So I've been reading up on the spec sheet for a few spare 15K seagate/HP SCSI hard drives I've got lying around, thought it'd be a good idea to sling them together for a software RAID0 (Please go and moan ELSEWHERE before even thinking of posting anything about RAID0 reliability - I don't care about it nor what you have to say about it).
So on said spec sheet there was mention that the 18.2GB SCSI drives are actually 23.5GB unformatted and that the extra data is used as spare blocks and whatnot, 18.2GB is the formatted size when the drive is setup with a block size of 512 bytes per sector, and the spec sheet says it can be changed to any even number between 512 and 704 - so I was interested to hear if anyone has ever changed the block size on a SCSI drive and any pros or cons they've got from doing so? There was mention on the man page of the linux utility sg_format (used for changing block size) of 'short stroking', reducing the block size to give you less space but much better performance.
So as these are kinda oldish 15Krpm 18.2GB Ultra 160 SCSI drives I was thinking of changing the block size to give around 20GB of space on each drive then installing arch linux on them using software RAID0.
I'd be interested to hear from anyone that's tried to do this or done it or had problems trying to do it (but again - no RAID0 reliability talk - read enough threads from all over the internet where something is asked about RAID0 and every response is exactly the same saying 'dont do it bad reliability')






