Dick Montage Posted April 20, 2015 Share Posted April 20, 2015 Pretty sure I read somewhere that zebras could not be tamed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hurmoth Posted April 20, 2015 Share Posted April 20, 2015 But basically - crocodiles can be and have been trained. Crocodiles are the closest living thing to a dinosaur - therefore, you can make the assumption that dinosaurs could be trained. Just because you don't like the storyline doesn't mean its implausible. (Assuming that you suspend the disbelief of dinosaurs existing). Closest living thing does not equal dinosaur, so again conjecture. The fact of the matter is, there's no scientific basis for either of our opinions and I chose to believe differently than you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LOC Veteran Posted April 20, 2015 Veteran Share Posted April 20, 2015 Guys, it's a movie. Who cares about reality and the real animal kingdom when it comes to Jurrasic Park (world, whatever). They make ###### up for the movies all the time that can or cannot happen in reality. If you can believe you can tame almost any animal as it is, why would a raptor be any different really? Just because they were walking killing machines doesn't matter in the end really. Also, tamed raptors. Come on that's pretty cool if you think about it, they could do some really neat stuff in the movie (probably won't though). As long as they don't have lasers attached or rocket launchers! psmoked 1 Share Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
episode Posted April 20, 2015 Share Posted April 20, 2015 Closest living thing does not equal dinosaur, so again conjecture. The fact of the matter is, there's no scientific basis for either of our opinions and I chose to believe differently than you. There IS scientific basis, you just choose to ignore it. Once again, point out an animal with the cognitive ability to understand a human that has not been trained. Are you going to somehow say that an elephant is some kind of super-genius and therefore smarter than dinosaurs? Do you know why they got the name 'velociraptor'? Because the original discovery was of them with a lot of eggs between them, leading the scientist to believe they had stole them. They were wrong - the pack was actually in a formation around the eggs, trying to protect them. They were as smart as most animals today - probably not primates, but something like an elephant, for sure. Guys, it's a movie. Who cares about reality and the real animal kingdom when it comes to Jurrasic Park (world, whatever). They make ###### up for the movies all the time that can or cannot happen in reality. If you can believe you can tame almost any animal as it is, why would a raptor be any different really? Just because they were walking killing machines doesn't matter in the end really. Also, tamed raptors. Come on that's pretty cool if you think about it, they could do some really neat stuff in the movie (probably won't though). As long as they don't have lasers attached or rocket launchers! I'm not worried about it being a movie. I'm just saying that it WOULD be possible, because they've TRAINED (not tamed - thats different) everything else. And from the trailer, these are not tamed - he was still scared of them. TDT 1 Share Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+E.Worm Jimmy Subscriber¹ Posted April 20, 2015 Subscriber¹ Share Posted April 20, 2015 LOL!!!!!! this has to be the coolest video edit i have seen recently (or ever...) +Nexus18 1 Share Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dipsylalapo Supervisor Posted April 22, 2015 Supervisor Share Posted April 22, 2015 New trailer dropped last night TDT 1 Share Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rappy Veteran Posted April 23, 2015 Veteran Share Posted April 23, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Warwagon MVC Posted April 23, 2015 MVC Share Posted April 23, 2015 This movie just keeps looking dumber and dumber with each new clip released. I mean you could have shown any clip from the first one and it would have been awesome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Montage Posted April 24, 2015 Share Posted April 24, 2015 Crocodiles are the closest living thing to a dinosaur Uh... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TDT Posted April 24, 2015 Share Posted April 24, 2015 Uh... I agree with him, crocs are the only animals on this planet that changed very little compared to the dinosaur period. See this: One way in which prehistoric crocodiles were indeed more impressive than their terrestrial relatives was their ability, as a group, to survive the K/T Extinction Event that wiped the dinosaurs off the face of the earth 65 million years ago (why this is so remains a mystery, though it may be an important clue that no plus-sized crocodiles survived the meteor impact). Today's crocodiles and alligators are little changed from their prehistoric ancestors, a telling clue that these reptiles were (and remain) extremely well adapted to their environment. (See this article for theories about why crocodiles survived into the Cenozoic Era.) http://dinosaurs.about.com/od/typesofdinosaurs/a/crocodilians.htm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rappy Veteran Posted April 27, 2015 Veteran Share Posted April 27, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daedroth Posted April 27, 2015 Share Posted April 27, 2015 I watched the trailer for this over the weekend...and well...I didn't think it'd be that bad! I always knew it was not going to get anywhere near the original in terms of awesomeness, but the trailer makes it look super cheesy! I'll still be going to see it though... MikeChipshop 1 Share Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George P Global Moderator Posted April 27, 2015 Global Moderator Share Posted April 27, 2015 It's weird how nostalgia boosts old movies to some mythical level of greatness in our minds. Don't get me wrong, I like the original, but it's not this great masterpiece some of you make it sound like it is. The only noteworthy thing about the original was it's cutting edge use of giant animatronics, the story isn't any different from what this new movie is using, heck it's pretty much almost the same with the only exception being they went a little too far with the gene splicing and now they have a very smart dinosaur out there eating people. The plot between the two movies is pretty much 90% the same, if not more. FunkyMike 1 Share Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FunkyMike Posted April 27, 2015 Share Posted April 27, 2015 It's weird how nostalgia boosts old movies to some mythical level of greatness in our minds. Don't get me wrong, I like the original, but it's not this great masterpiece some of you make it sound like it is. The only noteworthy thing about the original was it's cutting edge use of giant animatronics, the story isn't any different from what this new movie is using, heck it's pretty much almost the same with the only exception being they went a little too far with the gene splicing and now they have a very smart dinosaur out there eating people. The plot between the two movies is pretty much 90% the same, if not more. It is like nostalgia about ex girlfriends .. when you think back she sound nice with noteworthy aspects.. but in reality she was probably a gene spliced T-Rex. MikeChipshop 1 Share Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rappy Veteran Posted April 30, 2015 Veteran Share Posted April 30, 2015 "Jurassic World" Ignores Other Sequels Read More Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rappy Veteran Posted May 15, 2015 Veteran Share Posted May 15, 2015 That narration! Skiver, DaddyRazzy, +Nexus18 and 1 other 4 Share Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Draconian Guppy Posted May 15, 2015 Share Posted May 15, 2015 Man pg 13 is going to suck so bad some of those scenes in that extended spot won't even be in the movie. (notice it doesn't have a rating) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rappy Veteran Posted May 18, 2015 Veteran Share Posted May 18, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George P Global Moderator Posted May 19, 2015 Global Moderator Share Posted May 19, 2015 This whole PG-13 fad in Hollywood is really killing movies that should otherwise be rated R IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yusuf M. Veteran Posted May 19, 2015 Veteran Share Posted May 19, 2015 This whole PG-13 fad in Hollywood is really killing movies that should otherwise be rated R IMO. It's all about the money. Bumping up the rating to R would mean less tickets sold because anyone under the age of 18 wouldn't be allowed to watch it in theatres (or they'd need to be accompanied by a parent, depending on the country). Parents are less likely to bring their kids along to an R-rated movie. PaulATMOS 1 Share Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
episode Posted May 19, 2015 Share Posted May 19, 2015 Man pg 13 is going to suck so bad some of those scenes in that extended spot won't even be in the movie. (notice it doesn't have a rating) This whole PG-13 fad in Hollywood is really killing movies that should otherwise be rated R IMO. The other JP movies were all PG-13. To be rated R a movie needs one of: The F-word Tobacco use Hard drugs Nudity Graphic violence None of those really apply to JP movies. There is a big difference between violence and graphic violence - and JP doesn't need graphic violence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luc2k Posted May 19, 2015 Share Posted May 19, 2015 The other JP movies were all PG-13. To be rated R a movie needs one of: The F-word Tobacco use Hard drugs Nudity Graphic violence None of those really apply to JP movies. There is a big difference between violence and graphic violence - and JP doesn't need graphic violence. It doesn't need it, but it would be greatly improved if it had it. Look at crocodiles or any other big reptiles eating prey and tell me something a lot larger doing the same would not make the film better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
episode Posted May 19, 2015 Share Posted May 19, 2015 It doesn't need it, but it would be greatly improved if it had it. Look at crocodiles or any other big reptiles eating prey and tell me something a lot larger doing the same would not make the film better. Uh, it can show violence at PG-13. It just can't show graphic violence - such as horror movie type stuff. And no, showing gore for the sake of gore doesn't make anything better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George P Global Moderator Posted May 19, 2015 Global Moderator Share Posted May 19, 2015 Uh, it can show violence at PG-13. It just can't show graphic violence - such as horror movie type stuff. And no, showing gore for the sake of gore doesn't make anything better. How can you not show gore in a movie about dinosaurs attacking and eating people of all things? The rating system in the US is crazy, action movie full of people getting shot, things blowing up, and overall chaos, PG-13, sure, bring the kids, no problem! Show a bit more blood, for the sake of some realism, or heaven forbid a semi-nude women/man, and it's suddenly, "omg think of the children!". Draconian Guppy, Syanide, Luc2k and 2 others 5 Share Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FunkyMike Posted May 20, 2015 Share Posted May 20, 2015 So much Mercedes porn. This is starting to remind me of A Good Day to Die Hard. +E.Worm Jimmy and Dot Matrix 2 Share Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts