Recommended Posts

OK all you SIM's, wrap hour head around this. Seems connectable to the ideas about a holographic universe.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/12/121210132752.htm

Do We Live in a Computer Simulation Run by Our Descendants? Researchers Say Idea Can Be Tested

Dec. 10, 2012 ? A decade ago, a British philosopher put forth the notion that the universe we live in might in fact be a computer simulation run by our descendants. While that seems far-fetched, perhaps even incomprehensible, a team of physicists at the University of Washington has come up with a potential test to see if the idea holds water.

The concept that current humanity could possibly be living in a computer simulation comes from a 2003 paper published in Philosophical Quarterly by Nick Bostrom, a philosophy professor at the University of Oxford. In the paper, he argued that at least one of three possibilities is true:

? The human species is likely to go extinct before reaching a "posthuman" stage.

? Any posthuman civilization is very unlikely to run a significant number of simulations of its evolutionary history.

? We are almost certainly living in a computer simulation.

He also held that "the belief that there is a significant chance that we will one day become posthumans who run ancestor simulations is false, unless we are currently living in a simulation."

With current limitations and trends in computing, it will be decades before researchers will be able to run even primitive simulations of the universe. But the UW team has suggested tests that can be performed now, or in the near future, that are sensitive to constraints imposed on future simulations by limited resources.

Currently, supercomputers using a technique called lattice quantum chromodynamics and starting from the fundamental physical laws that govern the universe can simulate only a very small portion of the universe, on the scale of one 100-trillionth of a meter, a little larger than the nucleus of an atom, said Martin Savage, a UW physics professor.

Eventually, more powerful simulations will be able to model on the scale of a molecule, then a cell and even a human being. But it will take many generations of growth in computing power to be able to simulate a large enough chunk of the universe to understand the constraints on physical processes that would indicate we are living in a computer model.

However, Savage said, there are signatures of resource constraints in present-day simulations that are likely to exist as well in simulations in the distant future, including the imprint of an underlying lattice if one is used to model the space-time continuum.

The supercomputers performing lattice quantum chromodynamics calculations essentially divide space-time into a four-dimensional grid. That allows researchers to examine what is called the strong force, one of the four fundamental forces of nature and the one that binds subatomic particles called quarks and gluons together into neutrons and protons at the core of atoms.

"If you make the simulations big enough, something like our universe should emerge," Savage said. Then it would be a matter of looking for a "signature" in our universe that has an analog in the current small-scale simulations.

Savage and colleagues Silas Beane of the University of New Hampshire, who collaborated while at the UW's Institute for Nuclear Theory, and Zohreh Davoudi, a UW physics graduate student, suggest that the signature could show up as a limitation in the energy of cosmic rays.

In a paper they have posted on arXiv, an online archive for preprints of scientific papers in a number of fields, including physics, they say that the highest-energy cosmic rays would not travel along the edges of the lattice in the model but would travel diagonally, and they would not interact equally in all directions as they otherwise would be expected to do.

"This is the first testable signature of such an idea," Savage said.

If such a concept turned out to be reality, it would raise other possibilities as well. For example, Davoudi suggests that if our universe is a simulation, then those running it could be running other simulations as well, essentially creating other universes parallel to our own.

"Then the question is, 'Can you communicate with those other universes if they are running on the same platform?'" she said

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1125004-do-we-live-in-a-computer-simulation/
Share on other sites

For me the questions are: is it rather holographic projection of saved state with no chances for changing it? Or its "base program" allows intelligent species to live on their own? Does it fully mimic reality of their creators? Or it is just like in Minecraft - a random seed generated for fun or rather specimen sample with basic environment.

The Double-Slit Experiment

When a camera observed the electrons, they acted as particles. However, when the no equipment was used to observe the electrons, they acted as waves and particles simultaneously.

http://www.highexist...lit-experiment/

I watched the above a while ago, particles change behaviour when watched

The Double-Slit Experiment

When a camera observed the electrons, they acted as particles. However, when the no equipment was used to observe the electrons, they acted as waves and particles simultaneously.

http://www.highexist...lit-experiment/

I watched the above a while ago, particles change behaviour when watched

that's rather interesting

The Double-Slit Experiment

When a camera observed the electrons, they acted as particles. However, when the no equipment was used to observe the electrons, they acted as waves and particles simultaneously.

http://www.highexist...lit-experiment/

I watched the above a while ago, particles change behaviour when watched

this almost directly correlates to the research on superconductor fractals and their influence on predictable

constants through energy permutation for what is believed to define a set of "higer universal laws"

which in theory are what controls and influences all the other subordinate laws, principles, ordinances,

and rules that govern function and form in the universe

tl;dr

It is possible to influence matter with other matter to react in a predictable way other than we are aware of in our surroundings

:)

Sorry to burst your bubble but the double slit experiment is so misunderstood. The act of measurement affects the particles, it isn't the same as looking at them with your eyes...

And what is sight but the proccess of light refraction passing through a cornea lens which is then morphed by a liquid

(light manipulation by exposure to specific chemical components)

:rofl:

I don't think this is a simulation. The server hasn't crashed in billions of years and the amount of processing power needed to simulate my crazy cat just does not exist in any way, shape or form.

You're just unaware it crashed. Like when a game crashes and you resume from you last save. The in-game characters would have no idea a crash happened :shiftyninja:.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving for OpenAI by Pradeep Viswanathan Noam Shazeer is best known as one of the co-authors of the 2017 “Attention Is All You Need” paper, which introduced the Transformer architecture that now powers most large language models. He also worked on several major Google AI projects, including LaMDA, before leaving the company in 2021 to co-found Character.AI. He also authored the Sparsely-gated Mixture of Experts (2016) paper, which is popular among the AI community. After falling behind OpenAI and Anthropic a couple of years ago, Google brought Shazeer back in 2024 as part of a major deal with Character.AI. Through this deal, along with Noam, several other researchers returned to Google DeepMind. More recently, he was a vice president of engineering at Google and a technical co-lead for Gemini. Today, Noam Shazeer announced on X that he is leaving Google and joining OpenAI. In his post, Shazeer said it was a difficult decision to move on, adding that he was proud of the Google team and what it had built together. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman welcomed the move with a post of his own, saying Shazeer was one of the people he had most wanted to work with since OpenAI’s early days. Google has made strong progress with Gemini over the past year, closing the gap with OpenAI in several areas. But losing Noam Shazeer is a major talent setback for them, especially after bringing him back less than two years ago by spending a fortune. For OpenAI, the hire adds one of the industry’s most experienced language model researchers to a team that is already pushing ahead with ChatGPT, Codex, and its next generation of frontier models.
    • I'm lost too... what did you mean by your first comment then?
    • Couple years ago I got a brand new 4TB Samsung 990 Pro for $250 during Black Friday
    • Thanks
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Harris Gilbert earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Vincian earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      542
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      85
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      64
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!