Buying a new PC, need advice


Recommended Posts

I am getting a new PC and I am trying to choose between an AMD and Intel system. The AMD is only $5 cheaper. I will be mainly using this for software development, but i would really like something that will run the new Sim City when it comes out w/o issue.

CPU: Intel? Core? i5-3570 3.40 GHz

HDD: 120 GB SAMSUNG 840 Series SATA-III 6.0Gb/s SSD

MEMORY: 8GB (4GBx2) DDR3/1600MHz Dual Channel Memory Kingston HyperX

MOTHERBOARD: [CrossFireX] GIGABYTE GA-Z77-D3H Intel Z77 Chipset DDR3 ATX Mainboard

SOUND: HIGH DEFINITION ON-BOARD 7.1 AUDIO

VIDEO: AMD Radeon HD 7770

CPU: AMD FX-8350 4.00 GHz

HDD: 120 GB SAMSUNG 840 Series SATA-III 6.0Gb/s SSD

MEMORY: 8GB (4GBx2) DDR3/1600MHz Dual Channel Memory Kingston HyperX

MOTHERBOARD: GIGABYTE GA-970A-D3

SOUND: HIGH DEFINITION ON-BOARD 7.1 AUDIO

VIDEO: AMD Radeon HD 7770

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1130206-buying-a-new-pc-need-advice/
Share on other sites

Intel

Not sure about the 7770 though. The new Sim City will probably not be a demanding game but if you plan to play at 1080p a 7850 might be safer to be sure to have a smooth experience. If you plan to play at low res then the 7770 should be enough.

If you don't plan to play games until Sim City comes out i would use the gpu inside the cpu until the game comes out. There might be better cards for the same price until then.

The 7770 will likely be enough to play Sim City. But if you don't play anything now i would wait to buy the card just to be sure.

First thing's first, get the i5.

Also, I'd recommend you don't get that Samsung 840. Unless it's the Pro version, it's not a good SSD. A great budget SSD is the Crucial M4. I highly recommend it, and it will probably save you some money.

And with that, I would also highly recommend spending the little extra to at least get the GTX 650 Ti. I think the 7850 is basically the same price as the Ti, but also faster. So if you don't mind AMD, that's probably the best bang for your buck. The regular 650 is a really weak card, and you'd even be better off buying a used GTX 460 than that.

Ive been out of the hardware scene for a while, so im not up to speed on a few things. Back when i kept up, it was easy to tell what was the "better" gfx card because of the number. So its odd to hear that a 460GTX is better than a 650GTX.

The only other option i have for an SSD is a SanDisk (sorry i dont have the model# for it, its a 128GB (its listed as having 490 MB/s Read & 350 MB/s Write if that helps)

Ive been out of the hardware scene for a while, so im not up to speed on a few things. Back when i kept up, it was easy to tell what was the "better" gfx card because of the number. So its odd to hear that a 460GTX is better than a 650GTX.

The only option i have for an SSD is a SanDisk (sorry i dont have the model# for it, its a 128GB (its listed as having 490 MB/s Read & 350 MB/s Write if that helps)

The 650 and 77xx series of cards are mostly for HTPC.

The 7770 and 650ti can be used to play games but only the less demanding ones (the 650ti is better).

A 6950 will likely perform better than a 7770. And a 560ti will likely perform better than a 650 too. [edit] i just checked and a 6950/560ti will indeed perform better than both the 650ti and 7770 /

If you don't have enough money you should look to buy a used card from previous generation. 6950/70 and 560 ti are still very good cards. In fact according to reviews even the old 5850 and 460 will occasionally outperform them here and there

http://www.guru3d.co...ference,14.html

Basically

460 and 5850 are mostly equal to 650ti and 7770

470 and 5870 are still slightly better than 650ti and 7770

6950 and 560ti are better

6970 and 570 are clearly better by a safe margin

Try to find a used 560ti or 6950 for a good price. imo buying a 7770 would be a mistake. I just sold last decembre a used 6950 xxx for 120$. Most of the people are still selling those for 150+ but if you wait you'll surely find a bargain in the 120-140$ for a used one.

Ive been out of the hardware scene for a while, so im not up to speed on a few things. Back when i kept up, it was easy to tell what was the "better" gfx card because of the number. So its odd to hear that a 460GTX is better than a 650GTX.

With Nvidia, the first number is the "generation" number. So the 460 would be the 4th generation, the 650 would be the 6th generation, and so on.

The second number is the tier. So a 460 would be a 6th tier and would be technically better than a 650, which is a 5th tier.

It seems the biggest difference between generations is power consumption, due to more efficient transistor tech and whatnot. So since the 460 is an older card, it is a little more power hungry than the newer ones. As long as you don't have something weak like a 300W power supply, you'll be fine though.

With Nvidia, the first number is the "generation" number. So the 460 would be the 4th generation, the 650 would be the 6th generation, and so on.

The second number is the tier. So a 460 would be a 6th tier and would be technically better than a 650, which is a 5th tier.

It seems the biggest difference between generations is power consumption, due to more efficient transistor tech and whatnot. So since the 460 is an older card, it is a little more power hungry than the newer ones. As long as you don't have something weak like a 300W power supply, you'll be fine though.

Thanks. When you said the Samsung SSD wasnt good, is that because of performance or because of reliability/durability?

Thanks. When you said the Samsung SSD wasnt good, is that because of performance or because of reliability/durability?

Yeah the regular 840 uses a type of NAND memory that's slower and has a shorter lifespan than other SSDs out there. So for the sake of both of those things, the Crucial M4 would be a much better choice.

It's explained in a bit more detail here:

http://techreport.com/review/23990/samsung-840-pro-series-ssd-reviewed

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Pretty nice tool, thanks
    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      455
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!