FREE 354 day Bitdefender Internet Security 2013!


Recommended Posts

http://www.av-test.o...res/award/2012/

http://www.av-comparatives.org/images/docs/avc_sum_201212_en.pdf - av-comparitives product of the year 2012

January 2013 | CEO Andreas Clementi, AV-Comparatives

The achievement crowns a year of accolades and awards, including PC Mag's Editor's Choice, distinctions from reviewers such as CNET, Laptop Magazine, PC PRO, WebUser, PC Achat and Micro Actuel.

is-2013.png

Great moments are best when shared ?and friends should always be there

Spread the cheer to your friends with three Bitdefender Internet Security 2013 licenses. Let?s all celebrate together!

DOWNLOAD (2.3mb): http://www.mirrorcreator.com/files/11KJONV4/bitdefender_isecurity.exe_links

or:

http://www.softpedia.com/progDownload/BitDefender-Internet-Security-Download-42399.html (choose mirror 1)

LICENCE KEYS: bd2012-s.gifQ5YW7GP or 3NVQXKI

The license keys must be activated within 30 days.

This works btw, here is my screenshot:

16bh6yh.png

I don't know when this offer ends but i suspect it is about to go viral so be QUICK!

Bitdefender finishes 1st-3rd in nearly all antivirus tests on av-comparatives.org and av-test.org along with kaspersky, those are the 2 best despite many of you championing nod32.

  • Like 1

Oh my. I recently installed Bitdefender Antivirus Plus 2013 on my brother's laptop with a license key that expires in 677 days. I wonder if he can use this instead for 365 days and use the anti-virus software for the remaining 312 days.

Oh my. I recently installed Bitdefender Antivirus Plus 2013 on my brother's laptop with a license key that expires in 677 days. I wonder if he can use this instead for 365 days and use the anti-virus software for the remaining 312 days.

lol, i'm afraid not, when i went to install internet security it asked me whether i wanted to use the 677 day serial or use a new serial. Internet security gives you a nice firewall though: http://www.bitdefender.co.uk/solutions/antivirus-comparison.html

Anyone know how this compares to MSE?

It DESTROYS it :p Any paid antivirus destroys MSE, look at the reviews i linked in the 1st post.

It doesn't. Don't fall into all the hype that a paid AV is better then MSE. It simply isn't true. MSE FTW!

I still use MSE but the product has still fallen behind. Only reason I've remained uninfected is due to the paid version of Maleware-Bytes which actively runs in conjunction with MSE.

It doesn't. Don't fall into all the hype that a paid AV is better then MSE. It simply isn't true. MSE FTW!

You clearly didn't read the 2 antivirus test website reviews otherwise you would see that MSE scores very poorly.

Bitdefender: http://www.av-test.org/no_cache/en/tests/test-reports/?tx_avtestreports_pi1%5Breport_no%5D=124551

vs

MSE: http://www.av-test.org/no_cache/en/tests/test-reports/?tx_avtestreports_pi1%5Breport_no%5D=124558

I still use MSE but the product has still fallen behind. Only reason I've remained uninfected is due to the paid version of Maleware-Bytes which actively runs in conjunction with MSE.

I don't run anything else and my system is clean. MSE just works. I ran BitDefender. Eset and Kaspersky before and something has always found it's way through. ClamWin AV is much better, or used to be, then Eset and other paid AVs also. If MSE wasn't around, I would be using ClamWin.

You clearly didn't read the 2 antivirus test website reviews otherwise you would see that MSE scores very poorly.

I don't care what those reviews say. I use what works and MSE does the job.

It doesn't. Don't fall into all the hype that a paid AV is better then MSE. It simply isn't true. MSE FTW!

You're dreaming. MSE isn't as bad as some. And just because a product is paid, doesn't mean it's better. But MSE is not all that great. Sorry to tell you that. I've seen MANY infections that others have caught.

I hope you can ignore false positives because you couldn't in their free product. :(

not sure, unfortunately you can't with avira internet security which is what i used until today. I could choose ignore but minutes later it would detect a keygen as a virus again, it was a pain, other than that i liked avira.

Yeah, I just excluded various folders with MSE but was shocked when I couldn't ignore things that were caught but were false positives with Bitdefender Free. But, I have heard good reviews so I'm excited to try this out.

fixed the link now, posted the internet security installer, the keys i posted are correct for the internet security installer.

MODERATORS, please can you delete the posts that say "delete me" and the ones talking about incorrect serials and links as i've fixed the links in the 1st post now, thanks.

Done. (Y)

You're dreaming. MSE isn't as bad as some. And just because a product is paid, doesn't mean it's better. But MSE is not all that great. Sorry to tell you that. I've seen MANY infections that others have caught.

I agree that just because a product is paid for doesn't mean it's better. But since I have been running MSE and now Defender under Win8, I have only had 1 infection and that was ehen MSE was in beta stage.

When added key to my account, saw clearly that it was identified as : Bitdefender Internet Security 2013

Subscription

365 days left

When I added the key it shows that I have 354 days left on the webpage. But it doesn't show in the actual program.

When added key to my account, saw clearly that it was identified as : Bitdefender Internet Security 2013

Subscription

365 days left

OP has posted the correct link for the correct installer now so yea the keys will work...

I still use MSE but the product has still fallen behind. Only reason I've remained uninfected is due to the paid version of Maleware-Bytes which actively runs in conjunction with MSE.

You shouldn't run two AVs, but I agree. I still suggest MSE as an "At least use this" kind of thing, but it's definitely not as good as it was a year or two ago. Back then it had detection rates with the best of them, now it's definitely towards the mid to bottom of the pack.

You shouldn't run two AVs, but I agree. I still suggest MSE as an "At least use this" kind of thing, but it's definitely not as good as it was a year or two ago. Back then it had detection rates with the best of them, now it's definitely towards the mid to bottom of the pack.

I know, and I typically don't otherwise. They just seem to work great in conjunction with each other though without any pre-configuration for this to work.

I may just dump both for BitDefender though, but we'll see I guess. It's gonna be hard to get away from MBAM since it's done such an incredible job over the years.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • With the current hardware prices Microsoft should lift the restriction. Then if you have the correct TPM then allow you to use X feature, if you don't have the correct TPM then don't but still actually let you run windows. 11. With a disclaimer during install that X features would be unavailable.
    • It's good for recycling of course. But commence inflation of a second hand RAM bubble and price gouging on DDR 4 inventory in 3... 2... 1...
    • Bypassed Windows 11 shows surprising stability on ancient, completely unsupported hardware by Sayan Sen When Windows 11 was first released, one of the most complained-about issues with the new desktop Microsoft OS was its higher system requirements, which pushed many relatively modern and powerful processors and devices onto the officially unsupported list. Thankfully, they have not been updated again for the base OS, though systems require four times the memory and storage if they want to run AI-powered apps and features. As such, Windows 11 technically runs on 4GB of memory, and there is no imposed restriction on the generation of memory it supports. Speaking of memory, prices are extremely high nowadays for hardware, especially DDR5 and DDR4 kits due to the current silicon shortage, and there are also reports of it affecting DDR2 as well, and it might only be a matter of time before even DDR1 gets affected. Before that could happen, an enthusiast took an ancient DDR1-based system and decided to try out Windows 11 on it to see how well the modern OS would fare on such hardware. The system runs an outdated graphics card interface standard based on AGP, or Advanced Graphics Port, called AGP 3.0 or AGP8x. AGP was essentially succeeded by the modern PCI Express (PCIe) bus standard. The user behind the experiment is retro hardware enthusiast Omores, who built the system around an ASRock ConRoe865PE motherboard based on Intel's i865PE chipset from way back in 2003, around the time when AGP was still in fashion. What made this board special back in the day was its unusual support for newer Core 2 Duo and even Core 2 Quad processors while still retaining older DDR1 memory support and an AGP8X graphics slot, making it an ideal bridge or link between two vastly different generations. Powering the machine was Intel's Core 2 Quad Q6600 alongside 3GB of DDR1 RAM and an ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP graphics card, one of the final and most capable GPUs released for the aging AGP interface. While installing Windows 11 itself was relatively easy by bypassing Microsoft's hardware checks, getting the graphics card fully functional proved to be some challenge. Microsoft had quietly dropped native AGP support after the earliest releases of Windows 10, meaning newer versions of Windows no longer include the necessary Graphics Address Remapping Table (GART) drivers required for proper AGP acceleration. Without them, AGP graphics cards typically boot up, though with limited functionality, and can often throw a Code 43 error in Device Manager. To work around the limitation, Omores extracted Intel's legacy AGP440 SYS driver from an early Windows 10 release and paired it with a modified INF file so Windows 11 would correctly recognize the chipset. Following this and combined with AMD's final 64-bit Catalyst AGP drivers from 2012, the Radeon HD 4650 was able to operate with full AGP 8X acceleration intact. The result was said to be surprisingly usable for hardware that is over two decades old. Hardware-accelerated H.264 video playback worked correctly and benefited apps like Firefox, while legacy applications and games ran without major graphical issues. The system also successfully completed the 3DMark 2001 benchmark, although performance naturally lagged behind what the same hardware achieves under Windows 7, which is significantly lighter than Windows 11. There was, however, one unavoidable limitation as Microsoft's Windows 11 version 24H2 introduces a mandatory SSE4.2 CPU instruction requirement that cannot be bypassed through installer modifications or registry tweaks. Since no AGP-era processor supports SSE4.2, Windows 11 version 23H2 effectively becomes the final release capable of running on such systems. Regardless, it is still a very cool feat and quite fascinating to see just how stable Windows 11 turned out to be on such unfamiliar hardware. Source: Omores (Patreon) via O_MORES (Reddit)
    • That will only really help other players that are also responsible for creating the problem.
    • Well, it's good to know that they have found a workaround to a problem that they helped create, I guess...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      539
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!