Recommended Posts

Big difference between a small animal and a small human. That bird should know better. Poopy diapers weigh a kid down!!

The bird scared the **** outta that kid. ;)

Also why do dumb asses run with their cameras pointed at the ground?

  • Like 2

Holy mother of ****!

That is one magnificent bird but damn if that happened to me as either the kid or the parents, i'd absolutely crap myself!

Im sure he was more worried about the kid that might have been hurt than getting a good camera shot of himself running to the kid.

Exactly.

The first thing i'd do would be drop the camera and run.

I don't see what I'm supposed to be looking at in the "Fake" video?

aha. There was a doll with red hair and blue outfit that was picked up by the bird and when the camera man ran to the toddler, the real toddler was taken out of the stroller who was wearing a red hood and blue outfit. Nicely done fake, I wonder how they knew the bird was going to go for the doll.

aha. There was a doll with red hair and blue outfit that was picked up by the bird and when the camera man ran to the toddler, the real toddler was taken out of the stroller who was wearing a red hood and blue outfit. Nicely done fake, I wonder how they knew the bird was going to go for the doll.

huh, interesting. Going to get their 15 minutes I suppose now...

aha. There was a doll with red hair and blue outfit that was picked up by the bird and when the camera man ran to the toddler, the real toddler was taken out of the stroller who was wearing a red hood and blue outfit. Nicely done fake, I wonder how they knew the bird was going to go for the doll.

No dolls. CGI. Notice the movement in the video I posted.

And these weird glitches in the matrix: http://i.imgur.com/kZg5S.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/7ygzr.jpg

Also hit the news: http://wtvr.com/2012...hes-kid-is-cgi/

edit: Damn you streetwolf for posting that link seconds earlier than me :)

Im sure he was more worried about the kid that might have been hurt than getting a good camera shot of himself running to the kid.

I know. Anyone would.

that was some cool **** anyway. That bird didn't quite expect the weight. When I saw the it swoop down I already knew what was up. Definitely not the bird with the kid in hand.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft's fast coding model MAI-Code-1-Flash comes to Copilot Business and Enterprise by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft’s recently announced MAI-Code-1-Flash model is now generally available to GitHub Copilot Business and Copilot Enterprise customers. With this support, organizations can have more centralized policy controls and billing while finally being able to use Microsoft’s lightweight, first-party coding model. According to GitHub’s announcement, Business and Enterprise plan administrators must enable the MAI-Code-1-Flash policy in Copilot settings before developers can access the model. Microsoft says that MAI-Code-1-Flash is for fast, iterative coding work rather than the most demanding architectural or debugging tasks. GitHub’s official model comparison page says that the model is great for "general-purpose coding and writing," while it excels at fast, accurate code completions and explanations Microsoft introduced MAI-Code-1-Flash on June 2 as part of a broader collection of internally developed MAI models. GitHub subsequently expanded support to Copilot CLI, the Copilot cloud agent, GitHub.com chat, GitHub Mobile, Visual Studio, JetBrains IDEs, Eclipse, and Xcode, but said support for managed Business and Enterprise customers was still on the way. In Microsoft’s own benchmark testing, MAI-Code-1-Flash scored 51.2% on SWE-Bench Pro, compared with 35.2% for Anthropic’s Claude Haiku 4.5. Microsoft also claimed that the model used up to 60% fewer tokens on SWE-Bench Verified. Do note that these are vendor-run results rather than independent measurements. The model is billed at provider list pricing under GitHub’s usage-based system. GitHub currently lists MAI-Code-1-Flash at $0.75 per million input tokens, $0.075 per million cached input tokens, and $4.50 per million output tokens. For organizations, the main incentive to use MAI-Code-1-Flash is likely to be efficiency rather than maximum capability. A smaller model that responds quickly and limits unnecessary output is quite useful for repetitive agent tasks at scale, especially after GitHub Copilot’s move toward usage-based billing. The "Flash" model is recommended for fast work and not necessarily for huge repositories with loads of context. It's better if teams compare their output with other larger models, especially if they're working on security-sensitive changes and complex, multi-file work.
    • yes AND no the "original" or plain/normal Optiplex 7010 won't be getting any more new firmware updates BUT the Optiplex SFF/SFF Plus {small form factor}, Micro/Micro Plus & Tower/Tower Plus 7010 editions DO get new updates such as this new one   and here are similar guides from the Dell web site for Dell systems: https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000390990/secure-boot-transition-faq https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000347876/microsoft-2011-secure-boot-certificate-expiration
    • AT&T has been spying on US citizens with the NSA for decades.. they just know how to keep it more under wraps.. the evil level is still there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      462
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      213
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!