Welcome Guest! To access all forums & features, please register an account or sign-in. → Why register?



Where Is Windows 8.1?


75 replies to this topic * * - - - 4 votes

#31 .Neo

    Generic User

  • 16,993 posts
  • Joined: 14-September 05
  • Location: Amsterdam, NL
  • OS: OS X Mountain Lion
  • Phone: iPhone 5

Posted 10 December 2012 - 23:39

View PostDot Matrix, on 10 December 2012 - 23:37, said:

Consumers don't buy 27 inch monitors to begin with.
Except they do and it's not like 27-inch is the boundary where full-screen becomes useless.


#32 vetsanctified

    A promise to myself: to be harder, to not care, to be cool.

  • 19,921 posts
  • Joined: 29-November 01
  • Location: ΓΈ
  • OS: OS X 10.8.x
  • Phone: iPhone 5

Posted 10 December 2012 - 23:44

View PostJoshie, on 10 December 2012 - 23:38, said:

Mac OS's full screen mode has some shortcomings. In what seems like nothing more than a raging desire to be as unlike every other OS as possible, OS X full screen mode is roughly the same as running a game full screen (all elements of the desktop completely disappear). For people who just want to quickly and easily set an application to take up the maximum available space while allowing access to common OS visual elements, Mac OS didn't exactly deliver, and it really is on par with "tablet mode" as a result.

Not quite right. You can access OS X components in fullscreen just like you would on Windows 8: Either by mouse proximity to certain hotspots or by shortcuts.

Also, you are right that the feature must be coded into apps. Just like Metro.

#33 Dot Matrix

    Neowinian Wise One

  • 5,650 posts
  • Joined: 14-November 11
  • Location: USA
  • OS: Windows 8
  • Phone: Nokia Lumia 920

Posted 10 December 2012 - 23:46

View Post.Neo, on 10 December 2012 - 23:39, said:

Except they do and it's not like 27-inch is the boundary where full-screen becomes useless.

Excluding techies, no they don't. I myself, won't buy anything great than 22 inch screens. They're too expensive, and too large.

http://marketshare.h...3&qptimeframe=Y

#34 .Neo

    Generic User

  • 16,993 posts
  • Joined: 14-September 05
  • Location: Amsterdam, NL
  • OS: OS X Mountain Lion
  • Phone: iPhone 5

Posted 10 December 2012 - 23:53

View PostDot Matrix, on 10 December 2012 - 23:46, said:

Excluding techies, no they don't. I myself, won't buy anything great than 22 inch screens. They're too expensive, and too large.
Most people with the means will buy screens in excess of 23-inch. It's really that simple and something I see happening all the time. If your situation is different either by choice and/or financial restrictions that's fine too of course.

#35 Dot Matrix

    Neowinian Wise One

  • 5,650 posts
  • Joined: 14-November 11
  • Location: USA
  • OS: Windows 8
  • Phone: Nokia Lumia 920

Posted 10 December 2012 - 23:55

View Post.Neo, on 10 December 2012 - 23:53, said:

Most people with the means will buy screens in excess of 23-inch. It's really that simple and something I see happening all the time. If your situation is different that's fine too.

Marketshare indicators don't support your claims, though. In fact, most places don't even display monitors any bigger than 22 inches, and in all my years of supporting people, I have never seen anything bigger from the people/places I've supported. So, who exactly are snatching up these behemoths like you claim?

#36 Enron

    Windows for Workgroups

  • 4,746 posts
  • Joined: 30-May 11
  • OS: MS-DOS 6.22 & Windows 3.11
  • Phone: Nokia Lumia 900

Posted 11 December 2012 - 00:03

View Postxiphi, on 10 December 2012 - 17:14, said:

Dvorak. I stopped there.

I never liked him or his keyboards.

#37 Wyn6

    Resident Fanatic

  • 544 posts
  • Joined: 01-March 12
  • Location: Dallas

Posted 11 December 2012 - 00:06

View PostEnron, on 11 December 2012 - 00:03, said:

I never liked him or his keyboards.

Agreed. But, I must admit that his musical compositions are sublime.

#38 TPreston

    Resident Elite

  • 1,699 posts
  • Joined: 18-July 12
  • Location: Ireland
  • OS: Windows Embedded Standard 8 & Server 2012/08 Datacenter
  • Phone: Nokia Lumia 920

Posted 11 December 2012 - 00:06

Support for packaged applications or at least Microsoft packaged applications in WSUS is high on my wish list.

#39 cropcircles

    Resident Elite

  • 1,375 posts
  • Joined: 31-October 04

Posted 11 December 2012 - 00:18

View PostDot Matrix, on 10 December 2012 - 23:37, said:

Consumers don't buy 27 inch monitors to begin with.

I have a 27' monitor and use it allot for gaming. I get up real close to it and pretend I'm a kid again at the drive-in.

#40 .Neo

    Generic User

  • 16,993 posts
  • Joined: 14-September 05
  • Location: Amsterdam, NL
  • OS: OS X Mountain Lion
  • Phone: iPhone 5

Posted 11 December 2012 - 00:20

View PostDot Matrix, on 10 December 2012 - 23:55, said:

Marketshare indicators don't support your claims, though. In fact, most places don't even display monitors any bigger than 22 inches, and in all my years of supporting people, I have never seen anything bigger from the people/places I've supported. So, who exactly are snatching up these behemoths like you claim?
Obviously worldwide statistics will give you lower-res screens. Not to mention many people use laptops. I've been working for small IT support company in Amsterdam for four years now and I see 22/23-inch screens and up all the time in people's homes and at companies. The 21,5-inch iMac being the exception to the rule. Most really don't even bother with anything smaller. The last place I ran my internship, a large television network, all computers (both PC and Mac) were equipped with 21,5/22 to 30-inch screens. At college all computers, again both PC and Mac, are either 21,5-inch, 23-inch, 24-inch, 27-inch or 30-inch.

You always seem to have enormous difficulties with accepting views/experiences different from your own.

Anyway, here's a link to a popular Dutch computer store called MyCom. Notice how they only sell only two screens smaller than 21,5-inch? Both aren't being displayed in the actual MyCom stores anymore. I can assure you the situation isn't much different at most other computer stores.

#41 vetGrowled

    Resident Rockstar

  • 35,979 posts
  • Joined: 17-December 08
  • Location: USA

Posted 11 December 2012 - 00:22

View PostHum, on 10 December 2012 - 23:34, said:

^ Not a digital.

:p :p :p

#42 scaramonga

    ME!

  • 2,364 posts
  • Joined: 21-April 03
  • Location: Bonnie Scotland
  • OS: Windows 7 Ultimate x64

Posted 11 December 2012 - 00:23

View Postmrp04, on 10 December 2012 - 18:30, said:

I seem to be able to multi-task and use Windows 8 just like I used 7. All I need to do once I boot my computer is click the Desktop tile.

All I need to do once I boot my computer is nothing, as I'm already at the Desktop. (and without any third-party app helping me along) :)

#43 Reverend Spam

    Neowinian Senior

  • 3,841 posts
  • Joined: 16-April 05
  • Location: Providence, RI, US
  • OS: Windows 8
  • Phone: Droid Bionic

Posted 11 December 2012 - 00:26

The author of the article is in dreamland... :p

#44 DavidM

    Resident Elite

  • 1,711 posts
  • Joined: 25-January 04
  • Location: Arizona, USA

Posted 11 December 2012 - 00:27

View PostDot Matrix, on 10 December 2012 - 23:55, said:

Marketshare indicators don't support your claims, though. In fact, most places don't even display monitors any bigger than 22 inches, and in all my years of supporting people, I have never seen anything bigger from the people/places I've supported. So, who exactly are snatching up these behemoths like you claim?

What? Staples, Office Max and Office Depot - ALL have 23" monitors and above out on display. Heck, you can pick one up for under $150 on sale, that's what I paid for my 23".

I don't know where you shop, but if the big 3 office stores keep them in stock and on display, then you can bet every electronic big box store has them.

#45 Dot Matrix

    Neowinian Wise One

  • 5,650 posts
  • Joined: 14-November 11
  • Location: USA
  • OS: Windows 8
  • Phone: Nokia Lumia 920

Posted 11 December 2012 - 00:31

View PostDavidM, on 11 December 2012 - 00:27, said:

What? Staples, Office Max and Office Depot - ALL have 23" monitors and above out on display. Heck, you can pick one up for under $150 on sale, that's what I paid for my 23".

I don't know where you shop, but if the big 3 office stores keep them in stock and on display, then you can bet every electronic big box store has them.

23 inch monitors aren't the question here. The We're talking 27+. Dvorak wants to claim fullscreen "sucks" on 27+ inch monitors, but no consumer I know of owns a 27+ inch monitor. The most I see on sale, in store is 21, 22, and 23. The common one is 21.5 inches, and Windows 8 on those is nothing.