NASA solves 30-year solar puzzle with 5 minutes and $5 million


Recommended Posts

NASA solves 30-year solar puzzle with 5 minutes and $5 million

600

The full resolution image is from the solar active region, outlined in the upper left image. Below it are partial frame images

of the braided ensemble, an example of magnetic recognition and flaring, and fine stranded loops. A portion of a filament channel

is shown in the upper right image. (NASA)

Scientists have taken the highest resolution images of the sun?s atmosphere ever, and it offers an explanation for the decades-old mystery of why its outer most layer is up to 800 times hotter than its surface.

Using photos from the High Resolution Coronal Imager (Hi-C) that was flung into space in July, scientists observed small bands of magnetism near the star?s surface twist, turn and braid together before snapping apart, releasing heat and energy flares that heated up the star?s atmosphere. NASA officials described their findings Wednesday.

The sun?s surface is a relatively cool 5,000 degrees Fahrenheit while its atmosphere, or corona, is between 2 million and 4 million degrees. The disparity has long puzzled scientists who study our nearest star.

With a $5-million budget, scientists designed, built and launched a 464-pound, 10-foot telescope into space from White Sands, N.M., in July. The telescope was outside of the atmosphere for only five minutes before it returned to Earth. But in those few minutes, the telescope took high-resolution images of the corona, revealing what the sun?s magnetic fields were doing on a local scale. NASA scientists likened that to taking a high-resolution photo of a dime from 10 miles away.

The images showed how the relatively small magnetic fields braid together into unbearable tension, then snap apart in flares that can be as hot as 7 million degrees. The images supported a theory first introduced in 1983 by American astrophysicist Eugene Parker that small solar flares were heating up the sun?s outer most layer.

?Sometimes this small-scale process stalls, extra stress builds up, and then the relaxation happens on a much larger scale, causing a flare or coronal mass ejection,? said Karel Schrijver, who worked on the mission and is a senior fellow at Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Center in Palo Alto.

A coronal mass ejection is a violent, massive burst of gas and magnetic fields from the sun. When the explosions are aimed toward Earth, they have been known to knock out power grids and damage satellites. But they can also bring on some pretty sweet northern lights, or Aurora Borealis.

?The flaring on the small scales and on the large scales all happen together,? Schrijver said. ?To understand why the solar corona behaves as it does, we need to see both the small and the large to understand how they connect, and ultimately drive space weather.?

Hi-C is part of NASA?s Low Cost Access to Space Program, which uses smaller-scale missions for science investigations, to test future technologies and train upcoming researchers students and engineers. The photos were shot near the peak of the sun?s 11-year cycle, offering scientists their best shot at photographing its smallest flares, researchers said.

Source

and how would they know how hot the core of the sun is? This makes no sense. Unless they physcially measured the temprature inside the sun then I call this bs.Its like me looking at a lightbulb I cant reach and saying the surface is hotter than the core becuase I took very high resolution images.

and how would they know how hot the core of the sun is? This makes no sense. Unless they physcially measured the temprature inside the sun then I call this bs.Its like me looking at a lightbulb I cant reach and saying the surface is hotter than the core becuase I took very high resolution images.

Ah, so you're an astro physicist, and know all about how they measure these things.?

and how would they know how hot the core of the sun is? This makes no sense. Unless they physcially measured the temprature inside the sun then I call this bs.Its like me looking at a lightbulb I cant reach and saying the surface is hotter than the core becuase I took very high resolution images.

Spectography and mathematics.

The telescope was outside of the atmosphere for only five minutes before it returned to Earth.

Is anyone else confused by this statement? They launched a satellite that only flew for 5 minutes? Did it malfunction? Was it only supposed to last 5 minutes? If so, that seems like a huge waste of money.

and how would they know how hot the core of the sun is? This makes no sense. Unless they physcially measured the temprature inside the sun then I call this bs.Its like me looking at a lightbulb I cant reach and saying the surface is hotter than the core becuase I took very high resolution images.

The same way scientists can look at stars thousands of light-years away and be able to tell how big it is, whether it's a binary system, what it's made out of, and among many other things, how hot it is...math, trig, and physics.

Also, the photos solved the mystery of why the Sun's atmosphere is way hotter than the surface. Nothing about the article references the core.

Weather balloons are technically satellites, a satellite isn't necessarily in space. The earliest satellites where balloons used to transmit radio waves.

Basically the satellite in question was never launched even close to high enough to reach orbit, only to grout side the visually disturbing atmosphere. To get in orbit it would have cost 100 times just to launch, andthen the satellite would have had to be designed to actually stay in spaces well. Instead of just get there and take pictures and return. So it would have cost 100 times as much as well, maybe more.

This one did what they needed for cheap. And served as a technology tested for future in space technology/satellite. Replacing tests that would have cost at least a much.

Ah, so you're an astro physicist, and know all about how they measure these things.?

so you believe everything they say? They could be chatting rubbish but no one can prove it so everyone believes it.

and how would they know how hot the core of the sun is? This makes no sense. Unless they physcially measured the temprature inside the sun then I call this bs.Its like me looking at a lightbulb I cant reach and saying the surface is hotter than the core becuase I took very high resolution images.

Physics, Doppler Effect, mathematics. read up on it sometime. it's fascinating!

so you believe everything they say? They could be chatting rubbish but no one can prove it so everyone believes it.

Do the math and science, you can prove it yourself. Unless you don't believe in math and science of course.

Obviously all scientists and astro physicists are working together in a massive conspiracy to make us believe they know the temperature of the sun. Because... That would make so much sense.

Wy would they fake this info and why would they have a global conspiracy to hide it, and why would thousands of scientists be in on it. Way do they do to the ones who refuse....

Yes they can when it comes to nuclear energy and physics.

We also know because the sun is a giant thermonuclear reactor, and we have caused thermonuclear reactions on Earth (thermonuclear explosions, inertially confined fusion etc.) and measured the thermal output per cubic volume. Apply math.

Obviously all scientists and astro physicists are working together in a massive conspiracy to make us believe they know the temperature of the sun. Because... That would make so much sense.

Wy would they fake this info and why would they have a global conspiracy to hide it, and why would thousands of scientists be in on it. Way do they do to the ones who refuse....

No im not trolling im being serious and also what good would it do to know how hot it is and why its so hot? I see no reason for spending so much time and money just to find useless information.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Didn’t Dbrand once complain that Casetify was ripping off their designs a well? seems pretty bad of them to try and get around Valve’s copyright this way with that in mind.
    • Dbrand thought they could get away with this Steam Machine case, Valve disagreed by David Uzondu Image via Dbrand Dbrand has cancelled its highly anticipated Companion Cube enclosure for the Valve Steam Machine, which it teased back in November of last year with a concept render and sign-up page, because it did not ask Valve for permission first before manufacturing the case. According to Dbrand, it took the "backwards approach" of building the product first before asking for permission from the copyright holder. Seven months of work went into the project, requiring over a thousand engineering hours from the design team. Workers developed forty-four sets of injection molding tools, making a unique mold for each sub-component of the crate. When the Companion Cube went live on Monday last week, it, according to Dbrand, quickly became the second-fastest-selling product in the company's fifteen-year history, racking up orders for hundreds of thousands of units. Customers eagerly bought the $129.95 deluxe edition or the bare-bones $99.95 version, which the manufacturer cheekily branded as the "Poverty Cube". It was around this time that the legal eagles at Valve descended on the accessory maker with a formal demand. The developer pointed out that the iconic block design remains protected intellectual property from the game Portal, so unlicensed sales had to stop. Dbrand said that all its pleas to salvage the project with the Valve team, including proposals to run a properly licensed release under official terms "with their blessing", fell on deaf ears, so it had no choice but to obey and remove every trace of the product from the internet. If you bought the enclosure, the company said that banks will process your refund by the end of this week, but if it still hasn't arrived in your account by then, you should not hesitate to contact support. The Steam Machine itself is a high-performance console that Valve designed directly to bring PC gaming into the living room. It was announced on 12th November 2025 (the same day Dbrand announced the Cube) and runs on the Linux-based SteamOS, the same OS that powers the Steam Deck. As for the price, due to the shortage of memory and storage chips, the hardware cost landed much higher than people were expecting, starting at $1,049 for the 512 model (without a controller) or $1,128 with the new gamepad. The premium 2 TB model pushes those prices even higher, selling at $1,349 for the standalone console and hitting $1,428 if you want the bundle.
    • It's listed #399.99 on Amazon, per your link. It's not $299.99.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Apprentice
      jahara21 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      534
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      264
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      97
    5. 5
      macoman
      58
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!