Windows 8 Falls Behind Even the Maligned Vista


Recommended Posts

W8 being what is it, a fifth of the price of what W7 or Vista were? And it's still doing bad.

Don't blame this for not including christmas shopping.

It's not selling well because it's not selling well.

While it may well be usable with a mouse and keyboard, it was designed for touch.

Actually it was designed for both and studies have shown it to be more accurate when using it with a mouse/keyboard - http://blogs.msdn.com/b/b8/archive/2011/10/04/designing-the-start-screen.aspx

That link is a very good read if you would like to take the time to educate yourself on the what and why's of how the design was planned.

Personally, I hit WinKey, type what I want and get what I want.

E.g.

WinKey, type DNS, hit enter, I get a DNS console.

WinKey, type powershell ise, hit enter, I get a Powershell ISE.

WinKey, type steam, hit enter and I get my games.

It's fantastic.

Never before has Windows listened to me.

How people cannot want this? I don't know.

In other words, just like Vista and 7.

Actually it was designed for both and studies have shown it to be more accurate when using it with a mouse/keyboard - http://blogs.msdn.co...art-screen.aspx

That link is a very good read if you would like to take the time to educate yourself on the what and why's of how the design was planned.

Yes, sure, those involved in the development will surely have the courage of their convictions, but you can't seriously offer that up as proof of anything.

Personally, I hit WinKey, type what I want and get what I want.

WinKey, type DNS, hit enter, I get a DNS console.

WinKey, type powershell ise, hit enter, I get a Powershell ISE.

WinKey, type steam, hit enter and I get my games.

It's fantastic.

Never before has Windows listened to me.

How people cannot want this? I don't know.

The issue is that this was the same in 7, better in fact. In 7 you only had to type "powershell" and it would show PowerShell AND the ise, in 8, you must fully type "powershell ise" perfectly for it to be even an option. On top of that, in 7, the ise link was the actual program, in 8 its actually a PowerShell script that launches the ise, increasing startup time (not by much, but its noticeable).

Another fun example is Windows Remote Assistance. I use this a lot with my parents and in 7, I simply had them type "remote assistance" and it would show up as "Windows Remote Assistance", in 8, you can still type that, but now its hidden under "settings" (even though its technically an app) and its called "Invite someone you know to connect to your PC and help you, or help someone else". How does that make any sense?

I just don't understand how the awesome search in 7 is now terrible in 8. Example - 7 - start + "power options" + enter = Power Options vs 8 - start + "power options" + enter = nothing, I have to add two down keys and then hit enter now. Its annoying.

I'm all for progressing Windows to fit the new era of computing, but not when it comes with the price of a loss of functionality and ease of use.

Yes, sure, those involved in the development will surely have the courage of their convictions, but you can't seriously offer that up as proof of anything.

Well if you actually used it, you would see that not only does the start screen work better than the start menu. it actually works better with a mouse than with touch.

And since I use Win8 regularly and I've have tried it on touch devices, and have one available to me pretty much every day. and from reading your previous posts, you have never used win8, you have barely seen screenshots of it, most of your win8 claims are outright wrong.

The point however is that the UI was designed for both touch and mouse and works great on both.

HEck it's funny seeing self proclaimed power users saying it's unusable for power users, when it's power users who probably can make the most out of the start screen as a more powerful and faster and more efficient launcher. But that would require actually trying it and using it and admitting that they where wrong, something these people aren't very good at, especially the admitting they're wrong part.

  • Like 2

In other words, just like Vista and 7.

No, this version actually works and fetches what, not spend random amounts of time doing FA then return either the wrong thing or random library files.

The issue is that this was the same in 7, better in fact. In 7 you only had to type "powershell" and it would show PowerShell AND the ise, in 8, you must fully type "powershell ise" perfectly for it to be even an option.

And this is another example of someone who hasn't used 8, and comes with wild and outright wrong claims. another one of the popular win 8 myths. this one keeps being repetaed all over in various forms. and always completely wrong.

Touch & Mouse are pretty much the same thing in the Metro UI, except for the swipe from the side actions, what you do with the mouse, you would do with your finger, difference is, with the mouse, you don't need to move your arm / hand anywhere near as much

Another fun example is Windows Remote Assistance. I use this a lot with my parents and in 7, I simply had them type "remote assistance" and it would show up as "Windows Remote Assistance", in 8, you can still type that, but now its hidden under "settings" (even though its technically an app) and its called "Invite someone you know to connect to your PC and help you, or help someone else". How does that make any sense?

Think abotu it from your parents POV, which ones makes more sense, Remote assistance that could mean anything, in fact it sounds more like you are connecting to someone else, or the actual text that says you are inviting someone to help you.

And typing both remote, invite and any number of variations will give you the "invite someone..." option in the search list, so...

Touch & Mouse are pretty much the same thing in the Metro UI, except for the swipe from the side actions, what you do with the mouse, you would do with your finger, difference is, with the mouse, you don't need to move your arm / hand anywhere near as much

Right clicking is a lot better than the hold function with touch though. organizing is also a lot easier with mouse.

And this is another example of someone who hasn't used 8, and comes with wild and outright wrong claims. another one of the popular win 8 myths. this one keeps being repetaed all over in various forms. and always completely wrong.

Ya, I haven't used 8 at all. I've been running on all my computers since the CP. Even at work. :rolleyes:

I just tested my "outright wrong claim" too. Typing just "powershell" in start does not show the ISE. I have to type "powershell ise" for it to show up as a link to a powershell script that launches the ISE.

  • Like 1

Ya, I haven't used 8 at all. I've been running on all my computers since the CP. Even at work. :rolleyes:

I just tested my "outright wrong claim" too. Typing just "powershell" in start does not show the ISE. I have to type "powershell ise" for it to show up as a link to a powershell script that launches the ISE.

didn't even press 'w' yet.. nvm i see what you mean now.

JGkIF.png

No, this version actually works and fetches what, not spend random amounts of time doing FA then return either the wrong thing or random library files.

No, what you described is how Windows 7 search function works, and as LightEco has mentioned it doesn't even work as well in 8.

  • Like 1

Think abotu it from your parents POV, which ones makes more sense, Remote assistance that could mean anything, in fact it sounds more like you are connecting to someone else, or the actual text that says you are inviting someone to help you.

And typing both remote, invite and any number of variations will give you the "invite someone..." option in the search list, so...

When they have the Son on the phone and he says "open Remote Assistance", the non-retard would expect to click on something that says "Remote Assistance" and not some long rambling sentence.

Also, nice selective quote. What about his point on the Power Options applet?

  • Like 1

I just tested my "outright wrong claim" too. Typing just "powershell" in start does not show the ISE. I have to type "powershell ise" for it to show up as a link to a powershell script that launches the ISE.

That's because it isn't a shortcut, pin powershell ISE to your startmenu, then you can just do Winkey and type ISE and enter

didn't even press 'w' yet.

he's talking about powershell ISE not just powershell

didn't even press 'w' yet.

Thanks, just about to post that myself. As you can clearly see only PowerShell is shown, the PowerShell ISE is not an option. You need to fully type "powershell ise" for it to show that link.

That's because it isn't a shortcut, pin powershell ISE to your startmenu, then you can just do Winkey and type ISE and enter

You are correct, but why in 7 did it work just fine without needing to be pinned? Why the loss of functionality? I only nag on this because I use the ISE daily at work (I've since pinned it to my taskbar, but its the perfect example of a literal harder to use scenario)

Thanks, just about to post that myself. As you can clearly see only PowerShell is shown, the PowerShell ISE is not an option. You need to fully type "powershell ise" for it to show that link.

Does it show Powershell ISE by typing only 'ise' like it does in 7?

what about the power options ? for one I always go to power options by rigth clicking the battery icon, but I could also use the power menu by right clicking the lower left corner.

and if I was searching for it, I'll gladly sacrifice that oh so horrible single down arrow click to separate application searches from settings searches and files searches. it's a MUCH better system.

and no, the dumb user, in this case parent, doesn't expect anything.

"click the winkey and write remote, and click down arrow once"

"Oh I see this thing that says invite someone to help you"

"yeah click that".

Windows 8 is rubbish and so are the drivers for it. I don't need any flaming it just my opinion.

I don't know about Win 8 being rubbish, but I simply see no advantage in buying it.

I wouldn't be doing anything better or faster. ;)

  • Like 2

what about the power options ? for one I always go to power options by rigth clicking the battery icon, but I could also use the power menu by right clicking the lower left corner.

and if I was searching for it, I'll gladly sacrifice that oh so horrible single down arrow click to separate application searches from settings searches and files searches. it's a MUCH better system.

and no, the dumb user, in this case parent, doesn't expect anything.

"click the winkey and write remote, and click down arrow once"

"Oh I see this thing that says invite someone to help you"

"yeah click that".

Yes you can still get to the things you need, however Windows 8 has made getting there a more difficult experience. I actually like the new Start menu, but its just these little annoyances that kill the experience for me. Death by a 1,000 cuts or in this case an extra step here, an confusing rewording there, etc.

Yes you can still get to the things you need, however Windows 8 has made getting there a more difficult experience. I actually like the new Start menu, but its just these little annoyances that kill the experience for me. Death by a 1,000 cuts or in this case an extra step here, an confusing rewording there, etc.

How are things more difficult to get to ?

the power user tools are all on the right click power menu. so they only thing that's actually harder to get to is the shutdown, which anti 8 people keeps pulling up. which is funny since it's a function that's at MOST for the average person used once a day. and for the more techie users often never, and for the average user with a laptop, also never since they just close the lid. heck most of them are to dumb to check that the laptop has gone to sleep/shutdown before they put it in a bag.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • All these CEOs got the biggest boners thinking about firing employees for AI. Turned out it was just a wet dream.
    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!