Logitech Z623 vs Audio Engine A2


  

10 members have voted

  1. 1. Better speakers?

    • Logitech Z623
      6
    • AudioEngine A2
      4


Recommended Posts

I listened to those Logitech speakers a couple days ago at Staples. They actually had pretty good sound and good bass.

Not even close to my 3D soundbar and sub, but good for the low price I'd say, plus Logitech makes nice stuff.

The A2 and A5 far exceed typical "computer speakers" like what Logitech does, in sound quality at least. Of course 2" woofers won't beat a dedicated subwoofer in bass output, so it depends what type of listener you are. If it's fidelity you're after, A2, if it's power, Z623.

The A2 and A5 far exceed typical "computer speakers" like what Logitech does, in sound quality at least. Of course 2" woofers won't beat a dedicated subwoofer in bass output, so it depends what type of listener you are. If it's fidelity you're after, A2, if it's power, Z623.

well said

Logitech is known for bombastic bass, it's enjoyable if you are a gamer and like to "feel" explosions.

If you like to listen more seriously music the audioengine A2. Although the audioengine A5 is more recommended.

Take the audioengine A2 if you want to save space, otherwise you might enjoy bigger speakers (and eventually with a subwoofer).

I have also the altec lansing fx-6021 and I think I prefer them to the audio engine a2, but they take more space.

Also a warning regarding the audioengine a2: you have to position them properly in order to get best sound,

otherwise you might find them "fatiguing" (in you face bass).

I'd recommend the Logitech, purely because I have the Z3 - 2.1 speaker system, and had an arguement with a guy in My nearest Apple Store, who kept tyring to sell me the Bose Companion 2.1, My Z3 blew them out of the water in bass, tho the sound clarity wasn't as good, but then again, with how much the Bose were going to cost, I could have bought 4 sets of Z3's (at that time). Personally, unless you're a hardcore music fan, (by this I mean you REALLY Love your music, in which case, a good quality amplifier and a really decent set of speakers, I think TEAC does a really nice set that are small enough to be used next to a desktop monitor) you're not going to miss the sacrifice of finer sound for that price point.

by this I mean you REALLY Love your music

Yeah that'd be me. All I do is... look for, read about, download, and listen to music, non stop, 24/7.

I've been threw many stereos over the years, with some damn good speaker, and have had many types of computer speakers, and I'd say my LG 3D Soundbar/Wireless Sub, has got to be the best so far. The sound is incredible. Every note from every instrument is so clear and detailed, and the bass is absolutely phenomenal.

  • Like 1

I'd recommend the Logitech, purely because I have the Z3 - 2.1 speaker system, and had an arguement with a guy in My nearest Apple Store, who kept tyring to sell me the Bose Companion 2.1, My Z3 blew them out of the water in bass, tho the sound clarity wasn't as good, but then again, with how much the Bose were going to cost, I could have bought 4 sets of Z3's (at that time).

But Bose is regularly bashed by "so called" audiophiles. Some say BOSE is an acronym of "buy other sound equipment".

Bose is all about marketing, they repeat everywhere they are the best, and some believe it.

You might find more info at head-fi, here's a thread discussing about the Logitech z623.

http://www.head-fi.o...t-of-the-titans

Personally I'd buy neither of these speakers. If you have space on your desktop, just could buy for instance harmann soundsticks 2.1.

Logitech is just a mass market brand not very specialized for audio.

But Bose is regularly bashed by "so called" audiophiles. Some say BOSE is an acronym of "buy other sound equipment".

Bose is all about marketing, they repeat everywhere they are the best, and some believe it.

You might find more info at head-fi, here's a thread discussing about the Logitech z623.

http://www.head-fi.o...t-of-the-titans

Personally I'd buy neither of these speakers. If you have space on your desktop, just could buy for instance harmann soundsticks 2.1.

Logitech is just a mass market brand not very specialized for audio.

So why are you having a go at me about this? I'm not the one buying the speakers, I only gave a recommendation.

I don't hate Bose, it just happened that the 2.1 I was demonstrated wasn't good enough to justify the ?300 UK Price tag, when my Z3's were ?80ish UK at the time.

Also I happen to own a pair of B&W DM 604's for my living room, so I do know good sound when I hear it, although I do need to get another RB06 for them.

I don't hate Bose, it just happened that the 2.1 I was demonstrated wasn't good enough to justify the ?300 UK Price tag, when my Z3's were ?80ish UK at the time.

I meant Bose is often overpriced , so it's not surprising if you prefer a cheaper alternative. I also meant, Bose is not the audiophile reference it claims to be.

I meant Bose is often overpriced , so it's not surprising if you prefer a cheaper alternative. I also meant, Bose is not the audiophile reference it claims to be.

Oh ok, my misunderstanding, although the sound difference from my Z3 campared to the Bose was minimal, the Bose had a little more clarity, but again, the difference wasn't worth the extra ?220 ish difference.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Plans. Christ at least editorialise this tripe for what it is or put your own journalistic take on it.
    • If you have a TV in your living room, chances are you can probably just use the Steam Link app and play your huge PC in big picture mode, effectively giving you the Steam Machine experience to see if you'd actually like it. The good news is the Steam Machine can have it's drives upgraded. It has a USB-C 10Gbs port as well, so the 512GB drive could be quickly moved to an external enclosure and repurposed.
    • This machine could very well be a second gaming PC for their living room as a console experience. So we would have to assume their main PC exists as well; With that said, I have 10gb home network with a 2.5gigabit internet connection here so we tend to have more than enough speed to download games. However, we can't make use of the 10gb LAN using Steam's built in transfer tool because it always compresses transfers and that slows the transfer down to well below a standard gigabit port speeds, sometimes as slow as 200-300Mb/s transfers. While that's probably still faster than most internet connections anyway, if they'd fix the LAN transfer issue it'd be upto x5 faster even on a gigabit LAN, than simply dropping a 2.5gbe port on there with hopes of a few people having fast internet connections. There are solutions, work arounds, like using LANCache if you run a NAS... or simply copying the files over manually using a network share.
    • Samsung announces ultra-fast UFS 5.0 storage to supercharge mobile AI by Paul Hill Local AI models tend to run a lot more slowly than cloud services like Claude and Gemini; however, Samsung has just announced that it has developed its UFS 5.0 solution, which increases data transfer to speeds of 10.8GB/s, enabling faster storage and processing in mobile memory that has the potential to provide more optimal local AI experiences. Commenting on this development, Jangseok Choi, head of Memory Product Planning at Samsung Electronics, said: If you’ve tried local AI, you’ll know it can be quite slow, especially if using the larger parameter models. By developing this new solution, Samsung says that storage is evolving from just storing data to a core piece of infrastructure that supports AI computation, too. The Korean company said that UFS 5.0 integrates the latest embedded memory interface standard from JEDEC and achieves up to 10.8 gigabytes per second (GB/s) transfer speeds. Regarding write speeds, Samsung UFS 5.0 can reach 9.5 GB/s. Both the read and write speeds are twice as fast as those of the previous UFS 4.1 standard. Aside from being ideal for local AI, Samsung’s UFS 5.0 is more power efficient by 40% compared to UFS 4.1. Samsung achieved this by implementing innovations such as clock gating and multi-voltage technologies. UFS 5.0 is also ultra-compact at just 7.5mm x 13mm x 0.9mm; that is 16.7% smaller than UFS 4.1. The company said it will be bringing it to multiple devices in the future, including mobile, wearable, and extended reality.
    • A bit like the steamdeck, this probably isn't for you.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      496
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      209
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      99
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      86
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!