean lost his job on account of stopping the robbery.

?That?s certainly unfortunate,? he said. ?They should be doing something to reward that young man instead of firing him.?

Sheriff Diggs said AutoZone has also sent an unintended message to the community.

?The company has now sent a message to every would-be robber out there ? ?Hey we?re open for business and unarmed. Come on in and take our money,?? he said.

Meanwhile, the backlash against AutoZone is spreading. Customers have launched a boycott against the company on Facebook and a petition has been started urging them to rehire McClean.

?There?s a Pep Boys right around the corner,? one irate customer wrote on Facebook.

source

*Sigh* more clever coporate thinking...you seem to lose more common sense the higher up the ladder you get...

This guy saved them money and saved a man's life, and his reward is to be fired? People wonder why other people don't step forwards these days, it's because of stuff like this happening!

  • Like 3

pretty much a lose lose situation for the guy

either he came back in with the gun to protect his friend and get fired (which is what happened)

or he doesn't and drives away and gets considered a coward that only thinks about saving himself (whether he calls the police or not)

AutoZone should be ashamed of themselves, rules like that need to have some kind of exception for that kind of situation

You'd think by now that this whole "zero tolerance" nonsense is just that nonsense and just gives the company or organization an excuse to be lazy and immoral, especially since these policies have been proven to be useless to begin with

pretty much a lose lose situation for the guy

either he came back in with the gun to protect his friend and get fired (which is what happened)

or he doesn't and drives away and gets considered a coward that only thinks about saving himself (whether he calls the police or not)

AutoZone should be ashamed of themselves, rules like that need to have some kind of exception for that kind of situation

Yes their policies are terrible--

I myself fell victim to this circumstance...

I was feeling ill already worked my shift .... Someone didn't show up... they asked me to work until they found a replacement...four hours later they didn't.. I began to cough up blood (found out I had double pneumonia ... things were slow so I said to the manager I needed to go to the hospital... he said NO I could not go... I started feeling dizzy... so I asked again to go... he said No... I called the district manager-- he said that I should go to the hospital... So I punched out... went to the Hospital and was in the hospital for four weeks...

When I got back..

I was told that I had quit because I clocked out before my scheduled time even though I had the approval of my district manager. To make matters worse is that I had already worked my 8 hours that were scheduled, which to me didn't make sense... clocking out when I had already worked what I was scheduled.When I confronted the district manager about this I was told... Well that is the company policy. I had worked for them for 3 years.

That and four years later I applied at a different location and was told once I quit that I can no longer work for the corporation.

So this does not surprise me at all.

Yes their policies are terrible--

I myself fell victim to this circumstance...

I was feeling ill already worked my shift .... Someone didn't show up... they asked me to work until they found a replacement...four hours later they didn't.. I began to cough up blood (found out I had double pneumonia ... things were slow so I said to the manager I needed to go to the hospital... he said NO I could not go... I started feeling dizzy... so I asked again to go... he said No... I called the district manager-- he said that I should go to the hospital... So I punched out... went to the Hospital and was in the hospital for four weeks...

When I got back..

I was told that I had quit because I clocked out before my appointed time even though I had the approval of my district manager. When I confronted the district manager about this I was told... Well that is the company policy. I had worked for them for 3 years.

So this does not surprise me at all.

especially in your case i would have taken them to court sense you had gotten approval and it literally was a health emergency

I hope this guys lands on his feet soon. I'm sure he's a local hero who won't have a problem getting another job.

And with that, I will never go to Auto Zone again. Congratulations AutoZone execs, this guy may have saved you $2000; but now you have lost and will lose way more than that.

especially in your case i would have taken them to court sense you had gotten approval and it literally was a health emergency

When he was confronted-- he said ...

"I said that If I were you I would go to the hospital, but I didn't approve you clocking out."

"If you had just left and not clocked out the company policy would not have been able to been enforced."

"You should have called an ambulance to come get you then that would have fallen under the emergency leave time."

I didn't see a reason to call an ambulance since I was less than 3 blocks from the Hospital... where I collapsed in the ER.

When he was confronted-- he said ...

"I said that If I were you I would go to the hospital, but I didn't approve you clocking out."

"If you had just left and not clocked out the company policy would not have been able to been enforced."

"You should have called an ambulance to come get you then that would have fallen under the emergency leave time."

I didn't see a reason to call an ambulance since I was less than 3 blocks from the Hospital... where I collapsed in the ER.

still sounds full of crap to me and i bet you'd still have a winning case

I'm running out of Auto shops to go to, between this and Pep Boys totally disrespecting Veterans over and over again, I have been releagated to any Mom and Pop type place if there's any left or Walmart

I'm running out of Auto shops to go to, between this and Pep Boys totally disrespecting Veterans over and over again, I have been releagated to any Mom and Pop type place if there's any left or Walmart

I hear they have a fine selection of Little Trees and Yosemite Sam floor mats!

  • Like 2

Robberies and theft are a fine line in retail. In the case of robberies, we were told to comply with their demands, no questions asked. With theft, we were told never to approach or chase the suspect, but to report it to your higher up.

Is it better to just let them take the money and leave? His manager?s life could have been in more danger in a shootout between the two men or the robber could have grabbed the manager as a hostage to make sure he gets out. Companies have these rules so people wont sue them because a employee decided to be a hero and it didn't work out so great and a customer died. Instead of just letting the robber take the money and leave the store with a weapon you now have him sticking around longer.

Is it better to just let them take the money and leave?

99% of the time yes. That's why companies have a do as the thieves ask policy.

This said it's definately not a reason to fire someone. I mean it's a case by case. He felt it was safer to confront the armed thief and nobody got injured. He was there, the guy who fired him was not.

BTW props to him for not shooting someone running away. Finally a guy who have balls between the legs.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
    • Did you see their FAQ, its quite good. Have a look in the Advanced section. https://delta.chat/en/help
    • Just install Linux Mint that is a real blessing and many times cheaper because you can continue using your old Windows computer/laptop with the latest Linux updates.
    • Interesting share -- however it does not make sense: Email messages get stored somewhere, so how is Delta Chat "based on email" and decentralized without actually storing anything? By Web3 standard practices, the various Relays would require dedicated storage to make messages available to the recipients (like a large series of message queue channels, akin to racks of traditional post office boxes)... and Contacts must be two-way confirmed in order for encryption keys to be exchanged (ostensibly every key-pair is uniquely bound between sender and recipient) and the Relays would preserve the public keys in order to facilitate message carriage... or every device stores all sorts of keys and contact info. All of this to say, decentralized messaging is like running Bluesky nodes except instead of discovering/browsing public feeds by various posters (at the given node) these Delta Chats would be relaying encrypted messages (via Relays) that only trusted recipients would have the appropriate decryption key (their own private key) to read it. But this doesn't solve the "it's like email" sales pitch. The only way it's like email is that there's encrypted binary stuff being transported from your app into the federated ether of Delta Chat Relays for others to decrypt (hopefully only the intended recipient)... but outside of this federated relays framework, it is absolutely nothing like email.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      228
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      161
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!