Recommended Posts

Well, after CES I was completely sure: I want the Sony Xperia Z.

I think this could be the best all-round smartphone of the year. 5" Full HD display, blazing fast Snapdragon S4 Pro, LTE, glass front and back, waterproof (!), 13MP cam with actual HDR video and photo's, really high-quality materials, quite thin, small footprint for it's screen size, SD card slot (unlike most recent phones), ... I doubt any other smartphone can reach this level of 'completeness' (especially on the waterproofing part) in the near future.

What Sony did with Android is also quite nice in my opinion. The Album and Walkman app are both vastly superior to what is included with AOSP and to anything available on the market in my opinion (I have them on my current phone too). It has Miracast and NFC support and pretty much everything Sony is bringing to the market these days can be paired with these phones using NFC.

Anyone else really wants or pre-ordered this phone (or the Xperia ZL)?

xperia-z-gallery-05-1240x840-90551b87b4461479d6319170e8d491f7.png

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1130430-sony-xperia-z-pre-order-placed/
Share on other sites

It's definitely on my radar as my next phone (I usually upgrade in Q1), but I have to wonder what Motorola, HTC and Samsung will be bringing to the table. There's a possibility that a few months after the Xperia Z hits the market that HTC/Samsung will release Tegra 4/Snapdragon 800 phones which could have an equally good feature set.

That said I still want to get my hands on the Xperia Z for a review. But for purchasing I might want to see what HTC and Samsung have up their sleeves for their 2013 releases

I doubt we'll see any Snapdragon 800's before H2 (Xperia Z hits the markets end of Feb over here). The samples haven't even gone out to manufacturers yet. The Tegra 4 is probably too power-hungry to put in a phone and if Samsung puts an Exynos 5 with four A15 cores in the S4 it'll be seriously crippled by extreme throttling/heating/power drain when under continous load. The S4 Pro is probably the fastest chip with reasonable power requirements out there right now.

What I just really like about the Xperia Z is how thin it is and how nice the materials look. It literally has glass on every side (all the borders are some glass fibre polymer stuff too)! And well, it's waterproof. Sony has a lot more experience with waterproofing phones than any other brand, so I doubt Samsung or HTC will be doing that for a flagship.

I'd be tempted to hold out and see what the S4 has to offer or the new HTC phones but seeing how delayed things are in the U.S (the s2 took forever to get over to AT&T!) I'll likely be eligible for an upgrade right around the time this comes out.

I'd be tempted to hold out and see what the S4 has to offer or the new HTC phones but seeing how delayed things are in the U.S (the s2 took forever to get over to AT&T!) I'll likely be eligible for an upgrade right around the time this comes out.

In the US you'll have to settle for the TL though, and only on AT&T and maybe T-Mobile. Probably not even available through the carriers but only unlocked. Sony is putting the US market on lower priority and is instead focusing on strengthening it's position on the European and Japanese markets (which aren't as screwed up by carriers). You can actually buy a phone unlocked in any European country and be 100% sure it'll work on all other European networks.

In the US you'll have to settle for the TL though, and only on AT&T and maybe T-Mobile. Probably not even available through the carriers but only unlocked. Sony is putting the US market on lower priority and is instead focusing on strengthening it's position on the European and Japanese markets (which aren't as screwed up by carriers). You can actually buy a phone unlocked in any European country and be 100% sure it'll work on all other European networks.

Just looked up the TL. Smaller resolution on front camera, not 1080p (which may be overkill anyways on a phone), dual core(are apps taking advantage of quad core yet?) and a smaller screen.

Blegh. I will say, Europe gets the best phones. And yeah, our carriers are pretty lame. It may be cheaper to buy an unlocked Xperia Z, get mobile data only and simply use Google voice. If an unlocked Xperia Z would work here. Anyways, very sexy phone.

Just looked up the TL. Smaller resolution on front camera, not 1080p (which may be overkill anyways on a phone), dual core(are apps taking advantage of quad core yet?) and a smaller screen.

Blegh. I will say, Europe gets the best phones. And yeah, our carriers are pretty lame. It may be cheaper to buy an unlocked Xperia Z, get mobile data only and simply use Google voice. If an unlocked Xperia Z would work here. Anyways, very sexy phone.

Unlocked Z would work on AT&T (not T-Mo) but without LTE.

The TL and T are exactly the same, I don't know where you got the specs for the TL. Only difference is front camera, body and network support! So you lose the waterproofing but you gain a more compact handset and an IR transmitter (so you can use it as universal remote, includes an app that supports all TV brands). They both have the same quadcore SoC :)

No. After Xperia S, No more Sony.

Besides the LCD resolution, I failed to see which part of this phone is better than Nexus 4.

And frankly why do we need 5 inches screen? Why do we need 1080P in a 5 incher?

What's wrong with the Xperia S? I still have one, does fine!

I personally think this phone is better in terms of network (LTE), body (waterproof + thinner), camera (13MP + HDR, 10 full-size shots per sec endless burst) and memory, with always 16GB on board and a microSD slot. And probably display. And oh, it has an FM radio (which I still like from time to time). Then there are personal preferences: I think Sony's media apps are brilliant and the design of this phone is amazing).

Plenty of reasons not to go for a Nexus 4. The availability is another thing, over here in Belgium the Nexus 4 has to be purchased through grey import and is ridiculously expensive.

You don't need a 5" 1080p display, but this phone is hardly any bigger than a Nexus 4. At 5mm taller and 2mm wider you can hardly complain about the size of this phone compared to the Nexus 4. Sony managed to deliver a bigger screen without making the phone any bigger. And while 300-ish PPI is nice, it's the 400+ barrier that really pushes edges to perfect sharpness. In small shapes and fonts the 320 PPI of the Nexus 4 (and all other smartphones around that PPI) is just not completely enough to make it 100% perfectly sharp and smooth.

Honestly I just went with the first site I came across: http://www.phonearen...hones/7505,7539

http://developer.sonymobile.com/products/phones/specification/xperiazl/ has all the specs for the ZL.

(http://developer.sonymobile.com/products/phones/specification/xperiaz/ for the Z)

What's wrong with the Xperia S? I still have one, does fine!

I personally think this phone is better in terms of network (LTE), body (waterproof + thinner), camera (13MP + HDR, 10 full-size shots per sec endless burst) and memory, with always 16GB on board and a microSD slot. And probably display. And oh, it has an FM radio (which I still like from time to time). Then there are personal preferences: I think Sony's media apps are brilliant and the design of this phone is amazing).

Plenty of reasons not to go for a Nexus 4. The availability is another thing, over here in Belgium the Nexus 4 has to be purchased through grey import and is ridiculously expensive.

You don't need a 5" 1080p display, but this phone is hardly any bigger than a Nexus 4. At 5mm taller and 2mm wider you can hardly complain about the size of this phone compared to the Nexus 4. Sony managed to deliver a bigger screen without making the phone any bigger. And while 300-ish PPI is nice, it's the 400+ barrier that really pushes edges to perfect sharpness. In small shapes and fonts the 320 PPI of the Nexus 4 (and all other smartphones around that PPI) is just not completely enough to make it 100% perfectly sharp and smooth.

http://developer.son...ation/xperiazl/ has all the specs for the ZL.

(http://developer.son...cation/xperiaz/ for the Z)

I would like to see one single manufacturer has the backbone to improve two things: battery and color reproduction accuracy.

Xperia S is fine, for the first few months I got it. Then it went downhill from there. From the reason you mentioned, I think mSDHC slot is the only valid reason of buying a XZ.

If you like Sony that much, as a matter of fact yes you do since I remember you from XDA forums, along with K900, good for you that you preordered it.

For me? No more Sony.

I would like to see one single manufacturer has the backbone to improve two things: battery and color reproduction accuracy.

Xperia S is fine, for the first few months I got it. Then it went downhill from there. From the reason you mentioned, I think mSDHC slot is the only valid reason of buying a XZ.

If you like Sony that much, as a matter of fact yes you do since I remember you from XDA forums, along with K900, good for you that you preordered it.

For me? No more Sony.

Well I can understand the Xperia S isn't perfect. Build quality wasn't as good as your average iPhone and the battery could be a bit weird at times, but I personally never had issues with it. I've been using mine for over 10 months now and still like it a lot.

On colour accuracy, I think that we're pretty much there. HTC and Apple are both very good, with very low Delta E (where Samsung does extremely bad with their AMOLED's). HTC and Sony do very, very well on colour temperature, reaching almost exactly 6500K. On brightness Sony is the undisputable winner, and on contrast the Nexus 4 does best, followed by Apple, HTC and Sony. Source: http://tweakers.net/reviews/2881/3/shoot-out-smartphones-getest-op-accu-scherm-en-meer-scherm.html (in Dutch but should be easy enough to understand)

Battery is something I agree on, but I also think it's fine the way it is. I'm absolutely not doing anything to make sure my battery lasts longer (all syncs and connections pretty much always on and relatively heavy use) and my battery still lasts me all day, every day.

Oh. I was comparing the wrong phone I think >_>. Well then! Can't wait for the ZL to hit AT&T :)

Will you post a review of the Z when you get it?

Yes! It's scheduled for delivery 28 Feb (the day after my birthday) but it might be sooner. Can expect a review here and on The Verge forums a few days after that!

Looks good, but not 'pure' Android, like some of the Nexus devices. You'd have to root and ROM to get the most out of this phone. It's too early in the year to tell if this will be 'the' superphone, after all it's only January. There are events like MWC, and Google IO, so I'll wait till other manufacturers announce phones. I have an upgrade eligible in October, but I wouldn't be able to keep my unlimited data plan with Verizon if I did that. I'd have to buy the phone outright anyways, so I'll probably wait till later in the year.

Well I can understand the Xperia S isn't perfect. Build quality wasn't as good as your average iPhone and the battery could be a bit weird at times, but I personally never had issues with it. I've been using mine for over 10 months now and still like it a lot.

On colour accuracy, I think that we're pretty much there. HTC and Apple are both very good, with very low Delta E (where Samsung does extremely bad with their AMOLED's). HTC and Sony do very, very well on colour temperature, reaching almost exactly 6500K. On brightness Sony is the undisputable winner, and on contrast the Nexus 4 does best, followed by Apple, HTC and Sony. Source: http://tweakers.net/...eer-scherm.html (in Dutch but should be easy enough to understand)

Battery is something I agree on, but I also think it's fine the way it is. I'm absolutely not doing anything to make sure my battery lasts longer (all syncs and connections pretty much always on and relatively heavy use) and my battery still lasts me all day, every day.

Yes! It's scheduled for delivery 28 Feb (the day after my birthday) but it might be sooner. Can expect a review here and on The Verge forums a few days after that!

I think you misunderstood what I meant by color reproduction accuracy..maybe I wasn't very clear.

I would like to see a phone with wider color gamut, including using wider color gamut in its camera DSP. Adobe RGB? ProPhoto? And correspond with a LCD display capable of 95% of the said color gamut.

With the $349 I paid for Nexus 4, and almost $600 I paid for Xperia S, I will never buy a Sony again. Not to mention the yellow spots, updates, and battery life problems of the first batch.

Looks good, but not 'pure' Android, like some of the Nexus devices. You'd have to root and ROM to get the most out of this phone. It's too early in the year to tell if this will be 'the' superphone, after all it's only January. There are events like MWC, and Google IO, so I'll wait till other manufacturers announce phones. I have an upgrade eligible in October, but I wouldn't be able to keep my unlimited data plan with Verizon if I did that. I'd have to buy the phone outright anyways, so I'll probably wait till later in the year.

Sony's skin is THE best 3rd party skin. Very pleasant to use and tastefully designed.

Looks good, but not 'pure' Android, like some of the Nexus devices. You'd have to root and ROM to get the most out of this phone.

I'm not so sure. This one comes with 4.1.2, and 4.2 hardly adds anything. Miracast was in Sony's smartphones before Google even announced 4.2, gesture keyboard has been in Sony's since 2011 and multi-user support is irrelevant on smartphones. The only 'new' things you'd miss out on are lockscreen widgets and daydream, two things that in my opinion aren't worth sacrificing Sony's media applications and camera app. And personally I think Sony's skin looks a lot better than a clean Android. A lot more elegant, refined and neutral. Not everything has to be cyan Google :p

But even if you want to root your phone or put a new ROM on it, it's quite easy. Sony is very open to devs and is fast with releasing as much source code as possible. They allow you to unlock the bootloader and once you do that installing a new ROM is done in a few minutes. Sony's are possibly the simplest phones to install ROM's on there are.

I think you misunderstood what I meant by color reproduction accuracy..maybe I wasn't very clear.

I would like to see a phone with wider color gamut, including using wider color gamut in its camera DSP. Adobe RGB? ProPhoto? And correspond with a LCD display capable of 95% of the said color gamut.

With the $349 I paid for Nexus 4, and almost $600 I paid for Xperia S, I will never buy a Sony again. Not to mention the yellow spots, updates, and battery life problems of the first batch.

Okay, a wider colour gamut would be nice. I'm not sure what one it is exactly, but Sony lists a wide colour gamut as a feature for the Xperia Z and ZL (and they've never done that before). Reviewers have said that the colour range is amazing. I'll try to compare it with my monitor (full sRGB and almost full AdobeRGB), but since I don't have any equipment I'll have to do it by eye.

I'm not so sure. This one comes with 4.1.2, and 4.2 hardly adds anything. Miracast was in Sony's smartphones before Google even announced 4.2, gesture keyboard has been in Sony's since 2011 and multi-user support is irrelevant on smartphones. The only 'new' things you'd miss out on are lockscreen widgets and daydream, two things that in my opinion aren't worth sacrificing Sony's media applications and camera app. And personally I think Sony's skin looks a lot better than a clean Android. A lot more elegant, refined and neutral. Not everything has to be cyan Google :p

But even if you want to root your phone or put a new ROM on it, it's quite easy. Sony is very open to devs and is fast with releasing as much source code as possible. They allow you to unlock the bootloader and once you do that installing a new ROM is done in a few minutes. Sony's are possibly the simplest phones to install ROM's on there are.

It's not just about Android 4.2. It's about future updates - at least with a nexus device, you will get updates from Google, and quick. Also, the dev. community at XDA and other sites will be tremendous. You can easily mod your phone to whatever you want it to look like. Subjective, but after you use a Nexus phone, there really is no going back to a manufacturer skin. If I had to get a non-Nexus phone, I'd have to make sure the dev. community behind it is big (plenty of custom and AOSP ROM's) :) I'm not bashing on this device - we just need to wait and see what other devices are announced.

You don't have to tell me about installing ROM's, unlocking bootloader, etc. It's easy enough to look it up, and to just do it.

No. After Xperia S, No more Sony.

Besides the LCD resolution, I failed to see which part of this phone is better than Nexus 4.

And frankly why do we need 5 inches screen? Why do we need 1080P in a 5 incher?

Im looking for a 5"+ display for work. Im currently looking at the Note2 but I might hold off and wait for this cause Im still not 100% sure I want something that large. Id like to see a size comparison of the two.

Im looking for a 5"+ display for work. Im currently looking at the Note2 but I might hold off and wait for this cause Im still not 100% sure I want something that large. Id like to see a size comparison of the two.

The Z is the same physical size as the Galaxy S3 (even though it has a 5" display), so you can compare the S3 and Note2 to see what it's like.

Since you're in the US the ZL might be more interesting. It is actually physically smaller than the Galaxy S3 but still packs the 5" display (tiny bezels)!

Xperia Z vs Galaxy Note 2:

Ya I was just going over the specs of all 4, S3-Note2-Z/ZL. I want a large display to work, trade off of but the Note 2 S-pen offers a great fine pointer option that no other high end phone Iv seen offers. Other stylus pens have that fat end piece that doesn't give me the small detail I need when I want to place orders into my trading program. That's why Iv been looking at the note 2. If I can find a fine point stylus pen that would work with the sony, I might hold off for that.

Ya I was just going over the specs of all 4, S3-Note2-Z/ZL. I want a large display to work, trade off of but the Note 2 S-pen offers a great fine pointer option that no other high end phone Iv seen offers. Other stylus pens have that fat end piece that doesn't give me the small detail I need when I want to place orders into my trading program. That's why Iv been looking at the note 2. If I can find a fine point stylus pen that would work with the sony, I might hold off for that.

The Sony doesn't have a digitizer for a stylus so you'll never be able to use anything other than those typical big-pointed (and pretty crappy) capacitive styluses. Note 2 is probably the phone for you if you need that.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • With the current hardware prices Microsoft should lift the restriction. Then if you have the correct TPM then allow you to use X feature, if you don't have the correct TPM then don't but still actually let you run windows. 11. With a disclaimer during install that X features would be unavailable.
    • It's good for recycling of course. But commence inflation of a second hand RAM bubble and price gouging on DDR 4 inventory in 3... 2... 1...
    • Bypassed Windows 11 shows surprising stability on ancient, completely unsupported hardware by Sayan Sen When Windows 11 was first released, one of the most complained-about issues with the new desktop Microsoft OS was its higher system requirements, which pushed many relatively modern and powerful processors and devices onto the officially unsupported list. Thankfully, they have not been updated again for the base OS, though systems require four times the memory and storage if they want to run AI-powered apps and features. As such, Windows 11 technically runs on 4GB of memory, and there is no imposed restriction on the generation of memory it supports. Speaking of memory, prices are extremely high nowadays for hardware, especially DDR5 and DDR4 kits due to the current silicon shortage, and there are also reports of it affecting DDR2 as well, and it might only be a matter of time before even DDR1 gets affected. Before that could happen, an enthusiast took an ancient DDR1-based system and decided to try out Windows 11 on it to see how well the modern OS would fare on such hardware. The system runs an outdated graphics card interface standard based on AGP, or Advanced Graphics Port, called AGP 3.0 or AGP8x. AGP was essentially succeeded by the modern PCI Express (PCIe) bus standard. The user behind the experiment is retro hardware enthusiast Omores, who built the system around an ASRock ConRoe865PE motherboard based on Intel's i865PE chipset from way back in 2003, around the time when AGP was still in fashion. What made this board special back in the day was its unusual support for newer Core 2 Duo and even Core 2 Quad processors while still retaining older DDR1 memory support and an AGP8X graphics slot, making it an ideal bridge or link between two vastly different generations. Powering the machine was Intel's Core 2 Quad Q6600 alongside 3GB of DDR1 RAM and an ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP graphics card, one of the final and most capable GPUs released for the aging AGP interface. While installing Windows 11 itself was relatively easy by bypassing Microsoft's hardware checks, getting the graphics card fully functional proved to be some challenge. Microsoft had quietly dropped native AGP support after the earliest releases of Windows 10, meaning newer versions of Windows no longer include the necessary Graphics Address Remapping Table (GART) drivers required for proper AGP acceleration. Without them, AGP graphics cards typically boot up, though with limited functionality, and can often throw a Code 43 error in Device Manager. To work around the limitation, Omores extracted Intel's legacy AGP440 SYS driver from an early Windows 10 release and paired it with a modified INF file so Windows 11 would correctly recognize the chipset. Following this and combined with AMD's final 64-bit Catalyst AGP drivers from 2012, the Radeon HD 4650 was able to operate with full AGP 8X acceleration intact. The result was said to be surprisingly usable for hardware that is over two decades old. Hardware-accelerated H.264 video playback worked correctly and benefited apps like Firefox, while legacy applications and games ran without major graphical issues. The system also successfully completed the 3DMark 2001 benchmark, although performance naturally lagged behind what the same hardware achieves under Windows 7, which is significantly lighter than Windows 11. There was, however, one unavoidable limitation as Microsoft's Windows 11 version 24H2 introduces a mandatory SSE4.2 CPU instruction requirement that cannot be bypassed through installer modifications or registry tweaks. Since no AGP-era processor supports SSE4.2, Windows 11 version 23H2 effectively becomes the final release capable of running on such systems. Regardless, it is still a very cool feat and quite fascinating to see just how stable Windows 11 turned out to be on such unfamiliar hardware. Source: Omores (Patreon) via O_MORES (Reddit)
    • That will only really help other players that are also responsible for creating the problem.
    • Well, it's good to know that they have found a workaround to a problem that they helped create, I guess...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      538
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!