Android's on-device malware checker has poor detection rate of 15.32%


Recommended Posts

To quantify the effectiveness of this service, we leverage our prior Android Malware Genome Project and check whether the collected Android malware samples can be detected. We conducted our experiments on November 30, 2012, by using the same dataset of 1260 samples (belonging to 49 different families) that has been widely shared within the research community, including Google. Our study involves semi-automated installation of them on a few of latest Nexus 10 tablets (16GB) running Android 4.2 (build number:JOP40C). The detailed detection results are shown in Table 1. Overall, among these 1260 samples, 193 of them can be detected, indicating a low detection rate of 15.32%.

Link: http://www.cs.ncsu.edu/faculty/jiang/appverify/

I have found that most people that get infected with malware on Android devices are people who download every stupid little unknown app there is and put it on their phone without first checking the validity of its source.

  • Like 2

I`ll install just about any .apk I find floating around and have never ended up with any problems, all my accounts still belong to me and no-one has reported spam coming from my email addresses and I wouldn't be naive enough to do anything like banking on Android anyway (Tablet so no issues with premium rate numbers, I might be more careful if it was a phone)

Just make sure you read the permissions the app asks for before you install it, a prime example was a member posted his news feed app here the other day and when I read it wanted to send emails without the owner knowing, read personal data and basically have access to your entire personal life, I cancelled the install

I'm not much of an app downloader but many of my friends are and they've never reported any trouble. They are just lucky, I guess. I do have a cousin that seemingly got something but no one was ever sure.

I've downloaded tonnes of apps, for years and never came across anything slightly malicious. The most worst thing I've came across is an ad popup on the notification bar.

Imagine third party antivirus on your android? That's a bit embarrassing... I honestly wouldn't be surprised if one already exists. The operating system is bloated already as it is.

There exists three that I know of. Actually security experts say we should install antivirus on every platform.

Imagine third party antivirus on your android? That's a bit embarrassing... I honestly wouldn't be surprised if one already exists. The operating system is bloated already as it is.

How is that embarrising? apple's app store has had malware passed as official apps before too...

Imagine third party antivirus on your android?

There are five antivirus for Android as we speak. I have one of them installed. ESET Mobile Security.

Imagine third party antivirus on your android? That's a bit embarrassing... I honestly wouldn't be surprised if one already exists. The operating system is bloated already as it is.

there's been antivirus apps for android for over a year now, here's a list of them http://www.techsupportalert.com/content/best-free-antivirus-app-android.htm

There are lots of antivirus solutions for Android. Some common names include ESET, Kaspersky, Avast, Norton, McAfee, AVG, Comodo, and Avira, and there are plenty of others. As for the practicality, I honestly have no idea. But I run Avast on my phone without any problems, and it has some nice anti-theft features as well.

The main problem is that one can get malware even while installing from Google Play. Malware in an .apk is understandable in such open platform.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yes, it was amusing at the time because even then dbrand was well known for stealing the designs of products from other companies. That’s what they do.
    • Didn’t Dbrand once complain that Casetify was ripping off their designs a well? seems pretty bad of them to try and get around Valve’s copyright this way with that in mind.
    • Dbrand thought they could get away with this Steam Machine case, Valve disagreed by David Uzondu Image via Dbrand Dbrand has cancelled its highly anticipated Companion Cube enclosure for the Valve Steam Machine, which it teased back in November of last year with a concept render and sign-up page, because it did not ask Valve for permission first before manufacturing the case. According to Dbrand, it took the "backwards approach" of building the product first before asking for permission from the copyright holder. Seven months of work went into the project, requiring over a thousand engineering hours from the design team. Workers developed forty-four sets of injection molding tools, making a unique mold for each sub-component of the crate. When the Companion Cube went live on Monday last week, it, according to Dbrand, quickly became the second-fastest-selling product in the company's fifteen-year history, racking up orders for hundreds of thousands of units. Customers eagerly bought the $129.95 deluxe edition or the bare-bones $99.95 version, which the manufacturer cheekily branded as the "Poverty Cube". It was around this time that the legal eagles at Valve descended on the accessory maker with a formal demand. The developer pointed out that the iconic block design remains protected intellectual property from the game Portal, so unlicensed sales had to stop. Dbrand said that all its pleas to salvage the project with the Valve team, including proposals to run a properly licensed release under official terms "with their blessing", fell on deaf ears, so it had no choice but to obey and remove every trace of the product from the internet. If you bought the enclosure, the company said that banks will process your refund by the end of this week, but if it still hasn't arrived in your account by then, you should not hesitate to contact support. The Steam Machine itself is a high-performance console that Valve designed directly to bring PC gaming into the living room. It was announced on 12th November 2025 (the same day Dbrand announced the Cube) and runs on the Linux-based SteamOS, the same OS that powers the Steam Deck. As for the price, due to the shortage of memory and storage chips, the hardware cost landed much higher than people were expecting, starting at $1,049 for the 512 model (without a controller) or $1,128 with the new gamepad. The premium 2 TB model pushes those prices even higher, selling at $1,349 for the standalone console and hitting $1,428 if you want the bundle.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Apprentice
      jahara21 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      534
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      265
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      97
    5. 5
      macoman
      58
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!